Giovanni Muscas, Eleonora Visocchi, Alberto Parenti, Federico Capelli, Mirko Petti, Alice Esposito, Enrico Fainardi, Isacco Desideri, Lorenzo Livi, Alessandro Della Puppa
{"title":"共聚焦激光内镜界面的手术显微镜场内可视化(蔡司CONVIVO®)。","authors":"Giovanni Muscas, Eleonora Visocchi, Alberto Parenti, Federico Capelli, Mirko Petti, Alice Esposito, Enrico Fainardi, Isacco Desideri, Lorenzo Livi, Alessandro Della Puppa","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Using confocal endomicroscopy (CLE) in neurosurgery holds the potential for intraoperative diagnosis and correct identification of tumor margins. Still, the correct employment of such a promising technique requires either an external dedicated person to interact with the neurosurgeon during the operation to check the quality of the acquired images or the operator to look directly and frequently outside of the operative field while maintaining the confocal microscopy probe in the surgical cave, thus interrupting the surgical flow, potentially disturbing the correct execution of surgical maneuvers and hindering a correct image acquisition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To overcome this problem, we integrated the confocal microscopy interface (Zeiss CONVIVO®) into the surgical view through the operative microscope (Heads-up display). We enrolled patients undergoing surgery with the use of CLE for different pathologies, and we randomly allocated them to be operated with the heads-up display integration or without it. The mean CLE employment time and the number of usable and nonusable captures were annotated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients were enrolled of which 12 patients underwent the procedure without the heads-up integration (54.5%) and 10 (45.5%) with it. The mean usage time of the CONVIVO® was 137 (±134) seconds, 61.1 (±38) seconds for the heads-up display group, and 201.6 (±154.1) seconds for the non-heads-up display group ( P = .01). The heads-up display group showed a higher proportion of usable images (11 [±4] vs 50 [±37], 21.7%) than the non-heads-up display group (30 [±21] vs 163 [±33], 18.4%), although nonsignificant ( P = .06). A significant influence of the intraoperative visualization on overall employment of CLE and a reduced number of images collected (611 vs 2139; P = .007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By allowing the operator to check the quality of the images directly while still looking inside the operating field, better-quality images and a reduced number of unemployable captures are obtained, resulting in more efficient and less time-consuming use of intraoperative confocal microscopy, ultimately leading to reduced operative length.</p>","PeriodicalId":54254,"journal":{"name":"Operative Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"860-864"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operative Microscope In-Field Visualization of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy Interface (Zeiss CONVIVO®).\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Muscas, Eleonora Visocchi, Alberto Parenti, Federico Capelli, Mirko Petti, Alice Esposito, Enrico Fainardi, Isacco Desideri, Lorenzo Livi, Alessandro Della Puppa\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/ons.0000000000001560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Using confocal endomicroscopy (CLE) in neurosurgery holds the potential for intraoperative diagnosis and correct identification of tumor margins. Still, the correct employment of such a promising technique requires either an external dedicated person to interact with the neurosurgeon during the operation to check the quality of the acquired images or the operator to look directly and frequently outside of the operative field while maintaining the confocal microscopy probe in the surgical cave, thus interrupting the surgical flow, potentially disturbing the correct execution of surgical maneuvers and hindering a correct image acquisition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To overcome this problem, we integrated the confocal microscopy interface (Zeiss CONVIVO®) into the surgical view through the operative microscope (Heads-up display). We enrolled patients undergoing surgery with the use of CLE for different pathologies, and we randomly allocated them to be operated with the heads-up display integration or without it. The mean CLE employment time and the number of usable and nonusable captures were annotated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients were enrolled of which 12 patients underwent the procedure without the heads-up integration (54.5%) and 10 (45.5%) with it. The mean usage time of the CONVIVO® was 137 (±134) seconds, 61.1 (±38) seconds for the heads-up display group, and 201.6 (±154.1) seconds for the non-heads-up display group ( P = .01). The heads-up display group showed a higher proportion of usable images (11 [±4] vs 50 [±37], 21.7%) than the non-heads-up display group (30 [±21] vs 163 [±33], 18.4%), although nonsignificant ( P = .06). A significant influence of the intraoperative visualization on overall employment of CLE and a reduced number of images collected (611 vs 2139; P = .007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By allowing the operator to check the quality of the images directly while still looking inside the operating field, better-quality images and a reduced number of unemployable captures are obtained, resulting in more efficient and less time-consuming use of intraoperative confocal microscopy, ultimately leading to reduced operative length.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"860-864\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001560\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001560","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:在神经外科手术中使用共聚焦内镜(CLE)具有术中诊断和正确识别肿瘤边缘的潜力。然而,正确使用这种有前途的技术需要外部专门人员在手术过程中与神经外科医生互动,以检查所获取图像的质量,或者操作员在将共聚焦显微镜探头保持在手术腔内的同时,直接并频繁地观察手术视野外,从而中断手术流程,可能干扰手术操作的正确执行并阻碍正确的图像获取。方法:为了克服这一问题,我们通过手术显微镜(平视显示)将共聚焦显微镜界面(蔡司CONVIVO®)集成到手术视图中。我们招募了因不同病理而使用CLE进行手术的患者,我们随机分配他们进行整合抬头显示或不整合抬头显示的手术。对平均CLE使用时间和可用和不可使用捕获的数量进行了注释。结果:共纳入22例患者,其中12例(54.5%)行无抬头整合术,10例(45.5%)行抬头整合术。CONVIVO®的平均使用时间为137(±134)秒,平视组为61.1(±38)秒,非平视组为201.6(±154.1)秒(P = 0.01)。平视显示器组显示的可用图像比例(11[±4]比50[±37],21.7%)高于非平视显示器组(30[±21]比163[±33],18.4%),尽管无统计学意义(P = 0.06)。术中可视化对CLE整体使用的显著影响和收集图像数量的减少(611 vs 2139;P = .007)。结论:通过允许操作者在直视手术视野的同时直接检查图像质量,可以获得更好的图像质量,减少不可使用的捕获次数,从而提高术中共聚焦显微镜的使用效率,减少使用时间,最终缩短手术时间。
Background and objectives: Using confocal endomicroscopy (CLE) in neurosurgery holds the potential for intraoperative diagnosis and correct identification of tumor margins. Still, the correct employment of such a promising technique requires either an external dedicated person to interact with the neurosurgeon during the operation to check the quality of the acquired images or the operator to look directly and frequently outside of the operative field while maintaining the confocal microscopy probe in the surgical cave, thus interrupting the surgical flow, potentially disturbing the correct execution of surgical maneuvers and hindering a correct image acquisition.
Methods: To overcome this problem, we integrated the confocal microscopy interface (Zeiss CONVIVO®) into the surgical view through the operative microscope (Heads-up display). We enrolled patients undergoing surgery with the use of CLE for different pathologies, and we randomly allocated them to be operated with the heads-up display integration or without it. The mean CLE employment time and the number of usable and nonusable captures were annotated.
Results: Twenty-two patients were enrolled of which 12 patients underwent the procedure without the heads-up integration (54.5%) and 10 (45.5%) with it. The mean usage time of the CONVIVO® was 137 (±134) seconds, 61.1 (±38) seconds for the heads-up display group, and 201.6 (±154.1) seconds for the non-heads-up display group ( P = .01). The heads-up display group showed a higher proportion of usable images (11 [±4] vs 50 [±37], 21.7%) than the non-heads-up display group (30 [±21] vs 163 [±33], 18.4%), although nonsignificant ( P = .06). A significant influence of the intraoperative visualization on overall employment of CLE and a reduced number of images collected (611 vs 2139; P = .007).
Conclusion: By allowing the operator to check the quality of the images directly while still looking inside the operating field, better-quality images and a reduced number of unemployable captures are obtained, resulting in more efficient and less time-consuming use of intraoperative confocal microscopy, ultimately leading to reduced operative length.
期刊介绍:
Operative Neurosurgery is a bi-monthly, unique publication focusing exclusively on surgical technique and devices, providing practical, skill-enhancing guidance to its readers. Complementing the clinical and research studies published in Neurosurgery, Operative Neurosurgery brings the reader technical material that highlights operative procedures, anatomy, instrumentation, devices, and technology. Operative Neurosurgery is the practical resource for cutting-edge material that brings the surgeon the most up to date literature on operative practice and technique