PPAR激动剂治疗原发性胆管炎的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY BMC Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1186/s12876-025-03821-2
Behrad Saeedian, Nastaran Babajani, Tannaz Bagheri, Fatemeh Ojaghi Shirmard, Seyed Morteza Pourfaraji
{"title":"PPAR激动剂治疗原发性胆管炎的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Behrad Saeedian, Nastaran Babajani, Tannaz Bagheri, Fatemeh Ojaghi Shirmard, Seyed Morteza Pourfaraji","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-03821-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic, progressive autoimmune liver disease. Some patients with PBC do not adequately respond to Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) as a first-line treatment, putting them at an increased risk of disease progression. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR) agonists are emerging as promising therapeutic options for PBC. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of PPAR agonists in treating PBC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) investigating the use of PPAR agonists in combination with UDCA in patients with PBC, compared to UDCA alone. Mean differences (MD) for continuous variables and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous variables were calculated to compare treatment response endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 studies with 1219 PBC cases were included in the current review. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels had a significantly greater decline in PPAR and UDCA arms than in UDCA alone (MD - 131.15, 95% CI - 155.95 to - 106.36). Furthermore, in combination therapy arms, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) (MD - 55.69, 95% CI - 76.26 to - 35.13) and total bilirubin (MD - 0.08, 95% CI - 0.14 to - 0.03) were significantly lower than in the UDCA alone group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study demonstrates that combining UDCA and PPAR agonists effectively reduces ALP, GGT, and Bilirubin levels, crucial markers for effective therapy in PBC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"230"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of PPAR agonists in primary biliary cholangitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Behrad Saeedian, Nastaran Babajani, Tannaz Bagheri, Fatemeh Ojaghi Shirmard, Seyed Morteza Pourfaraji\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12876-025-03821-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic, progressive autoimmune liver disease. Some patients with PBC do not adequately respond to Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) as a first-line treatment, putting them at an increased risk of disease progression. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR) agonists are emerging as promising therapeutic options for PBC. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of PPAR agonists in treating PBC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) investigating the use of PPAR agonists in combination with UDCA in patients with PBC, compared to UDCA alone. Mean differences (MD) for continuous variables and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous variables were calculated to compare treatment response endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 studies with 1219 PBC cases were included in the current review. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels had a significantly greater decline in PPAR and UDCA arms than in UDCA alone (MD - 131.15, 95% CI - 155.95 to - 106.36). Furthermore, in combination therapy arms, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) (MD - 55.69, 95% CI - 76.26 to - 35.13) and total bilirubin (MD - 0.08, 95% CI - 0.14 to - 0.03) were significantly lower than in the UDCA alone group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study demonstrates that combining UDCA and PPAR agonists effectively reduces ALP, GGT, and Bilirubin levels, crucial markers for effective therapy in PBC patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980239/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03821-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03821-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:原发性胆道胆管炎(PBC)是一种慢性进行性自身免疫性肝病。一些PBC患者对熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)作为一线治疗没有充分的反应,使他们处于疾病进展的风险增加。过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体(PPAR)激动剂正在成为PBC的有希望的治疗选择。我们的目的是研究PPAR激动剂治疗PBC患者的有效性和安全性。方法:检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library和Clinicaltrials.gov,研究PPAR激动剂联合UDCA治疗PBC患者的随机对照试验(RCTs),并与单独使用UDCA进行比较。计算连续变量的平均差异(MD)和二分类变量的风险比(RR)来比较治疗反应终点。结果:本综述共纳入17项研究,1219例PBC病例。碱性磷酸酶(ALP)水平在PPAR和UDCA组的下降幅度明显大于UDCA组(MD - 131.15, 95% CI - 155.95至- 106.36)。此外,在联合治疗组,γ -谷氨酰转移酶(GGT) (MD - 55.69, 95% CI - 76.26至- 35.13)和总胆红素(MD - 0.08, 95% CI - 0.14至- 0.03)显著低于UDCA单独治疗组。结论:目前的研究表明,联合UDCA和PPAR激动剂可有效降低PBC患者的ALP、GGT和胆红素水平,这是有效治疗PBC患者的关键指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of PPAR agonists in primary biliary cholangitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background and aims: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic, progressive autoimmune liver disease. Some patients with PBC do not adequately respond to Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) as a first-line treatment, putting them at an increased risk of disease progression. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR) agonists are emerging as promising therapeutic options for PBC. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of PPAR agonists in treating PBC patients.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) investigating the use of PPAR agonists in combination with UDCA in patients with PBC, compared to UDCA alone. Mean differences (MD) for continuous variables and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous variables were calculated to compare treatment response endpoints.

Results: A total of 17 studies with 1219 PBC cases were included in the current review. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels had a significantly greater decline in PPAR and UDCA arms than in UDCA alone (MD - 131.15, 95% CI - 155.95 to - 106.36). Furthermore, in combination therapy arms, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) (MD - 55.69, 95% CI - 76.26 to - 35.13) and total bilirubin (MD - 0.08, 95% CI - 0.14 to - 0.03) were significantly lower than in the UDCA alone group.

Conclusions: The current study demonstrates that combining UDCA and PPAR agonists effectively reduces ALP, GGT, and Bilirubin levels, crucial markers for effective therapy in PBC patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
A network meta-analysis of strategies for endoscopic submucosal dissection procedures from the perspectives of efficacy, duration and safety. One- versus two-sample fecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of participation, diagnostic performance, and cost-effectiveness. Inflammatory bowel disease outcomes among hospitalized homeless individuals. Prevalence and clinical determinants of diabetic gastroparesis in type 2 diabetes: a symptom- and scintigraphy-based cross-sectional study. Short-chain fatty acids of intestinal origin attenuate protein-bound uremic toxins in patients with chronic kidney disease by protecting the intestinal barrier: a pooled analysis of multiple studies with individualized intervention strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1