计算机断层扫描在主动脉夹层术前和术后评估中的应用。

M Landtman, L Kivisaari, C G Standertskjöld-Nordenstam, M Taavitsainen
{"title":"计算机断层扫描在主动脉夹层术前和术后评估中的应用。","authors":"M Landtman,&nbsp;L Kivisaari,&nbsp;C G Standertskjöld-Nordenstam,&nbsp;M Taavitsainen","doi":"10.1177/028418518602700304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thirty-seven patients with angiographically or operatively confirmed acute, chronic or postoperative aortic dissection were examined by means of dynamic CT and the results compared with those obtained by angiography and ultrasonography (US). The diagnostic accuracy was 87 per cent for CT, 97 per cent for angiography, and 76 per cent for US, although US was only available in less than half of the cases. The highest accuracy (95%) of CT was achieved in the pre-operative group, which is comparable with the 97 per cent accuracy achieved using angiography. Three patients in the postoperative group had false negative CTs, resulting in an overall accuracy of 82 per cent as compared with 100 per cent for angiography. Despite its diagnostic capacity, CT could not define the complete extent of dissection in four patients. The descending thoracic aorta was the area most difficult for CT examinations because of frequent artifacts in the images.</p>","PeriodicalId":7142,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica: diagnosis","volume":"27 3","pages":"273-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/028418518602700304","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computed tomography in pre- and postoperative evaluation of aortic dissection.\",\"authors\":\"M Landtman,&nbsp;L Kivisaari,&nbsp;C G Standertskjöld-Nordenstam,&nbsp;M Taavitsainen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/028418518602700304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Thirty-seven patients with angiographically or operatively confirmed acute, chronic or postoperative aortic dissection were examined by means of dynamic CT and the results compared with those obtained by angiography and ultrasonography (US). The diagnostic accuracy was 87 per cent for CT, 97 per cent for angiography, and 76 per cent for US, although US was only available in less than half of the cases. The highest accuracy (95%) of CT was achieved in the pre-operative group, which is comparable with the 97 per cent accuracy achieved using angiography. Three patients in the postoperative group had false negative CTs, resulting in an overall accuracy of 82 per cent as compared with 100 per cent for angiography. Despite its diagnostic capacity, CT could not define the complete extent of dissection in four patients. The descending thoracic aorta was the area most difficult for CT examinations because of frequent artifacts in the images.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta radiologica: diagnosis\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"273-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/028418518602700304\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta radiologica: diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/028418518602700304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica: diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/028418518602700304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文对37例经血管造影或手术证实的急性、慢性或术后主动脉夹层患者进行动态CT检查,并与血管造影和超声(US)检查结果进行比较。CT的诊断准确率为87%,血管造影为97%,超声为76%,尽管超声仅在不到一半的病例中可用。术前组CT的准确率最高(95%),而血管造影的准确率为97%。术后组有3例患者ct假阴性,总体准确率为82%,而血管造影的准确率为100%。尽管CT具有很强的诊断能力,但仍不能确定4例患者的完全剥离程度。胸降主动脉是CT检查中最困难的区域,因为图像中经常出现伪影。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Computed tomography in pre- and postoperative evaluation of aortic dissection.

Thirty-seven patients with angiographically or operatively confirmed acute, chronic or postoperative aortic dissection were examined by means of dynamic CT and the results compared with those obtained by angiography and ultrasonography (US). The diagnostic accuracy was 87 per cent for CT, 97 per cent for angiography, and 76 per cent for US, although US was only available in less than half of the cases. The highest accuracy (95%) of CT was achieved in the pre-operative group, which is comparable with the 97 per cent accuracy achieved using angiography. Three patients in the postoperative group had false negative CTs, resulting in an overall accuracy of 82 per cent as compared with 100 per cent for angiography. Despite its diagnostic capacity, CT could not define the complete extent of dissection in four patients. The descending thoracic aorta was the area most difficult for CT examinations because of frequent artifacts in the images.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Importance Du Volume Irradié Et Notion De Dose Dans Le Traitement Post-Opératoire Des Tumeurs Cérébrales Treatment of Neuroblastoma RADIATION LOAD TO THE GONADS IN DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURES Effect of Cyclophosphamide on Pain in Advanced Carcinoma of the Cervix Cesium 137 Burdens in the Canadian North
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1