常规临床实践中的功能评估:鸡笼图法的描述和初步发现

Eugene Nelson , John Wasson , John Kirk , Adam Keller , Donald Clark , Allen Dietrich , Anita Stewart , Michael Zubkoff
{"title":"常规临床实践中的功能评估:鸡笼图法的描述和初步发现","authors":"Eugene Nelson ,&nbsp;John Wasson ,&nbsp;John Kirk ,&nbsp;Adam Keller ,&nbsp;Donald Clark ,&nbsp;Allen Dietrich ,&nbsp;Anita Stewart ,&nbsp;Michael Zubkoff","doi":"10.1016/S0021-9681(87)80033-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The COOP Project, a primary care research network, has begun development of a Chart method to screen function quickly. The COOP Charts, analogous to Snellen Charts, were pretested in two practices on adult patients (<em>N</em> = 117) to test feasibility, clinical utility, and validity. Patients completed questionnaires containing validated health status scales and sociodemographic variables. Practice staff filled out forms indicating COOP Chart scores and clinical data. We held debriefing interviews with staff who administered the Charts, The results indicate the Charts take 1–2 minutes to administer, are easy to use, and produce important clinical data. The patterns of correlations between the Charts and validity indicator variables provide evidence for both convergent and discriminant validity. We conclude that new measures are needed to assess function in a busy office practice and that the COOP Chart system represents one promising strategy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15427,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chronic diseases","volume":"40 ","pages":"Pages 55S-63S"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0021-9681(87)80033-4","citationCount":"498","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: Description of the coop chart method and preliminary findings\",\"authors\":\"Eugene Nelson ,&nbsp;John Wasson ,&nbsp;John Kirk ,&nbsp;Adam Keller ,&nbsp;Donald Clark ,&nbsp;Allen Dietrich ,&nbsp;Anita Stewart ,&nbsp;Michael Zubkoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0021-9681(87)80033-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The COOP Project, a primary care research network, has begun development of a Chart method to screen function quickly. The COOP Charts, analogous to Snellen Charts, were pretested in two practices on adult patients (<em>N</em> = 117) to test feasibility, clinical utility, and validity. Patients completed questionnaires containing validated health status scales and sociodemographic variables. Practice staff filled out forms indicating COOP Chart scores and clinical data. We held debriefing interviews with staff who administered the Charts, The results indicate the Charts take 1–2 minutes to administer, are easy to use, and produce important clinical data. The patterns of correlations between the Charts and validity indicator variables provide evidence for both convergent and discriminant validity. We conclude that new measures are needed to assess function in a busy office practice and that the COOP Chart system represents one promising strategy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of chronic diseases\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 55S-63S\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0021-9681(87)80033-4\",\"citationCount\":\"498\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of chronic diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021968187800334\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chronic diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021968187800334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 498

摘要

COOP项目,一个初级保健研究网络,已经开始开发一种快速筛选功能的图表方法。COOP图与Snellen图类似,在两例成人患者(N = 117)中进行预测,以检验其可行性、临床实用性和有效性。患者完成包含有效的健康状况量表和社会人口变量的问卷调查。实习人员填写了有关COOP图表得分和临床数据的表格。我们与管理图表的工作人员进行了汇报访谈,结果表明图表的管理需要1-2分钟,易于使用,并产生重要的临床数据。图表与效度指标变量之间的相关性模式为收敛效度和判别效度提供了证据。我们的结论是,在繁忙的办公室实践中,需要新的措施来评估功能,而COOP图表系统代表了一个有希望的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: Description of the coop chart method and preliminary findings

The COOP Project, a primary care research network, has begun development of a Chart method to screen function quickly. The COOP Charts, analogous to Snellen Charts, were pretested in two practices on adult patients (N = 117) to test feasibility, clinical utility, and validity. Patients completed questionnaires containing validated health status scales and sociodemographic variables. Practice staff filled out forms indicating COOP Chart scores and clinical data. We held debriefing interviews with staff who administered the Charts, The results indicate the Charts take 1–2 minutes to administer, are easy to use, and produce important clinical data. The patterns of correlations between the Charts and validity indicator variables provide evidence for both convergent and discriminant validity. We conclude that new measures are needed to assess function in a busy office practice and that the COOP Chart system represents one promising strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the coordination of care. Polyuria. Which 5-ASA? Variation in colonic mucosal concentration of different pharmaceutical mesalamine formulations Author's reply Author's reply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1