在不同的超宽视场成像系统中量化视网膜大小和形状畸变。

IF 2.7 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMJ Open Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001965
Binwei Huang, Chaoxin Zheng, Siyani Chen, Xulong Liao, Haoyu Chen
{"title":"在不同的超宽视场成像系统中量化视网膜大小和形状畸变。","authors":"Binwei Huang, Chaoxin Zheng, Siyani Chen, Xulong Liao, Haoyu Chen","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantitatively investigate the retinal size and shape distortion in different ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging systems.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>We imaged the posterior segments of model eyes using Daytona, Mirante, CLARUS 500, VG2001, BMizar and TRC-NW8. We measured the scale bars of each grid and the compactness of each ring to quantify the size and shape distortion. The relationship between the relative size with eccentricity and axial length was analysed. The size and shape distortion were compared among different UWF systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The size is positively associated with eccentricity (β=0.202-0.482; p<0.001) and negatively associated with axial length (β=-0.787 to -0.890; p<0.001) in all UWF systems. There is a significant difference in slopes across devices. The size distortion of Mirante is lower than the other UWF systems (p=0.0083-0.0472) except for TRC-NW8. Multivariate linear regression analysis found the adjusted R<sup>2</sup>=0.809-0.948, which was improved to more than 0.960 with a quadratic polynomial equation. Only Daytona showed shape distortion, and the compactness of Daytona is smaller than the others (p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quantitative measurements identified different relationships between size distortion with axial length and eccentricity in different UWF systems, which can serve as a reference for correcting size distortion. Shape distortion only occurs in Daytona.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956332/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying retinal size and shape distortion in different ultra-widefield imaging systems.\",\"authors\":\"Binwei Huang, Chaoxin Zheng, Siyani Chen, Xulong Liao, Haoyu Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantitatively investigate the retinal size and shape distortion in different ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging systems.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>We imaged the posterior segments of model eyes using Daytona, Mirante, CLARUS 500, VG2001, BMizar and TRC-NW8. We measured the scale bars of each grid and the compactness of each ring to quantify the size and shape distortion. The relationship between the relative size with eccentricity and axial length was analysed. The size and shape distortion were compared among different UWF systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The size is positively associated with eccentricity (β=0.202-0.482; p<0.001) and negatively associated with axial length (β=-0.787 to -0.890; p<0.001) in all UWF systems. There is a significant difference in slopes across devices. The size distortion of Mirante is lower than the other UWF systems (p=0.0083-0.0472) except for TRC-NW8. Multivariate linear regression analysis found the adjusted R<sup>2</sup>=0.809-0.948, which was improved to more than 0.960 with a quadratic polynomial equation. Only Daytona showed shape distortion, and the compactness of Daytona is smaller than the others (p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quantitative measurements identified different relationships between size distortion with axial length and eccentricity in different UWF systems, which can serve as a reference for correcting size distortion. Shape distortion only occurs in Daytona.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956332/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001965\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:定量研究不同超宽视场(UWF)成像系统下视网膜的大小和形状畸变。方法与分析:采用Daytona、Mirante、CLARUS 500、VG2001、BMizar、TRC-NW8对模型眼后段进行成像。我们测量了每个网格的比例尺和每个环的紧凑度,以量化大小和形状失真。分析了偏心距相对尺寸与轴向长度之间的关系。比较了不同UWF系统的尺寸和形状畸变。结果:大小与偏心率呈正相关(β=0.202 ~ 0.482;P2 =0.809-0.948,用二次多项式方程改进为0.960以上。结论:通过定量测量,确定了不同UWF系统中尺寸畸变与轴向长度和偏心率之间的关系,可为纠正尺寸畸变提供参考。形状扭曲只发生在代托纳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantifying retinal size and shape distortion in different ultra-widefield imaging systems.

Objective: To quantitatively investigate the retinal size and shape distortion in different ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging systems.

Methods and analysis: We imaged the posterior segments of model eyes using Daytona, Mirante, CLARUS 500, VG2001, BMizar and TRC-NW8. We measured the scale bars of each grid and the compactness of each ring to quantify the size and shape distortion. The relationship between the relative size with eccentricity and axial length was analysed. The size and shape distortion were compared among different UWF systems.

Results: The size is positively associated with eccentricity (β=0.202-0.482; p<0.001) and negatively associated with axial length (β=-0.787 to -0.890; p<0.001) in all UWF systems. There is a significant difference in slopes across devices. The size distortion of Mirante is lower than the other UWF systems (p=0.0083-0.0472) except for TRC-NW8. Multivariate linear regression analysis found the adjusted R2=0.809-0.948, which was improved to more than 0.960 with a quadratic polynomial equation. Only Daytona showed shape distortion, and the compactness of Daytona is smaller than the others (p<0.0001).

Conclusion: Quantitative measurements identified different relationships between size distortion with axial length and eccentricity in different UWF systems, which can serve as a reference for correcting size distortion. Shape distortion only occurs in Daytona.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
A systematic review of neuroprotective therapies for visual acuity preservation in retinitis pigmentosa. Alternative posology for brolucizumab: a 6-week loading regimen is as effective as a 4-week regimen for the treatment of nAMD. Relevance of autoantibodies to carbonic anhydrase 6 (CA6), parotid secretory protein (PSP) and salivary gland protein 1 (SP1) to dry eye disease (DED). Validation of 3nethra specto, a wearable digital subjective refractor versus conventional subjective refraction for refractive error measurement in young adults: a comparative study. Retinal vasculature-derived proteins serve as potential systemic biomarkers for diabetic retinopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1