CHARGE综合征患者和同胞对照的肠道微生物组初步研究。

IF 1.7 4区 生物学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A Pub Date : 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1002/ajmg.a.64053
Emily R. Chedrawe, Jessica Connors, Angela Arra, Katherine Dunn, Kim Blake, Johan van Limbergen
{"title":"CHARGE综合征患者和同胞对照的肠道微生物组初步研究。","authors":"Emily R. Chedrawe,&nbsp;Jessica Connors,&nbsp;Angela Arra,&nbsp;Katherine Dunn,&nbsp;Kim Blake,&nbsp;Johan van Limbergen","doi":"10.1002/ajmg.a.64053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Difficulties with feeding and digestion are common in individuals with CHARGE syndrome. Animal models with <i>CHD7</i> gene variants demonstrate abnormal gut innovation and dysmotility. Our pilot study evaluated whether individuals with CHARGE syndrome have differences in their gut microbiome compared to unaffected siblings. Participants between the ages of 2–18 were recruited from Atlantic Canada with a confirmed genetic diagnosis of CHARGE syndrome. Gut Microbiome DNA analysis was performed on stool samples using 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequences. The PASSFP and PEDSQL served as GI symptom questionnaires. Eleven participants completed this study with one twin pair (CHARGE syndrome = 7, sibling controls = 4). The mean percent abundance for the four most common phyla in individuals with CHARGE versus Controls showed a trend towards increased Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and a decrease in Firmicutes and Actinobacteria but was not significant. Microbiome comparisons based on abnormal (&lt; 77) and normal (<span></span><math>\n \n <semantics>\n \n <mrow>\n \n <mo>≥</mo>\n </mrow>\n </semantics>\n </math> 77) GI scores, found significantly elevated Bacteroidetes (<i>p</i> = 0.042, 59.5% ± 15.1% vs. 33.1% ± 14.6%) and decreased Firmicutes (<i>p</i> = 0.042, 37.5% ± 15.9% vs. 62.4% ± 14.0%) with abnormal scores. Alpha diversity did not differ with either disease or GI symptom scores. Our data showed that, although there was a trend in changes in the gut microbiome in individuals with CHARGE compared to unaffected siblings, this change appears to be related to the severity of GI symptoms and not necessarily CHARGE itself, as differences were more pronounced in individuals with more difficulties with feeding and GI symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":7507,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A","volume":"197 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajmg.a.64053","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gut Microbiome Pilot Study of Patients With CHARGE Syndrome and Sibling Controls\",\"authors\":\"Emily R. Chedrawe,&nbsp;Jessica Connors,&nbsp;Angela Arra,&nbsp;Katherine Dunn,&nbsp;Kim Blake,&nbsp;Johan van Limbergen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajmg.a.64053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Difficulties with feeding and digestion are common in individuals with CHARGE syndrome. Animal models with <i>CHD7</i> gene variants demonstrate abnormal gut innovation and dysmotility. Our pilot study evaluated whether individuals with CHARGE syndrome have differences in their gut microbiome compared to unaffected siblings. Participants between the ages of 2–18 were recruited from Atlantic Canada with a confirmed genetic diagnosis of CHARGE syndrome. Gut Microbiome DNA analysis was performed on stool samples using 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequences. The PASSFP and PEDSQL served as GI symptom questionnaires. Eleven participants completed this study with one twin pair (CHARGE syndrome = 7, sibling controls = 4). The mean percent abundance for the four most common phyla in individuals with CHARGE versus Controls showed a trend towards increased Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and a decrease in Firmicutes and Actinobacteria but was not significant. Microbiome comparisons based on abnormal (&lt; 77) and normal (<span></span><math>\\n \\n <semantics>\\n \\n <mrow>\\n \\n <mo>≥</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n </semantics>\\n </math> 77) GI scores, found significantly elevated Bacteroidetes (<i>p</i> = 0.042, 59.5% ± 15.1% vs. 33.1% ± 14.6%) and decreased Firmicutes (<i>p</i> = 0.042, 37.5% ± 15.9% vs. 62.4% ± 14.0%) with abnormal scores. Alpha diversity did not differ with either disease or GI symptom scores. Our data showed that, although there was a trend in changes in the gut microbiome in individuals with CHARGE compared to unaffected siblings, this change appears to be related to the severity of GI symptoms and not necessarily CHARGE itself, as differences were more pronounced in individuals with more difficulties with feeding and GI symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A\",\"volume\":\"197 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajmg.a.64053\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajmg.a.64053\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajmg.a.64053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

进食和消化困难在CHARGE综合征患者中很常见。携带CHD7基因变异的动物模型显示出异常的肠道创新和运动障碍。我们的初步研究评估了与未受影响的兄弟姐妹相比,CHARGE综合征患者的肠道微生物群是否存在差异。参与者年龄在2-18岁之间,来自加拿大大西洋地区,确诊为CHARGE综合征的遗传诊断。采用16S核糖体RNA (rRNA)基因序列对粪便样本进行肠道微生物组DNA分析。PASSFP和PEDSQL作为GI症状问卷。11名参与者完成了这项研究,其中一对双胞胎(CHARGE综合征= 7,兄弟姐妹对照组= 4)。与对照组相比,CHARGE组四种最常见门的平均丰度呈拟杆菌门、变形杆菌门增加、厚壁菌门和放线菌门减少的趋势,但不显著。基于异常(≥$$ \ge $$ 77) GI评分的微生物组比较,发现Bacteroidetes显著升高(p = 0.042, 59.5)% ± 15.1% vs. 33.1% ± 14.6%) and decreased Firmicutes (p = 0.042, 37.5% ± 15.9% vs. 62.4% ± 14.0%) with abnormal scores. Alpha diversity did not differ with either disease or GI symptom scores. Our data showed that, although there was a trend in changes in the gut microbiome in individuals with CHARGE compared to unaffected siblings, this change appears to be related to the severity of GI symptoms and not necessarily CHARGE itself, as differences were more pronounced in individuals with more difficulties with feeding and GI symptoms.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gut Microbiome Pilot Study of Patients With CHARGE Syndrome and Sibling Controls

Difficulties with feeding and digestion are common in individuals with CHARGE syndrome. Animal models with CHD7 gene variants demonstrate abnormal gut innovation and dysmotility. Our pilot study evaluated whether individuals with CHARGE syndrome have differences in their gut microbiome compared to unaffected siblings. Participants between the ages of 2–18 were recruited from Atlantic Canada with a confirmed genetic diagnosis of CHARGE syndrome. Gut Microbiome DNA analysis was performed on stool samples using 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequences. The PASSFP and PEDSQL served as GI symptom questionnaires. Eleven participants completed this study with one twin pair (CHARGE syndrome = 7, sibling controls = 4). The mean percent abundance for the four most common phyla in individuals with CHARGE versus Controls showed a trend towards increased Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and a decrease in Firmicutes and Actinobacteria but was not significant. Microbiome comparisons based on abnormal (< 77) and normal (  77) GI scores, found significantly elevated Bacteroidetes (p = 0.042, 59.5% ± 15.1% vs. 33.1% ± 14.6%) and decreased Firmicutes (p = 0.042, 37.5% ± 15.9% vs. 62.4% ± 14.0%) with abnormal scores. Alpha diversity did not differ with either disease or GI symptom scores. Our data showed that, although there was a trend in changes in the gut microbiome in individuals with CHARGE compared to unaffected siblings, this change appears to be related to the severity of GI symptoms and not necessarily CHARGE itself, as differences were more pronounced in individuals with more difficulties with feeding and GI symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
432
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medical Genetics - Part A (AJMG) gives you continuous coverage of all biological and medical aspects of genetic disorders and birth defects, as well as in-depth documentation of phenotype analysis within the current context of genotype/phenotype correlations. In addition to Part A , AJMG also publishes two other parts: Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics , covering experimental and clinical investigations of the genetic mechanisms underlying neurologic and psychiatric disorders. Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics , guest-edited collections of thematic reviews of topical interest to the readership of AJMG .
期刊最新文献
The 9th International RASopathies Symposium. A New Patient With SPOUT1-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder Identified by Genomic Data Re-Analysis: Novel Phenotypic Features and Literature Review. A More Precise Description of the AKT2-Related Hypoinsulinemic Hypoglycemia and Overgrowth Syndrome Phenotype, Formerly Described Under the MORFAN Acronym. Expanding the Phenotype of TUFM -Related Combined Oxidative Phosphorylation Deficiency 4. Finding the Genetic Diagnosis for a Mother and Daughter With a Novel Phenotype of Hand and Foot Abnormalities and Severe Pectus Excavatum Previously Reported in Am J Med Genet Part A by Low K et al. (2013).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1