骶神经调节治疗大便失禁的患者经验——一项多中心、纵向队列研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY International Journal of Colorectal Disease Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1007/s00384-025-04870-5
Matthew P Irwin, Yang Yu, Catherine E Turner, Kevin C Ooi, Matthew J Morgan
{"title":"骶神经调节治疗大便失禁的患者经验——一项多中心、纵向队列研究。","authors":"Matthew P Irwin, Yang Yu, Catherine E Turner, Kevin C Ooi, Matthew J Morgan","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-04870-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an established treatment for faecal incontinence. This study analyses patient experience with SNM beyond quality of life and incontinence scores to better understand patient expectations and improve patient selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients receiving SNM for faecal incontinence at three Australian sites from 2013 to 2023 were subject to cohort analysis. St. Mark's Incontinence Score (SMIS) and Rapid Assessment of Faecal Incontinence Score (RAFIS) assessed incontinence and quality of life. Thematic analysis of structured interviews qualitatively assessed patient experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one patients aged 52-86 years (M = 69) experienced SNM and 56 agreed to interview at median 6-year post-procedure. Forty-five (63%) proceeded to permanent SNM and progression was not influenced by age, sex, culture, insurance status or presence of anal sphincter defect. Thirty-nine (87%) retained their neuromodulator with battery life M = 6.5 years, 95% CI [5.2, 7.8]. Permanent SNM improved incontinence (P < 0.01) and quality of life (P < 0.01). Forty-eight (86%) patients desired 30-min education pre- and post-procedure. Thirty-seven (86%) desired follow-ups at 1 month, 12 months and at battery depletion. Twenty (36%) had initial reservations which resolved in all but one patient. Twenty-one (54%) remained dependent on others for neuromodulator customisation and this dependence increased with age (P = 0.02). Fifty (89%) recommend SNM to others, despite 8 (14%) regretting their personal experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SNM continues to improve faecal incontinence and quality of life. Initial reservations usually resolve and most patients recommend it to others. While adequate patient education and follow-up is not onerous to achieve, most patients remain dependent for neuromodulator customisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"40 1","pages":"84"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11965221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient experience with sacral neuromodulation for faecal incontinence - a multi-centre, longitudinal cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew P Irwin, Yang Yu, Catherine E Turner, Kevin C Ooi, Matthew J Morgan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00384-025-04870-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an established treatment for faecal incontinence. This study analyses patient experience with SNM beyond quality of life and incontinence scores to better understand patient expectations and improve patient selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients receiving SNM for faecal incontinence at three Australian sites from 2013 to 2023 were subject to cohort analysis. St. Mark's Incontinence Score (SMIS) and Rapid Assessment of Faecal Incontinence Score (RAFIS) assessed incontinence and quality of life. Thematic analysis of structured interviews qualitatively assessed patient experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one patients aged 52-86 years (M = 69) experienced SNM and 56 agreed to interview at median 6-year post-procedure. Forty-five (63%) proceeded to permanent SNM and progression was not influenced by age, sex, culture, insurance status or presence of anal sphincter defect. Thirty-nine (87%) retained their neuromodulator with battery life M = 6.5 years, 95% CI [5.2, 7.8]. Permanent SNM improved incontinence (P < 0.01) and quality of life (P < 0.01). Forty-eight (86%) patients desired 30-min education pre- and post-procedure. Thirty-seven (86%) desired follow-ups at 1 month, 12 months and at battery depletion. Twenty (36%) had initial reservations which resolved in all but one patient. Twenty-one (54%) remained dependent on others for neuromodulator customisation and this dependence increased with age (P = 0.02). Fifty (89%) recommend SNM to others, despite 8 (14%) regretting their personal experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SNM continues to improve faecal incontinence and quality of life. Initial reservations usually resolve and most patients recommend it to others. While adequate patient education and follow-up is not onerous to achieve, most patients remain dependent for neuromodulator customisation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Colorectal Disease\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11965221/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Colorectal Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-025-04870-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-025-04870-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:骶神经调节(SNM)是一种成熟的治疗大便失禁的方法。本研究分析了SNM患者在生活质量和尿失禁评分之外的经验,以更好地了解患者的期望并改善患者的选择。方法:对2013年至2023年在澳大利亚三个地点接受SNM治疗大便失禁的患者进行队列分析。St. Mark失禁评分(SMIS)和粪便失禁快速评估评分(RAFIS)评估失禁和生活质量。结构化访谈的专题分析定性地评估了患者的体验。结果:51例52-86岁的患者(M = 69)经历了SNM, 56例同意在术后中位6年随访。45例(63%)发展为永久性SNM,其进展不受年龄、性别、文化、保险状况或肛门括约肌缺损的影响。39例(87%)保留了电池寿命M = 6.5年的神经调节剂,95% CI[5.2, 7.8]。结论:SNM持续改善尿失禁和生活质量。最初的保留通常会解决,大多数患者会推荐给其他人。虽然足够的患者教育和随访并不困难,但大多数患者仍然依赖于神经调节剂定制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient experience with sacral neuromodulation for faecal incontinence - a multi-centre, longitudinal cohort study.

Purpose: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an established treatment for faecal incontinence. This study analyses patient experience with SNM beyond quality of life and incontinence scores to better understand patient expectations and improve patient selection.

Methods: Patients receiving SNM for faecal incontinence at three Australian sites from 2013 to 2023 were subject to cohort analysis. St. Mark's Incontinence Score (SMIS) and Rapid Assessment of Faecal Incontinence Score (RAFIS) assessed incontinence and quality of life. Thematic analysis of structured interviews qualitatively assessed patient experience.

Results: Seventy-one patients aged 52-86 years (M = 69) experienced SNM and 56 agreed to interview at median 6-year post-procedure. Forty-five (63%) proceeded to permanent SNM and progression was not influenced by age, sex, culture, insurance status or presence of anal sphincter defect. Thirty-nine (87%) retained their neuromodulator with battery life M = 6.5 years, 95% CI [5.2, 7.8]. Permanent SNM improved incontinence (P < 0.01) and quality of life (P < 0.01). Forty-eight (86%) patients desired 30-min education pre- and post-procedure. Thirty-seven (86%) desired follow-ups at 1 month, 12 months and at battery depletion. Twenty (36%) had initial reservations which resolved in all but one patient. Twenty-one (54%) remained dependent on others for neuromodulator customisation and this dependence increased with age (P = 0.02). Fifty (89%) recommend SNM to others, despite 8 (14%) regretting their personal experience.

Conclusion: SNM continues to improve faecal incontinence and quality of life. Initial reservations usually resolve and most patients recommend it to others. While adequate patient education and follow-up is not onerous to achieve, most patients remain dependent for neuromodulator customisation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
期刊最新文献
The subtype identification of colorectal cancer and construction of the risk model based on cholesterol synthesis-related genes to predict prognosis and guide immunotherapy. Preoperative chemotherapy for colon cancer and short-term outcomes-a nationwide cohort study. Change in faecal incontinence pattern after gastric bypass surgery: related to change in anal sphincter thickness? An interpretable machine learning model based on MRI radiomics and GAME score for predicting early recurrence after thermal ablation in colorectal liver metastases. Machine learning-based integration of tumor deposit molecular signatures improves prognostic stratification in colon adenocarcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1