{"title":"更正“饮食失调的感觉加工:自我报告清单的系统回顾和荟萃分析”。","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/eat.24424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cobbaert, L., P. Hay, P. B. Mitchell, S. J. Roza, and I. Perkes. 2024. “Sensory Processing Across Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Self-Report Inventories.” <i>International Journal of Eating Disorders</i> 57, no. 7: 1465–1488. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24184.</p><p>In Table 2 (pp. 1474–1475), the multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA) is included in two columns, AN (anorexia nervosa) and HC (healthy control). The MAIA data columns related to Martini et al.'s (2021) paper (https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2863) have been switched, so that the data related to AN (means, standard deviations) were reported as HC data, and the HC data as AN data. However, our interpretation remains valid.</p><p>The correct values are as follows:</p><p>It should also be noted that Martini et al.'s (2021) paper reverses MAIA scores, such that a higher score indicates lower interoceptive awareness, which is the opposite of the typical MAIA scoring protocol.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"58 7","pages":"1399-1405"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eat.24424","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction to “Sensory Processing Across Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Self-Report Inventories”\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eat.24424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Cobbaert, L., P. Hay, P. B. Mitchell, S. J. Roza, and I. Perkes. 2024. “Sensory Processing Across Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Self-Report Inventories.” <i>International Journal of Eating Disorders</i> 57, no. 7: 1465–1488. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24184.</p><p>In Table 2 (pp. 1474–1475), the multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA) is included in two columns, AN (anorexia nervosa) and HC (healthy control). The MAIA data columns related to Martini et al.'s (2021) paper (https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2863) have been switched, so that the data related to AN (means, standard deviations) were reported as HC data, and the HC data as AN data. However, our interpretation remains valid.</p><p>The correct values are as follows:</p><p>It should also be noted that Martini et al.'s (2021) paper reverses MAIA scores, such that a higher score indicates lower interoceptive awareness, which is the opposite of the typical MAIA scoring protocol.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\"58 7\",\"pages\":\"1399-1405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eat.24424\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eat.24424\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eat.24424","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
柯柏特,L., P.海,P. B.米切尔,S. J.罗扎和I.珀克斯。2024。饮食失调的感觉加工:自我报告清单的系统回顾和荟萃分析。《国际饮食失调杂志》57,第2期。7: 1465 - 1488。https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24184.In表2(第1474-1475页),内感受意识的多维评估(MAIA)包括在两列中,AN(神经性厌食症)和HC(健康对照)。将Martini et al.(2021)论文(https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2863)相关的MAIA数据列进行了切换,将AN(均值、标准差)相关的数据报告为HC数据,HC数据报告为AN数据。然而,我们的解释仍然有效。需要注意的是,Martini et al.(2021)的论文颠倒了MAIA分数,分数越高表明内感受意识越低,这与典型的MAIA评分方案相反。我们为这个错误道歉。
Correction to “Sensory Processing Across Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Self-Report Inventories”
Cobbaert, L., P. Hay, P. B. Mitchell, S. J. Roza, and I. Perkes. 2024. “Sensory Processing Across Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Self-Report Inventories.” International Journal of Eating Disorders 57, no. 7: 1465–1488. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24184.
In Table 2 (pp. 1474–1475), the multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA) is included in two columns, AN (anorexia nervosa) and HC (healthy control). The MAIA data columns related to Martini et al.'s (2021) paper (https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2863) have been switched, so that the data related to AN (means, standard deviations) were reported as HC data, and the HC data as AN data. However, our interpretation remains valid.
The correct values are as follows:
It should also be noted that Martini et al.'s (2021) paper reverses MAIA scores, such that a higher score indicates lower interoceptive awareness, which is the opposite of the typical MAIA scoring protocol.
期刊介绍:
Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.