术中结肠镜检查和同步评分系统对确定左侧结肠切除术吻合完整性的有效性:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY BMC Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1186/s12893-025-02836-6
Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Byung-Soo Park, Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Mi Sook Yun
{"title":"术中结肠镜检查和同步评分系统对确定左侧结肠切除术吻合完整性的有效性:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Byung-Soo Park, Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Mi Sook Yun","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-02836-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the utilization of intraoperative colonoscopy (IOC) for determining the integrity of the anastomosis and to establish an IOC scoring system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2021 to June 2024, we analyzed the clinical data of 160 patients registered in a database who underwent laparoscopic left-sided colectomy at Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital. IOC was performed on all patients, and Mucosal color (MC), stapled line bleeding (BL), proximal redundancy (PR), and bowel preparation (BP) were evaluated and scored as variables. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) and Cohen's kappa was applied to assess the reproducibility of the evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 160 patients, 10 (6.25%) experienced AL. All the IOC variables had kappa values of 0.8 or higher, indicating good agreement. The logistic regression analysis revealed significant differences in the MC 2 (P = 0.017, OR 12.86), PR 2 (P = 0.001, OR 27.64), BP 2 (p = 0.016, OR 10.50) PR 2 score (P = 0.016, OR 10.50) and the sum of the scores (p = 0.001, OR 3.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IOC can be performed as a reference procedure to assess the integrity of the anastomosis during left-sided colorectal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948651/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usefulness of intraoperative colonoscopy and synchronous scoring system for determining the integrity of the anastomosis in left-sided colectomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Byung-Soo Park, Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Mi Sook Yun\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12893-025-02836-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the utilization of intraoperative colonoscopy (IOC) for determining the integrity of the anastomosis and to establish an IOC scoring system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2021 to June 2024, we analyzed the clinical data of 160 patients registered in a database who underwent laparoscopic left-sided colectomy at Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital. IOC was performed on all patients, and Mucosal color (MC), stapled line bleeding (BL), proximal redundancy (PR), and bowel preparation (BP) were evaluated and scored as variables. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) and Cohen's kappa was applied to assess the reproducibility of the evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 160 patients, 10 (6.25%) experienced AL. All the IOC variables had kappa values of 0.8 or higher, indicating good agreement. The logistic regression analysis revealed significant differences in the MC 2 (P = 0.017, OR 12.86), PR 2 (P = 0.001, OR 27.64), BP 2 (p = 0.016, OR 10.50) PR 2 score (P = 0.016, OR 10.50) and the sum of the scores (p = 0.001, OR 3.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IOC can be performed as a reference procedure to assess the integrity of the anastomosis during left-sided colorectal surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948651/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02836-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02836-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估术中结肠镜检查(IOC)在确定吻合完整性方面的应用,并建立IOC评分系统。方法:回顾性队列研究于2021年1月至2024年6月进行,我们分析了数据库中登记的160例在釜山国立大学梁山医院行腹腔镜左侧结肠切除术的患者的临床资料。对所有患者进行IOC,并将粘膜颜色(MC)、钉线出血(BL)、近端冗余(PR)和肠准备(BP)作为变量进行评估和评分。采用Logistic回归分析评价吻合口漏(AL)的危险因素,采用Cohen’s kappa评价评价的可重复性。结果:160例患者中,10例(6.25%)发生AL,所有IOC变量kappa值均在0.8及以上,一致性良好。logistic回归分析显示mc2 (P = 0.017, OR 12.86)、PR 2 (P = 0.001, OR 27.64)、BP 2 (P = 0.016, OR 10.50)、PR 2评分(P = 0.016, OR 10.50)和总分(P = 0.001, OR 3.51)差异均有统计学意义。结论:IOC可作为评价左侧结直肠手术吻合完整性的参考方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Usefulness of intraoperative colonoscopy and synchronous scoring system for determining the integrity of the anastomosis in left-sided colectomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the utilization of intraoperative colonoscopy (IOC) for determining the integrity of the anastomosis and to establish an IOC scoring system.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2021 to June 2024, we analyzed the clinical data of 160 patients registered in a database who underwent laparoscopic left-sided colectomy at Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital. IOC was performed on all patients, and Mucosal color (MC), stapled line bleeding (BL), proximal redundancy (PR), and bowel preparation (BP) were evaluated and scored as variables. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) and Cohen's kappa was applied to assess the reproducibility of the evaluation.

Results: Of 160 patients, 10 (6.25%) experienced AL. All the IOC variables had kappa values of 0.8 or higher, indicating good agreement. The logistic regression analysis revealed significant differences in the MC 2 (P = 0.017, OR 12.86), PR 2 (P = 0.001, OR 27.64), BP 2 (p = 0.016, OR 10.50) PR 2 score (P = 0.016, OR 10.50) and the sum of the scores (p = 0.001, OR 3.51).

Conclusion: IOC can be performed as a reference procedure to assess the integrity of the anastomosis during left-sided colorectal surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
期刊最新文献
Prognostic nutritional index and long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting. Preoperative sleep disturbance and postoperative delirium in elderly joint replacement patients: a prospective cohort study. Laparoscopic endostapler partial cecal resection in complicated appendicitis with appendiceal base involvement: a single-center retrospective study. Efficacy observation of wound care ointment (suile) on incision healing after mixed hemorrhoid surgery. Analysis of prognostic factors for R1/R2 resection in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1