复方新诺明与头孢氨苄治疗呼吸道感染疗效比较研究。

Pharmatherapeutica Pub Date : 1988-01-01
J M Phadtare, R Y Rangnekar
{"title":"复方新诺明与头孢氨苄治疗呼吸道感染疗效比较研究。","authors":"J M Phadtare,&nbsp;R Y Rangnekar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An open, randomized trial was carried out in 50 patients with severe respiratory tract infections due to various pathogens to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of co-trimoxazole and cephalexin. Patients were divided into two groups, each of 25, and treated for 15 days with either 1 tablet of co-trimoxazole (160 mg trimethoprim plus 800 mg sulphamethoxazole) every 12 hours or 1 capsule of cephalexin (500 mg) every 6 hours. The results of bacteriological and radiological investigations before and after 10 and 15 days of treatment showed that, although response to cephalexin was somewhat faster, both drugs were equally effective and well-tolerated over the full treatment period and there was good correlation between the laboratory findings as well as clinical improvement in symptoms. Taking the cost-benefit ratio into consideration, it is suggested that co-trimoxazole should be used for first-line therapy in respiratory tract infections and cephalexin only as a reserve drug for infections which do not respond to the routine use of co-trimoxazole.</p>","PeriodicalId":19862,"journal":{"name":"Pharmatherapeutica","volume":"5 3","pages":"183-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of the efficacy of co-trimoxazole and cephalexin in respiratory infections.\",\"authors\":\"J M Phadtare,&nbsp;R Y Rangnekar\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An open, randomized trial was carried out in 50 patients with severe respiratory tract infections due to various pathogens to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of co-trimoxazole and cephalexin. Patients were divided into two groups, each of 25, and treated for 15 days with either 1 tablet of co-trimoxazole (160 mg trimethoprim plus 800 mg sulphamethoxazole) every 12 hours or 1 capsule of cephalexin (500 mg) every 6 hours. The results of bacteriological and radiological investigations before and after 10 and 15 days of treatment showed that, although response to cephalexin was somewhat faster, both drugs were equally effective and well-tolerated over the full treatment period and there was good correlation between the laboratory findings as well as clinical improvement in symptoms. Taking the cost-benefit ratio into consideration, it is suggested that co-trimoxazole should be used for first-line therapy in respiratory tract infections and cephalexin only as a reserve drug for infections which do not respond to the routine use of co-trimoxazole.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmatherapeutica\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"183-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmatherapeutica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmatherapeutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一项开放的随机试验在50例因各种病原体引起的严重呼吸道感染患者中进行,以比较复方新诺明和头孢氨苄的有效性和耐受性。患者分为两组,每组25人,每组治疗15天,每12小时服用1片复方新诺明(甲氧苄啶160 mg +磺胺甲恶唑800 mg)或每6小时服用1粒头孢氨苄(500 mg)。治疗前后10天和15天的细菌学和放射学检查结果显示,虽然头孢氨苄的反应稍快,但两种药物在整个治疗期间同样有效且耐受性良好,实验室检查结果与临床症状改善之间存在良好的相关性。考虑到成本效益比,建议将复方新诺明用于呼吸道感染的一线治疗,头孢氨苄仅作为常规应用复方新诺明无效感染的备用药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative study of the efficacy of co-trimoxazole and cephalexin in respiratory infections.

An open, randomized trial was carried out in 50 patients with severe respiratory tract infections due to various pathogens to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of co-trimoxazole and cephalexin. Patients were divided into two groups, each of 25, and treated for 15 days with either 1 tablet of co-trimoxazole (160 mg trimethoprim plus 800 mg sulphamethoxazole) every 12 hours or 1 capsule of cephalexin (500 mg) every 6 hours. The results of bacteriological and radiological investigations before and after 10 and 15 days of treatment showed that, although response to cephalexin was somewhat faster, both drugs were equally effective and well-tolerated over the full treatment period and there was good correlation between the laboratory findings as well as clinical improvement in symptoms. Taking the cost-benefit ratio into consideration, it is suggested that co-trimoxazole should be used for first-line therapy in respiratory tract infections and cephalexin only as a reserve drug for infections which do not respond to the routine use of co-trimoxazole.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flupenthixol and fluvoxamine in mild to moderate depression: a comparison in general practice. Treatment of chronic occlusive arterial disease with pentoxifylline: changes in clinical and haemodynamic parameters. Effects of penbutolol on plasma atrial natriuretic peptide and antidiuretic hormone levels before and after exercise: a double-blind comparison against placebo. Absence of interaction between ramipril, a new ACE-inhibitor, and phenprocoumon, an anticoagulant agent. Zuclopenthixol and haloperidol/levomepromazine in the treatment of elderly patients with symptoms of aggressiveness and agitation: a double-blind, multi-centre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1