一种新的基于人工智能的方法来预测治疗的非特异性反应

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatry Research Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-19 DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116506
Clotilde Guidetti , Maurizio Fava , Paolo L. Manfredi , Marco Pappagallo , Roberto Gomeni
{"title":"一种新的基于人工智能的方法来预测治疗的非特异性反应","authors":"Clotilde Guidetti ,&nbsp;Maurizio Fava ,&nbsp;Paolo L. Manfredi ,&nbsp;Marco Pappagallo ,&nbsp;Roberto Gomeni","doi":"10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Non-specific response to treatment (NSRT) is the primary contributor to the failure of randomized clinical trials in major depressive disorder (MDD). The objective of this study is to develop artificial neural network (ANN) models to predict the individual probability for NSRT. Pre-randomization data from a failed antidepressant trial were considered as potential predictors of the NSRT probability (prob-NSRT) using the response endpoint in subjects randomized to placebo. The inverse of the individual prob-NSRT (NSRT propensity score) was used as a weight in the mixed-effects model applied to assess treatment effect (TE). The comparison of the results obtained with and without the NSRT propensity score indicated that the weighted analyses provided an estimate of TE significantly larger than the conventional analyses. The propensity score weighted (PSW) analysis, adjusting for inter-individual variability in prob-NSRT, enhanced signal detection of TE. These findings support the potential role of PSW methodology for analyzing RCTs and determining TE. However, external validation of these ANN models in at least one independent trial is needed before advocating regulatory or broader clinical use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20819,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research","volume":"348 ","pages":"Article 116506"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel artificial intelligence-based methodology to predict non-specific response to treatment\",\"authors\":\"Clotilde Guidetti ,&nbsp;Maurizio Fava ,&nbsp;Paolo L. Manfredi ,&nbsp;Marco Pappagallo ,&nbsp;Roberto Gomeni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Non-specific response to treatment (NSRT) is the primary contributor to the failure of randomized clinical trials in major depressive disorder (MDD). The objective of this study is to develop artificial neural network (ANN) models to predict the individual probability for NSRT. Pre-randomization data from a failed antidepressant trial were considered as potential predictors of the NSRT probability (prob-NSRT) using the response endpoint in subjects randomized to placebo. The inverse of the individual prob-NSRT (NSRT propensity score) was used as a weight in the mixed-effects model applied to assess treatment effect (TE). The comparison of the results obtained with and without the NSRT propensity score indicated that the weighted analyses provided an estimate of TE significantly larger than the conventional analyses. The propensity score weighted (PSW) analysis, adjusting for inter-individual variability in prob-NSRT, enhanced signal detection of TE. These findings support the potential role of PSW methodology for analyzing RCTs and determining TE. However, external validation of these ANN models in at least one independent trial is needed before advocating regulatory or broader clinical use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry Research\",\"volume\":\"348 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178125001544\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178125001544","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非特异性治疗反应(NSRT)是导致重度抑郁症(MDD)随机临床试验失败的主要原因。本研究的目的是建立人工神经网络(ANN)模型来预测NSRT的个体概率。从一项失败的抗抑郁药物试验中获得的预随机化数据被认为是随机分配到安慰剂组的受试者使用应答终点的NSRT概率(probo -NSRT)的潜在预测因子。在用于评估治疗效果(TE)的混合效应模型中,使用个体probi -NSRT的反比(NSRT倾向得分)作为权重。使用和不使用NSRT倾向评分的结果比较表明,加权分析提供的TE估计值明显大于常规分析。倾向评分加权(PSW)分析,调整了probo - nsrt的个体间变异性,增强了TE的信号检测。这些发现支持PSW方法在分析随机对照试验和确定TE方面的潜在作用。然而,在提倡监管或更广泛的临床应用之前,需要在至少一项独立试验中对这些人工神经网络模型进行外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A novel artificial intelligence-based methodology to predict non-specific response to treatment
Non-specific response to treatment (NSRT) is the primary contributor to the failure of randomized clinical trials in major depressive disorder (MDD). The objective of this study is to develop artificial neural network (ANN) models to predict the individual probability for NSRT. Pre-randomization data from a failed antidepressant trial were considered as potential predictors of the NSRT probability (prob-NSRT) using the response endpoint in subjects randomized to placebo. The inverse of the individual prob-NSRT (NSRT propensity score) was used as a weight in the mixed-effects model applied to assess treatment effect (TE). The comparison of the results obtained with and without the NSRT propensity score indicated that the weighted analyses provided an estimate of TE significantly larger than the conventional analyses. The propensity score weighted (PSW) analysis, adjusting for inter-individual variability in prob-NSRT, enhanced signal detection of TE. These findings support the potential role of PSW methodology for analyzing RCTs and determining TE. However, external validation of these ANN models in at least one independent trial is needed before advocating regulatory or broader clinical use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry Research
Psychiatry Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
527
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Psychiatry Research offers swift publication of comprehensive research reports and reviews within the field of psychiatry. The scope of the journal encompasses: Biochemical, physiological, neuroanatomic, genetic, neurocognitive, and psychosocial determinants of psychiatric disorders. Diagnostic assessments of psychiatric disorders. Evaluations that pursue hypotheses about the cause or causes of psychiatric diseases. Evaluations of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic psychiatric treatments. Basic neuroscience studies related to animal or neurochemical models for psychiatric disorders. Methodological advances, such as instrumentation, clinical scales, and assays directly applicable to psychiatric research.
期刊最新文献
Associations of psychosocial factors with suicidal ideation from adolescence to young adulthood: A 14-year study in Taiwan Toxic exposure and rates of suicidal thoughts and behaviors among U.S. military veterans Neurotransmitter dysregulation in depression, anxiety, and suicidality: From synaptic dysfunction to cellular pathogenesis Prescription opioid use and 12-month depression trajectories Key factors associated with social anxiety symptoms among Chinese adolescents: An exploration via machine learning models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1