使用预注册干预研究告知主观幸福感的结构

IF 3.7 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Happiness Studies Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1007/s10902-025-00892-6
Michael A. Busseri
{"title":"使用预注册干预研究告知主观幸福感的结构","authors":"Michael A. Busseri","doi":"10.1007/s10902-025-00892-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present work examined results from preregistered intervention studies to inform the structure of subjective well-being (SWB). In five studies aimed at boosting individuals’ SWB, pre- and post-intervention assessments of life satisfaction (LS), positive affect (PA), and negative affect (NA) were examined as separate components in isolated analyses (Model 1), as a causal system in which PA and NA are inputs to LS (Model 2), and as indicators of a latent SWB factor based on a hierarchical conceptualization (Model 3). In each study, robust associations were found among all three SWB components within and across time (contrary to the separate components model); predictive effects were found among all three SWB components across time, rather than unidirectional effects from PA and NA to LS (contrary to the causal system model). In support of a hierarchical conceptualization, all three components had strong loadings on a latent SWB at pre- and post-intervention; in addition, in four studies the intervention had a significant effect on a latent SWB factor, but no unique (residual) effects on LS, PA, or NA. The present work thus provides valuable new insights based on experimental evidence from preregistered intervention studies in support of a hierarchical structure for SWB.</p>","PeriodicalId":15837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Happiness Studies","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informing the Structure of Subjective Well-Being Using Preregistered Intervention Studies\",\"authors\":\"Michael A. Busseri\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10902-025-00892-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The present work examined results from preregistered intervention studies to inform the structure of subjective well-being (SWB). In five studies aimed at boosting individuals’ SWB, pre- and post-intervention assessments of life satisfaction (LS), positive affect (PA), and negative affect (NA) were examined as separate components in isolated analyses (Model 1), as a causal system in which PA and NA are inputs to LS (Model 2), and as indicators of a latent SWB factor based on a hierarchical conceptualization (Model 3). In each study, robust associations were found among all three SWB components within and across time (contrary to the separate components model); predictive effects were found among all three SWB components across time, rather than unidirectional effects from PA and NA to LS (contrary to the causal system model). In support of a hierarchical conceptualization, all three components had strong loadings on a latent SWB at pre- and post-intervention; in addition, in four studies the intervention had a significant effect on a latent SWB factor, but no unique (residual) effects on LS, PA, or NA. The present work thus provides valuable new insights based on experimental evidence from preregistered intervention studies in support of a hierarchical structure for SWB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Happiness Studies\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Happiness Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-025-00892-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Happiness Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-025-00892-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究检查了预登记干预研究的结果,以了解主观幸福感的结构。在五项旨在提高个体幸福感的研究中,生活满意度(LS)、积极情绪(PA)和消极情绪(NA)的干预前和干预后评估在孤立分析中被视为单独的组成部分(模型1),作为一个因果系统,其中积极情绪和消极情绪是幸福感的输入(模型2),以及作为基于层次概念的潜在幸福感因素的指标(模型3)。在所有三个主观幸福感成分之间发现了在时间内和跨时间的强大关联(与单独成分模型相反);在所有三个主观幸福感成分中发现了跨时间的预测效应,而不是从PA和NA到LS的单向效应(与因果系统模型相反)。为了支持分层概念,在干预前和干预后,所有三个成分对潜在主观幸福感都有很强的负荷;此外,在四项研究中,干预对潜在的SWB因素有显著影响,但对LS、PA或NA没有独特的(残余)影响。因此,本研究基于预先登记的干预研究的实验证据,为支持主观幸福感的分层结构提供了有价值的新见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Informing the Structure of Subjective Well-Being Using Preregistered Intervention Studies

The present work examined results from preregistered intervention studies to inform the structure of subjective well-being (SWB). In five studies aimed at boosting individuals’ SWB, pre- and post-intervention assessments of life satisfaction (LS), positive affect (PA), and negative affect (NA) were examined as separate components in isolated analyses (Model 1), as a causal system in which PA and NA are inputs to LS (Model 2), and as indicators of a latent SWB factor based on a hierarchical conceptualization (Model 3). In each study, robust associations were found among all three SWB components within and across time (contrary to the separate components model); predictive effects were found among all three SWB components across time, rather than unidirectional effects from PA and NA to LS (contrary to the causal system model). In support of a hierarchical conceptualization, all three components had strong loadings on a latent SWB at pre- and post-intervention; in addition, in four studies the intervention had a significant effect on a latent SWB factor, but no unique (residual) effects on LS, PA, or NA. The present work thus provides valuable new insights based on experimental evidence from preregistered intervention studies in support of a hierarchical structure for SWB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: The international peer-reviewed Journal of Happiness Studies is devoted to theoretical and applied advancements in all areas of well-being research. It covers topics referring to both the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives characterizing well-being studies. The former includes the investigation of cognitive dimensions such as satisfaction with life, and positive affect and emotions. The latter includes the study of constructs and processes related to optimal psychological functioning, such as meaning and purpose in life, character strengths, personal growth, resilience, optimism, hope, and self-determination. In addition to contributions on appraisal of life-as-a-whole, the journal accepts papers investigating these topics in relation to specific domains, such as family, education, physical and mental health, and work. The journal welcomes high-quality theoretical and empirical submissions in the fields of economics, psychology and sociology, as well as contributions from researchers in the domains of education, medicine, philosophy and other related fields. The Journal of Happiness Studies provides a forum for three main areas in happiness research: 1) theoretical conceptualizations of well-being, happiness and the good life; 2) empirical investigation of well-being and happiness in different populations, contexts and cultures; 3) methodological advancements and development of new assessment instruments. The journal addresses the conceptualization, operationalization and measurement of happiness and well-being dimensions, as well as the individual, socio-economic and cultural factors that may interact with them as determinants or outcomes. Central Questions include, but are not limited to: Conceptualization: What meanings are denoted by terms like happiness and well-being? How do these fit in with broader conceptions of the good life? Operationalization and Measurement: Which methods can be used to assess how people feel about life? How to operationalize a new construct or an understudied dimension in the well-being domain? What are the best measures for investigating specific well-being related constructs and dimensions? Prevalence and causality Do individuals belonging to different populations and cultures vary in their well-being ratings? How does individual well-being relate to social and economic phenomena (characteristics, circumstances, behavior, events, and policies)? What are the personal, social and economic determinants and causes of individual well-being dimensions? Evaluation: What are the consequences of well-being for individual development and socio-economic progress? Are individual happiness and well-being worthwhile goals for governments and policy makers? Does well-being represent a useful parameter to orient planning in physical and mental healthcare, and in public health? Interdisciplinary studies: How has the study of happiness developed within and across disciplines? Can we link philosophical thought and empirical research? What are the biological correlates of well-being dimensions?
期刊最新文献
Publisher Correction: Happiness and Single Parenthood: A Literature Review Using an Online Findings Archive Subjective Inequality and Well-being in South Korea: Generational Variations in the Mediating and Moderating Effects of Social Connectedness Savoring is the Key to Happiness: The Effects of Consumption Type, Savoring, and Materialism on Well-being Subjective Well-Being and Voting for Protest Parties. A Mediation Analysis for Election Survey Data From Belgium, 2024 Purpose as a Psychological Need: Evaluation Against Established Criteria, Development of a Measure, and Empirical Evidence for a Link to Well-being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1