单侧内镜双门静脉技术治疗退行性椎管狭窄单节段减压的临床和影像学结果:超过5年的随访。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Spine Surgery Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001776
Ju-Eun Kim, Eugene J Park, Daniel K Park
{"title":"单侧内镜双门静脉技术治疗退行性椎管狭窄单节段减压的临床和影像学结果:超过5年的随访。","authors":"Ju-Eun Kim, Eugene J Park, Daniel K Park","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report radiologic and clinical outcomes of single-level unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) decompression over 5 years for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) without instability.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>UBE decompression has recently been introduced as a surgical treatment for LSS without instability. UBE has been shown in studies to have advantages in the prevention of infection and early rehabilitation. However, there is no long-term follow-up study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred twenty-seven patients who underwent UBE decompression for single-level LSS with at least 5 years of follow-up were analyzed. Clinical outcomes including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual analog system (VAS), modified MacNab criteria, time to ambulation, operative time, and length of hospital stay were investigated. The radiologic outcome was assessed by dynamic plain radiographs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ODI improved from 63.2±10.7 before surgery to 18.8±9.2 after 5 years of follow-up ( P <0.001). Leg VAS decreased from 7.3±0.7 before surgery to 1.75±0.5 at the last follow-up ( P <0.001). Per modified Macnab criteria, only 9.4% (12/127) showed poor clinical results. There were no infections, but there were 4 cases (3%) of dura tear and 1 case (0.07%) of transient palsy. Intervertebral angle showed significant change from preoperative to final follow-up, 6.3 ±3.2-5.2 ±3.5 degrees. ( P =0.012). The intervertebral distance also showed a significant difference from 10.5±2.3 mm before surgery to 9.1±2.2 mm after surgery. ( P =0.005). No significant changes in dynamic stability occurred. Among 127 patients, revision surgery was performed in 9 cases (7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UBE decompression of LSS without instability demonstrated good clinical outcomes over 5 years and did not show significant segmental instability after surgery. Although revision surgery was performed after UBE decompression, there were no severe complications, and revision rates were similar to other techniques. UBE is considered to be an alternative technique to microscopic and traditional decompression in LSS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"E499-E506"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Single-level Decompression by Unilateral Endoscopic Biportal Technique in Degenerative Spinal Stenosis: Over 5-year Follow-up.\",\"authors\":\"Ju-Eun Kim, Eugene J Park, Daniel K Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report radiologic and clinical outcomes of single-level unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) decompression over 5 years for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) without instability.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>UBE decompression has recently been introduced as a surgical treatment for LSS without instability. UBE has been shown in studies to have advantages in the prevention of infection and early rehabilitation. However, there is no long-term follow-up study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred twenty-seven patients who underwent UBE decompression for single-level LSS with at least 5 years of follow-up were analyzed. Clinical outcomes including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual analog system (VAS), modified MacNab criteria, time to ambulation, operative time, and length of hospital stay were investigated. The radiologic outcome was assessed by dynamic plain radiographs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ODI improved from 63.2±10.7 before surgery to 18.8±9.2 after 5 years of follow-up ( P <0.001). Leg VAS decreased from 7.3±0.7 before surgery to 1.75±0.5 at the last follow-up ( P <0.001). Per modified Macnab criteria, only 9.4% (12/127) showed poor clinical results. There were no infections, but there were 4 cases (3%) of dura tear and 1 case (0.07%) of transient palsy. Intervertebral angle showed significant change from preoperative to final follow-up, 6.3 ±3.2-5.2 ±3.5 degrees. ( P =0.012). The intervertebral distance also showed a significant difference from 10.5±2.3 mm before surgery to 9.1±2.2 mm after surgery. ( P =0.005). No significant changes in dynamic stability occurred. Among 127 patients, revision surgery was performed in 9 cases (7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UBE decompression of LSS without instability demonstrated good clinical outcomes over 5 years and did not show significant segmental instability after surgery. Although revision surgery was performed after UBE decompression, there were no severe complications, and revision rates were similar to other techniques. UBE is considered to be an alternative technique to microscopic and traditional decompression in LSS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"E499-E506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001776\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001776","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:回顾性。目的:报告5年来单水平单侧双门静脉内镜(UBE)减压治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)无不稳定性的放射学和临床结果。背景资料总结:UBE减压术最近被引入作为LSS无不稳定性的手术治疗。研究表明,UBE在预防感染和早期康复方面具有优势。然而,尚无长期随访研究。方法:对127例行UBE减压治疗单节段LSS患者进行5年以上随访分析。临床结果包括Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、视觉模拟系统(VAS)、改良MacNab标准、行走时间、手术时间和住院时间。放射学结果通过动态x线平片评估。结果:ODI由术前的63.2±10.7改善至随访5年后的18.8±9.2。结论:UBE减压无失稳LSS 5年临床效果良好,术后无明显节段失稳。虽然在UBE减压后进行了翻修手术,但没有严重的并发症,翻修率与其他技术相似。UBE被认为是LSS显微减压和传统减压的替代技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Single-level Decompression by Unilateral Endoscopic Biportal Technique in Degenerative Spinal Stenosis: Over 5-year Follow-up.

Study design: Retrospective.

Objective: To report radiologic and clinical outcomes of single-level unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) decompression over 5 years for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) without instability.

Summary of background data: UBE decompression has recently been introduced as a surgical treatment for LSS without instability. UBE has been shown in studies to have advantages in the prevention of infection and early rehabilitation. However, there is no long-term follow-up study.

Methods: One hundred twenty-seven patients who underwent UBE decompression for single-level LSS with at least 5 years of follow-up were analyzed. Clinical outcomes including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual analog system (VAS), modified MacNab criteria, time to ambulation, operative time, and length of hospital stay were investigated. The radiologic outcome was assessed by dynamic plain radiographs.

Results: ODI improved from 63.2±10.7 before surgery to 18.8±9.2 after 5 years of follow-up ( P <0.001). Leg VAS decreased from 7.3±0.7 before surgery to 1.75±0.5 at the last follow-up ( P <0.001). Per modified Macnab criteria, only 9.4% (12/127) showed poor clinical results. There were no infections, but there were 4 cases (3%) of dura tear and 1 case (0.07%) of transient palsy. Intervertebral angle showed significant change from preoperative to final follow-up, 6.3 ±3.2-5.2 ±3.5 degrees. ( P =0.012). The intervertebral distance also showed a significant difference from 10.5±2.3 mm before surgery to 9.1±2.2 mm after surgery. ( P =0.005). No significant changes in dynamic stability occurred. Among 127 patients, revision surgery was performed in 9 cases (7%).

Conclusions: UBE decompression of LSS without instability demonstrated good clinical outcomes over 5 years and did not show significant segmental instability after surgery. Although revision surgery was performed after UBE decompression, there were no severe complications, and revision rates were similar to other techniques. UBE is considered to be an alternative technique to microscopic and traditional decompression in LSS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Demographic and Microorganism Differences Between De Novo and Postoperative Infections. Twelve-Month Comparative Efficacy of Lumbar Fusion and Radiofrequency Ablation in the Management of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Cohort Study. A Surgical Technique Guide for C1-2 Fixation By the Cervical Spine Research Society. Implant Migration After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review. Postoperative Footdrop Following Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Associated Complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1