社会规范强度与规范变化

IF 6.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Current Opinion in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-22 DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102040
Aron Szekely , Luca Tummolini , Eva Vriens , Giulia Andrighetto
{"title":"社会规范强度与规范变化","authors":"Aron Szekely ,&nbsp;Luca Tummolini ,&nbsp;Eva Vriens ,&nbsp;Giulia Andrighetto","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social norms vary both in terms of their content (e.g. don't talk to strangers, help the needy) and their strength. While most research focuses on the former, increasing evidence points to the relevance of the latter for norm change. Despite this potential, existing knowledge about norm strength is siloed into “macro” and “micro” perspectives, with the former studying aggregations of norms and the latter focusing on particular, individual, social rules. We argue that both approaches provide valuable insights into social norm strength. Using this reorientation, we integrate existing research strands and discuss foundational questions about the causes of social norm strength and its consequences for norm change, highlighting limitations and potential future directions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 102040"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social norm strength and norm change\",\"authors\":\"Aron Szekely ,&nbsp;Luca Tummolini ,&nbsp;Eva Vriens ,&nbsp;Giulia Andrighetto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Social norms vary both in terms of their content (e.g. don't talk to strangers, help the needy) and their strength. While most research focuses on the former, increasing evidence points to the relevance of the latter for norm change. Despite this potential, existing knowledge about norm strength is siloed into “macro” and “micro” perspectives, with the former studying aggregations of norms and the latter focusing on particular, individual, social rules. We argue that both approaches provide valuable insights into social norm strength. Using this reorientation, we integrate existing research strands and discuss foundational questions about the causes of social norm strength and its consequences for norm change, highlighting limitations and potential future directions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"64 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102040\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25000533\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25000533","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会规范在内容(例如,不与陌生人交谈,帮助有需要的人)和力度方面各不相同。虽然大多数研究都集中在前者,但越来越多的证据表明后者与规范变化有关。尽管存在这种潜力,但现有的关于规范强度的知识被分为“宏观”和“微观”两种观点,前者研究规范的集合,后者关注特定的、个人的、社会的规则。我们认为,这两种方法都为社会规范强度提供了有价值的见解。利用这种重新定位,我们整合了现有的研究线索,并讨论了有关社会规范强度的原因及其对规范变化的影响的基本问题,强调了局限性和潜在的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social norm strength and norm change
Social norms vary both in terms of their content (e.g. don't talk to strangers, help the needy) and their strength. While most research focuses on the former, increasing evidence points to the relevance of the latter for norm change. Despite this potential, existing knowledge about norm strength is siloed into “macro” and “micro” perspectives, with the former studying aggregations of norms and the latter focusing on particular, individual, social rules. We argue that both approaches provide valuable insights into social norm strength. Using this reorientation, we integrate existing research strands and discuss foundational questions about the causes of social norm strength and its consequences for norm change, highlighting limitations and potential future directions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychology
Current Opinion in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
293
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows. Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include: * Biological psychology * Clinical psychology * Cognitive psychology * Community psychology * Comparative psychology * Developmental psychology * Educational psychology * Environmental psychology * Evolutionary psychology * Health psychology * Neuropsychology * Personality psychology * Social psychology
期刊最新文献
Collective memory and genetic social psychology: A necessary rediscovery in times of polycrisis Corrigendum to ‘Building a collective memory: The case for collective forgetting’ [Curr Opin Psychol 23 (2018) 88–92] Prejudice against jagged personality profiles: Rethinking bias in psychological research and clinical practice Rebuilding trust in CBT: Intellectual humility and multicultural competencies as responses to political criticism Relational cultural theory: Context in therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1