前一天的能量摄入对休息、手臂和腿部运动的能量消耗的影响。

Human nutrition. Clinical nutrition Pub Date : 1987-03-01
O Lammert, L Garby, K Maron, G Mørk, M Thein, P Flindt-Egebak, J Krogh-Hansen
{"title":"前一天的能量摄入对休息、手臂和腿部运动的能量消耗的影响。","authors":"O Lammert,&nbsp;L Garby,&nbsp;K Maron,&nbsp;G Mørk,&nbsp;M Thein,&nbsp;P Flindt-Egebak,&nbsp;J Krogh-Hansen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Relatively little is known about the response of the human body to perturbations in the energy intake. In particular, results of the effect of a perturbation of the preceding day's energy intake on the energy expenditure on the following day are conflicting, ranging from no effect at all to an increase in the resting metabolic rate of 12 per cent following an increase in the preceding day's energy intake of 5 MJ. In the present study, the fasting energy expenditure of rest, light arm work and light leg work was determined on days following an intake of 4, 10 and 16 MJ in seven healthy men. In each subject, the difference in energy expenditure between days following intakes on the preceding day of 10-10 (control), 10-4 and 10-16 MJ was calculated for each of the three tasks. The mean percentage differences between the days following an intake of 10-10, 10-4 and 10-16 MJ were (s.d. in parenthesis) 0.0 (4.0), +1.3 (4.0) and +0.6 (3.2) for the resting metabolic rate, -1.7 (4.0), -2.2 (3.2) and -1.7 (3.7) for arm work and +0.3 (2.0), -1.2 (2.9) and -0.3 (3.2) for leg work. When the differences for the three tasks were averaged, the results were -0.5 (1.4), -0.7 (2.4) and -0.5 (1.3) for the three combinations respectively. None of these differences were found to be statistically different from zero. Changes in plasma adrenaline and noradrenaline concentrations were also measured but found not to be related to the changes in energy expenditure or to the energy intakes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":13078,"journal":{"name":"Human nutrition. Clinical nutrition","volume":"41 2","pages":"141-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of the preceding day's energy intake on the energy costs of rest, arm and leg exercise.\",\"authors\":\"O Lammert,&nbsp;L Garby,&nbsp;K Maron,&nbsp;G Mørk,&nbsp;M Thein,&nbsp;P Flindt-Egebak,&nbsp;J Krogh-Hansen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Relatively little is known about the response of the human body to perturbations in the energy intake. In particular, results of the effect of a perturbation of the preceding day's energy intake on the energy expenditure on the following day are conflicting, ranging from no effect at all to an increase in the resting metabolic rate of 12 per cent following an increase in the preceding day's energy intake of 5 MJ. In the present study, the fasting energy expenditure of rest, light arm work and light leg work was determined on days following an intake of 4, 10 and 16 MJ in seven healthy men. In each subject, the difference in energy expenditure between days following intakes on the preceding day of 10-10 (control), 10-4 and 10-16 MJ was calculated for each of the three tasks. The mean percentage differences between the days following an intake of 10-10, 10-4 and 10-16 MJ were (s.d. in parenthesis) 0.0 (4.0), +1.3 (4.0) and +0.6 (3.2) for the resting metabolic rate, -1.7 (4.0), -2.2 (3.2) and -1.7 (3.7) for arm work and +0.3 (2.0), -1.2 (2.9) and -0.3 (3.2) for leg work. When the differences for the three tasks were averaged, the results were -0.5 (1.4), -0.7 (2.4) and -0.5 (1.3) for the three combinations respectively. None of these differences were found to be statistically different from zero. Changes in plasma adrenaline and noradrenaline concentrations were also measured but found not to be related to the changes in energy expenditure or to the energy intakes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human nutrition. Clinical nutrition\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"141-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human nutrition. Clinical nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human nutrition. Clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于人体对能量摄入扰动的反应,我们所知相对较少。特别是,前一天能量摄入的扰动对第二天能量消耗的影响的结果是相互矛盾的,从根本没有影响到在前一天能量摄入增加5兆焦耳后静息代谢率增加12%。在本研究中,研究人员测定了7名健康男性在摄入4、10和16 MJ后几天的休息、轻度手臂劳动和轻度腿部劳动的空腹能量消耗。在每个受试者中,计算10-10(对照)、10-4和10-16 MJ的前一天摄入后几天的能量消耗差异。摄入10-10、10-4和10-16 MJ后,静息代谢率的平均百分比差异为(括号内sd) 0.0(4.0)、+1.3(4.0)和+0.6(3.2),手臂工作的平均百分比差异为-1.7(4.0)、-2.2(3.2)和-1.7(3.7),腿部工作的平均百分比差异为+0.3(2.0)、-1.2(2.9)和-0.3(3.2)。当对三个任务的差异进行平均时,三种组合的结果分别为-0.5(1.4),-0.7(2.4)和-0.5(1.3)。这些差异在统计上都与零无关。血浆肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素浓度的变化也被测量,但发现与能量消耗或能量摄入的变化无关。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of the preceding day's energy intake on the energy costs of rest, arm and leg exercise.

Relatively little is known about the response of the human body to perturbations in the energy intake. In particular, results of the effect of a perturbation of the preceding day's energy intake on the energy expenditure on the following day are conflicting, ranging from no effect at all to an increase in the resting metabolic rate of 12 per cent following an increase in the preceding day's energy intake of 5 MJ. In the present study, the fasting energy expenditure of rest, light arm work and light leg work was determined on days following an intake of 4, 10 and 16 MJ in seven healthy men. In each subject, the difference in energy expenditure between days following intakes on the preceding day of 10-10 (control), 10-4 and 10-16 MJ was calculated for each of the three tasks. The mean percentage differences between the days following an intake of 10-10, 10-4 and 10-16 MJ were (s.d. in parenthesis) 0.0 (4.0), +1.3 (4.0) and +0.6 (3.2) for the resting metabolic rate, -1.7 (4.0), -2.2 (3.2) and -1.7 (3.7) for arm work and +0.3 (2.0), -1.2 (2.9) and -0.3 (3.2) for leg work. When the differences for the three tasks were averaged, the results were -0.5 (1.4), -0.7 (2.4) and -0.5 (1.3) for the three combinations respectively. None of these differences were found to be statistically different from zero. Changes in plasma adrenaline and noradrenaline concentrations were also measured but found not to be related to the changes in energy expenditure or to the energy intakes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of haemodialysis on taste for salt in relation to changes in blood constituents. Basal metabolic rate of Indian men: no evidence of metabolic adaptation to a low plane of nutrition. Acute modest changes in relative humidity do not affect energy expenditure at rest in human subjects. Procedures for calculating substrate and energy balances using indirect calorimetry. Measurement of protein turnover during pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1