骨髓移植治疗急性白血病。

Clinics in haematology Pub Date : 1986-08-01
R P Gale, R E Champlin
{"title":"骨髓移植治疗急性白血病。","authors":"R P Gale,&nbsp;R E Champlin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bone marrow transplantation is useful in AML. Results of chemotherapy and transplantation are compared in Table 4. Transplantation is the preferred treatment in individuals who fail chemotherapy. Transplantation is also likely to be superior or comparable to chemotherapy in individuals less than 30 years of age in first remission. Transplantation in older individuals in first remission is controversial, but it is unlikely that these results are inferior to results with chemotherapy. Transplants from donors other than HLA-identical siblings are less well investigated but may be a reasonable alternative in young individuals in first relapse or second remission, particularly if recipient and donor share most HLA antigens. Autotransplants are difficult to evaluate critically and should be considered investigational in individuals in second or later remission for whom a suitable donor is unavailable. Autotransplants in first remission should be restricted to controlled clinical trials, since their efficacy is otherwise inevaluable. It is uncertain whether in vitro treatment of the bone marrow is necessary in the context of autotransplantation; again, controlled trials are required. Bone marrow transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling is a useful therapy in individuals with ALL who relapse despite chemotherapy. Individuals undergoing transplantation in second or later remission or in relapse have a survival rate superior to those treated with chemotherapy; these data are summarized in Table 5. One important unresolved issue in ALL is whether children with high-risk ALL and adults should receive transplants in first remission. This answer will, to a considerable extent, depend on results achieved with chemotherapy alone. If intensive chemotherapy produces 50-70% disease-free survival in these individuals, it is unlikely that transplantation will be superior. If, however, alternative chemotherapy results are inferior, transplantation may be useful. Clearly, controlled clinical trials are needed. Results of transplants from donors other than HLA-identical siblings are less certain but this approach may be considered in selected young individuals who fail chemotherapy. Autotransplants should also be considered in this setting but not in individuals in first remission. It is likewise uncertain if in vitro treatment of the bone marrow is useful; this must be addressed in controlled trials. The data reviewed indicate an important role for bone marrow transplantation in the therapy of the acute leukaemias. We have attempted to precisely define its use in various disease states.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":75718,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in haematology","volume":"15 3","pages":"851-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bone marrow transplantation in acute leukaemia.\",\"authors\":\"R P Gale,&nbsp;R E Champlin\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bone marrow transplantation is useful in AML. Results of chemotherapy and transplantation are compared in Table 4. Transplantation is the preferred treatment in individuals who fail chemotherapy. Transplantation is also likely to be superior or comparable to chemotherapy in individuals less than 30 years of age in first remission. Transplantation in older individuals in first remission is controversial, but it is unlikely that these results are inferior to results with chemotherapy. Transplants from donors other than HLA-identical siblings are less well investigated but may be a reasonable alternative in young individuals in first relapse or second remission, particularly if recipient and donor share most HLA antigens. Autotransplants are difficult to evaluate critically and should be considered investigational in individuals in second or later remission for whom a suitable donor is unavailable. Autotransplants in first remission should be restricted to controlled clinical trials, since their efficacy is otherwise inevaluable. It is uncertain whether in vitro treatment of the bone marrow is necessary in the context of autotransplantation; again, controlled trials are required. Bone marrow transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling is a useful therapy in individuals with ALL who relapse despite chemotherapy. Individuals undergoing transplantation in second or later remission or in relapse have a survival rate superior to those treated with chemotherapy; these data are summarized in Table 5. One important unresolved issue in ALL is whether children with high-risk ALL and adults should receive transplants in first remission. This answer will, to a considerable extent, depend on results achieved with chemotherapy alone. If intensive chemotherapy produces 50-70% disease-free survival in these individuals, it is unlikely that transplantation will be superior. If, however, alternative chemotherapy results are inferior, transplantation may be useful. Clearly, controlled clinical trials are needed. Results of transplants from donors other than HLA-identical siblings are less certain but this approach may be considered in selected young individuals who fail chemotherapy. Autotransplants should also be considered in this setting but not in individuals in first remission. It is likewise uncertain if in vitro treatment of the bone marrow is useful; this must be addressed in controlled trials. The data reviewed indicate an important role for bone marrow transplantation in the therapy of the acute leukaemias. We have attempted to precisely define its use in various disease states.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics in haematology\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"851-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics in haematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in haematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

骨髓移植对急性髓性白血病是有用的。化疗与移植结果比较见表4。对于化疗失败的患者,移植是首选的治疗方法。对于30岁以下首次缓解的患者,移植也可能优于或与化疗相当。在首次缓解的老年人中进行移植是有争议的,但这些结果不太可能不如化疗的结果。来自非HLA相同兄弟姐妹的供体移植的研究较少,但对于首次复发或第二次缓解的年轻人来说可能是一个合理的选择,特别是如果受体和供体共享大多数HLA抗原。自体移植很难进行严格的评估,对于无法找到合适供体的第二次或更晚缓解的个体,应该考虑进行调查。首次缓解的自体移植应局限于对照临床试验,因为其疗效无法评估。目前尚不清楚在自体移植中是否需要体外治疗骨髓;同样,需要对照试验。来自hla相同同胞的骨髓移植对于化疗后复发的ALL患者是一种有用的治疗方法。在第二次或更晚缓解期或复发期接受移植的个体生存率优于化疗治疗的个体;这些数据汇总在表5中。在ALL中一个重要的未解决的问题是高风险ALL的儿童和成人是否应该在首次缓解时接受移植。这个答案在很大程度上取决于单独化疗的结果。如果强化化疗在这些个体中产生50-70%的无病生存率,移植不太可能是更好的选择。然而,如果替代化疗的效果较差,移植可能是有用的。显然,对照临床试验是必要的。从hla相同的兄弟姐妹以外的供体移植的结果不太确定,但这种方法可能被考虑在化疗失败的年轻人中。自体移植在这种情况下也可以考虑,但不适用于首次缓解的个体。同样不确定的是,骨髓体外治疗是否有用;这必须在对照试验中加以解决。文献回顾表明骨髓移植在急性白血病的治疗中具有重要作用。我们试图精确地定义它在各种疾病状态下的用途。(摘要删节为400字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bone marrow transplantation in acute leukaemia.

Bone marrow transplantation is useful in AML. Results of chemotherapy and transplantation are compared in Table 4. Transplantation is the preferred treatment in individuals who fail chemotherapy. Transplantation is also likely to be superior or comparable to chemotherapy in individuals less than 30 years of age in first remission. Transplantation in older individuals in first remission is controversial, but it is unlikely that these results are inferior to results with chemotherapy. Transplants from donors other than HLA-identical siblings are less well investigated but may be a reasonable alternative in young individuals in first relapse or second remission, particularly if recipient and donor share most HLA antigens. Autotransplants are difficult to evaluate critically and should be considered investigational in individuals in second or later remission for whom a suitable donor is unavailable. Autotransplants in first remission should be restricted to controlled clinical trials, since their efficacy is otherwise inevaluable. It is uncertain whether in vitro treatment of the bone marrow is necessary in the context of autotransplantation; again, controlled trials are required. Bone marrow transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling is a useful therapy in individuals with ALL who relapse despite chemotherapy. Individuals undergoing transplantation in second or later remission or in relapse have a survival rate superior to those treated with chemotherapy; these data are summarized in Table 5. One important unresolved issue in ALL is whether children with high-risk ALL and adults should receive transplants in first remission. This answer will, to a considerable extent, depend on results achieved with chemotherapy alone. If intensive chemotherapy produces 50-70% disease-free survival in these individuals, it is unlikely that transplantation will be superior. If, however, alternative chemotherapy results are inferior, transplantation may be useful. Clearly, controlled clinical trials are needed. Results of transplants from donors other than HLA-identical siblings are less certain but this approach may be considered in selected young individuals who fail chemotherapy. Autotransplants should also be considered in this setting but not in individuals in first remission. It is likewise uncertain if in vitro treatment of the bone marrow is useful; this must be addressed in controlled trials. The data reviewed indicate an important role for bone marrow transplantation in the therapy of the acute leukaemias. We have attempted to precisely define its use in various disease states.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Platelet disorders Cell Culture Techniques The role of colony stimulating factors in leukaemogenesis. Classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes. Chromosome abnormalities in the myelodysplastic syndromes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1