阿司匹林,扑热息痛和非甾体抗炎药。副作用的比较回顾。

P D Fowler
{"title":"阿司匹林,扑热息痛和非甾体抗炎药。副作用的比较回顾。","authors":"P D Fowler","doi":"10.1007/BF03259953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) effectively control the symptoms of many of the rheumatic diseases although they have little effect on the underlying causes. Their effect is mainly on the mediators of the inflammatory process. Unfortunately, these mediators have important physiological roles in the maintenance of health, particularly in the gastrointestinal tract and the kidney, so that their inhibition results in many unwanted reactions of varying severity. The mechanisms underlying these reactions are described. Their occurrence varies, both qualitatively and quantitatively, and an attempt is made to assess these differences, although it may be that they are related directly to differences in dosage and therapeutic efficacy. In addition, immunologically mediated adverse reactions occur. These mechanisms are outlined and related to the clinical picture. There are considerable differences in frequency of reactions between the compounds: in particular there is a wide variation in the rate of dermatological reactions of this type. Agranulocytosis has been particularly associated with the pyrazolone compounds, although it has been reported with most others. Aplastic anaemia, which may not be an immune-mediated reaction, is also thought of as a pyrazolone reaction, but the incidence with indomethacin approaches a similar level. Although all drugs analysed may cause hepatic reactions, these are rare except with the now withdrawn benoxaprofen. Several types of immunologically mediated renal reactions occur and these rarities are also described. Paracetamol does not have any effect on the inflammatory mediators. Anxieties about this substance relates to the parent compound phenacetin and its necrotic effect on the renal papillae. There is extensive literature on this subject concerning not only paracetamol, but also aspirin and other NSAIDs. This is also assessed and summarised. The danger of paracetamol as a direct hepatic toxin in self-poisoning is discussed. Novel NSAIDs are introduced and others withdrawn with frequent and monotonous regularity. Sometimes the reasons have some medical or scientific plausibility, but often they are over-reactions by registration authorities or pharmaceutical companies in response to uninformed media publicity. The problems of the numerically and scientifically accurate collection and assessment of adverse reaction data are legion and as a result useful agents have been lost. Some of these difficulties are described, and some non-drug 'adverse reactions' are described.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77748,"journal":{"name":"Medical toxicology and adverse drug experience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03259953","citationCount":"57","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aspirin, paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A comparative review of side effects.\",\"authors\":\"P D Fowler\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF03259953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) effectively control the symptoms of many of the rheumatic diseases although they have little effect on the underlying causes. Their effect is mainly on the mediators of the inflammatory process. Unfortunately, these mediators have important physiological roles in the maintenance of health, particularly in the gastrointestinal tract and the kidney, so that their inhibition results in many unwanted reactions of varying severity. The mechanisms underlying these reactions are described. Their occurrence varies, both qualitatively and quantitatively, and an attempt is made to assess these differences, although it may be that they are related directly to differences in dosage and therapeutic efficacy. In addition, immunologically mediated adverse reactions occur. These mechanisms are outlined and related to the clinical picture. There are considerable differences in frequency of reactions between the compounds: in particular there is a wide variation in the rate of dermatological reactions of this type. Agranulocytosis has been particularly associated with the pyrazolone compounds, although it has been reported with most others. Aplastic anaemia, which may not be an immune-mediated reaction, is also thought of as a pyrazolone reaction, but the incidence with indomethacin approaches a similar level. Although all drugs analysed may cause hepatic reactions, these are rare except with the now withdrawn benoxaprofen. Several types of immunologically mediated renal reactions occur and these rarities are also described. Paracetamol does not have any effect on the inflammatory mediators. Anxieties about this substance relates to the parent compound phenacetin and its necrotic effect on the renal papillae. There is extensive literature on this subject concerning not only paracetamol, but also aspirin and other NSAIDs. This is also assessed and summarised. The danger of paracetamol as a direct hepatic toxin in self-poisoning is discussed. Novel NSAIDs are introduced and others withdrawn with frequent and monotonous regularity. Sometimes the reasons have some medical or scientific plausibility, but often they are over-reactions by registration authorities or pharmaceutical companies in response to uninformed media publicity. The problems of the numerically and scientifically accurate collection and assessment of adverse reaction data are legion and as a result useful agents have been lost. Some of these difficulties are described, and some non-drug 'adverse reactions' are described.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical toxicology and adverse drug experience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03259953\",\"citationCount\":\"57\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical toxicology and adverse drug experience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03259953\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical toxicology and adverse drug experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03259953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57

摘要

非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)可以有效地控制许多风湿性疾病的症状,尽管它们对潜在的病因几乎没有影响。它们主要作用于炎症过程的介质。不幸的是,这些介质在维持健康方面具有重要的生理作用,特别是在胃肠道和肾脏中,因此它们的抑制会导致许多不同严重程度的不良反应。描述了这些反应背后的机制。它们的发生在质量和数量上各不相同,尽管它们可能与剂量和治疗效果的差异直接相关,但仍试图评估这些差异。此外,免疫介导的不良反应也会发生。这些机制概述和相关的临床图片。这两种化合物之间的反应频率有相当大的差异:特别是这种类型的皮肤反应的比率有很大的差异。粒细胞缺乏症特别与吡唑酮类化合物有关,尽管它与大多数其他化合物有关。再生障碍性贫血,可能不是免疫介导的反应,也被认为是吡唑酮反应,但吲哚美辛的发生率接近相似的水平。尽管所有被分析的药物都可能引起肝脏反应,但除了目前已被停用的苯诺卡洛芬外,这种情况很少见。几种类型的免疫介导的肾脏反应发生,这些罕见的也被描述。扑热息痛对炎症介质没有任何影响。对这种物质的焦虑与母体化合物非那西丁及其对肾乳头的坏死作用有关。关于这一主题的大量文献不仅涉及扑热息痛,还涉及阿司匹林和其他非甾体抗炎药。这也是评估和总结。讨论了扑热息痛作为直接肝毒素在自中毒中的危险性。新的非甾体抗炎药被引入,其他非甾体抗炎药以频繁和单调的规律被退出。有时,这些原因在医学或科学上有一定的合理性,但往往是注册当局或制药公司对不知情的媒体宣传的过度反应。在数字和科学上准确收集和评估不良反应数据的问题很多,结果导致有用的药物丢失。描述了其中一些困难,并描述了一些非药物“不良反应”。(摘要删节为400字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aspirin, paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A comparative review of side effects.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) effectively control the symptoms of many of the rheumatic diseases although they have little effect on the underlying causes. Their effect is mainly on the mediators of the inflammatory process. Unfortunately, these mediators have important physiological roles in the maintenance of health, particularly in the gastrointestinal tract and the kidney, so that their inhibition results in many unwanted reactions of varying severity. The mechanisms underlying these reactions are described. Their occurrence varies, both qualitatively and quantitatively, and an attempt is made to assess these differences, although it may be that they are related directly to differences in dosage and therapeutic efficacy. In addition, immunologically mediated adverse reactions occur. These mechanisms are outlined and related to the clinical picture. There are considerable differences in frequency of reactions between the compounds: in particular there is a wide variation in the rate of dermatological reactions of this type. Agranulocytosis has been particularly associated with the pyrazolone compounds, although it has been reported with most others. Aplastic anaemia, which may not be an immune-mediated reaction, is also thought of as a pyrazolone reaction, but the incidence with indomethacin approaches a similar level. Although all drugs analysed may cause hepatic reactions, these are rare except with the now withdrawn benoxaprofen. Several types of immunologically mediated renal reactions occur and these rarities are also described. Paracetamol does not have any effect on the inflammatory mediators. Anxieties about this substance relates to the parent compound phenacetin and its necrotic effect on the renal papillae. There is extensive literature on this subject concerning not only paracetamol, but also aspirin and other NSAIDs. This is also assessed and summarised. The danger of paracetamol as a direct hepatic toxin in self-poisoning is discussed. Novel NSAIDs are introduced and others withdrawn with frequent and monotonous regularity. Sometimes the reasons have some medical or scientific plausibility, but often they are over-reactions by registration authorities or pharmaceutical companies in response to uninformed media publicity. The problems of the numerically and scientifically accurate collection and assessment of adverse reaction data are legion and as a result useful agents have been lost. Some of these difficulties are described, and some non-drug 'adverse reactions' are described.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Poisoning due to class 1B antiarrhythmic drugs. Lignocaine, mexiletine and tocainide. Fulminant hyperkalaemia and multiple complications following ibuprofen overdose. Problems and pitfalls in the use of hyperbaric oxygen for the treatment of poisoned patients. A prolonged QTc interval. Is it an important effect of antiarrhythmic drugs? Clinical features and management of poisoning due to potassium chloride.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1