Serena Bertozzi, Ambrogio Pietro Londero, Giovanni Vendramelli, Maria Orsaria, Laura Mariuzzi, Enrico Pegolo, Carla Di Loreto, Carla Cedolini, Vincenzo Della Mea
{"title":"乳腺癌妇女远处转移危险因素的回顾性病例队列研究","authors":"Serena Bertozzi, Ambrogio Pietro Londero, Giovanni Vendramelli, Maria Orsaria, Laura Mariuzzi, Enrico Pegolo, Carla Di Loreto, Carla Cedolini, Vincenzo Della Mea","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with the development of metastases in breast cancer patients, to investigate survival rates, and the relationship between local recurrences and distant metastases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective case-cohort study included women with breast cancer who were treated at a certified Breast Unit between 2001 and 2015. Cases who developed distant metastases were compared to controls based on diagnosis year, stage, and age at diagnosis. Comprehensive information on patient characteristics, tumor biology, and treatment options was gathered.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study included 412 patients who developed distant metastases and 433 controls who remained metastasis-free over a median follow-up of 150 months (interquartile range 87–202). The 20-year overall survival was 99.23% for the control group and 23.62% for those with metastasis (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Significant risk factors for metastasis included lobular invasive carcinoma (odds ratio (OR) 2.26, <i>p</i> < 0.001), triple-negative subtype (OR 4.06, <i>p</i> = 0.002), high tumor grade (OR 2.62, <i>p</i> = 0.004), larger tumor size (OR 1.02, <i>p</i> < 0.001), lymph node involvement (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and loco-regional recurrence (OR 4.32, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Progesterone receptor (PR) expression was protective (OR 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.34–0.81, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Machine learning models supported these findings, though their clinical significance was limited.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Lobular invasive carcinoma, specific tumor subtypes, high grade, large tumor size, lymph node involvement, and loco-regional recurrence are all significant risk factors for distant metastasis, whereas PR expression is protective. The potential of machine learning in predicting metastasis was explored, showing promise for future personalized risk assessment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70903","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective Case-Cohort Study on Risk Factors for Developing Distant Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Serena Bertozzi, Ambrogio Pietro Londero, Giovanni Vendramelli, Maria Orsaria, Laura Mariuzzi, Enrico Pegolo, Carla Di Loreto, Carla Cedolini, Vincenzo Della Mea\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cam4.70903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with the development of metastases in breast cancer patients, to investigate survival rates, and the relationship between local recurrences and distant metastases.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This retrospective case-cohort study included women with breast cancer who were treated at a certified Breast Unit between 2001 and 2015. Cases who developed distant metastases were compared to controls based on diagnosis year, stage, and age at diagnosis. Comprehensive information on patient characteristics, tumor biology, and treatment options was gathered.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study included 412 patients who developed distant metastases and 433 controls who remained metastasis-free over a median follow-up of 150 months (interquartile range 87–202). The 20-year overall survival was 99.23% for the control group and 23.62% for those with metastasis (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Significant risk factors for metastasis included lobular invasive carcinoma (odds ratio (OR) 2.26, <i>p</i> < 0.001), triple-negative subtype (OR 4.06, <i>p</i> = 0.002), high tumor grade (OR 2.62, <i>p</i> = 0.004), larger tumor size (OR 1.02, <i>p</i> < 0.001), lymph node involvement (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and loco-regional recurrence (OR 4.32, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Progesterone receptor (PR) expression was protective (OR 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.34–0.81, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Machine learning models supported these findings, though their clinical significance was limited.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Lobular invasive carcinoma, specific tumor subtypes, high grade, large tumor size, lymph node involvement, and loco-regional recurrence are all significant risk factors for distant metastasis, whereas PR expression is protective. The potential of machine learning in predicting metastasis was explored, showing promise for future personalized risk assessment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70903\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70903\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70903","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的探讨乳腺癌患者发生转移的相关危险因素,探讨乳腺癌患者的生存率以及局部复发与远处转移的关系。方法:本回顾性病例队列研究纳入了2001年至2015年间在一家认证的乳腺部门接受治疗的乳腺癌妇女。根据诊断年份、分期和诊断年龄,将发生远处转移的病例与对照组进行比较。收集了有关患者特征、肿瘤生物学和治疗方案的综合信息。该研究包括412例远处转移患者和433例未发生转移的对照组,中位随访时间为150个月(四分位数范围87-202)。对照组20年总生存率为99.23%,转移组20年总生存率为23.62% (p < 0.01)。发生转移的重要危险因素包括小叶浸润性癌(比值比(OR) 2.26, p < 0.001)、三阴性亚型(OR 4.06, p = 0.002)、高肿瘤分级(OR 2.62, p = 0.004)、较大肿瘤大小(OR 1.02, p < 0.001)、淋巴结累及(p < 0.001)和局部区域复发(OR 4.32, p < 0.001)。孕激素受体(PR)的表达具有保护作用(OR 0.52, 95%可信区间0.34 ~ 0.81,p = 0.003)。机器学习模型支持这些发现,尽管它们的临床意义有限。结论小叶浸润性癌、特异性肿瘤亚型、肿瘤分级高、肿瘤体积大、淋巴结受损伤、局部区域复发均是发生远处转移的重要危险因素,而PR表达具有保护作用。研究人员探索了机器学习在预测转移中的潜力,为未来的个性化风险评估带来了希望。
Retrospective Case-Cohort Study on Risk Factors for Developing Distant Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer
Objective
This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with the development of metastases in breast cancer patients, to investigate survival rates, and the relationship between local recurrences and distant metastases.
Methods
This retrospective case-cohort study included women with breast cancer who were treated at a certified Breast Unit between 2001 and 2015. Cases who developed distant metastases were compared to controls based on diagnosis year, stage, and age at diagnosis. Comprehensive information on patient characteristics, tumor biology, and treatment options was gathered.
Results
The study included 412 patients who developed distant metastases and 433 controls who remained metastasis-free over a median follow-up of 150 months (interquartile range 87–202). The 20-year overall survival was 99.23% for the control group and 23.62% for those with metastasis (p < 0.01). Significant risk factors for metastasis included lobular invasive carcinoma (odds ratio (OR) 2.26, p < 0.001), triple-negative subtype (OR 4.06, p = 0.002), high tumor grade (OR 2.62, p = 0.004), larger tumor size (OR 1.02, p < 0.001), lymph node involvement (p < 0.001), and loco-regional recurrence (OR 4.32, p < 0.001). Progesterone receptor (PR) expression was protective (OR 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.34–0.81, p = 0.003). Machine learning models supported these findings, though their clinical significance was limited.
Conclusions
Lobular invasive carcinoma, specific tumor subtypes, high grade, large tumor size, lymph node involvement, and loco-regional recurrence are all significant risk factors for distant metastasis, whereas PR expression is protective. The potential of machine learning in predicting metastasis was explored, showing promise for future personalized risk assessment.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas:
Clinical Cancer Research
Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations
Cancer Biology:
Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery.
Cancer Prevention:
Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach.
Bioinformatics:
Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers.
Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.