两种大肠放射学制剂的随机研究。

Pharmatherapeutica Pub Date : 1987-01-01
B S Strates, L M Hofmann
{"title":"两种大肠放射学制剂的随机研究。","authors":"B S Strates,&nbsp;L M Hofmann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A randomized study was carried out in 195 out-patients, due to undergo large bowel radiological examination, to compare the efficacy, patient acceptance and incidence of side-effects of a commercially-available bowel evacuant kit (magnesium citrate oral solution, phenolphthalein tablets and a bisacodyl suppository) and castor oil with enemas. Overall evaluation by a radiologist of large bowel preparation, based on post-barium evacuation X-rays, was satisfactory in more than 98% of patients while bowel cleanliness, as determined by the ability to detect a 1 cm lesion, was adequate in 95% of patients using either preparation. Patient acceptance was in favour of the commercial preparation in that fewer patients using it found the procedure uncomfortable or indicated a preference for another evacuant than did those prepared with castor oil and enemas.</p>","PeriodicalId":19862,"journal":{"name":"Pharmatherapeutica","volume":"5 1","pages":"57-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomized study of two preparations for large bowel radiology.\",\"authors\":\"B S Strates,&nbsp;L M Hofmann\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A randomized study was carried out in 195 out-patients, due to undergo large bowel radiological examination, to compare the efficacy, patient acceptance and incidence of side-effects of a commercially-available bowel evacuant kit (magnesium citrate oral solution, phenolphthalein tablets and a bisacodyl suppository) and castor oil with enemas. Overall evaluation by a radiologist of large bowel preparation, based on post-barium evacuation X-rays, was satisfactory in more than 98% of patients while bowel cleanliness, as determined by the ability to detect a 1 cm lesion, was adequate in 95% of patients using either preparation. Patient acceptance was in favour of the commercial preparation in that fewer patients using it found the procedure uncomfortable or indicated a preference for another evacuant than did those prepared with castor oil and enemas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmatherapeutica\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"57-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmatherapeutica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmatherapeutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对195名因接受大肠放射学检查的门诊患者进行了一项随机研究,以比较市售肠排出剂套件(柠檬酸镁口服液、酚酞片和比沙卡因栓剂)和蓖麻油与灌肠剂的疗效、患者接受度和副作用发生率。放射科医生根据钡剂清除后x光片对大肠准备的总体评价,98%以上的患者满意,而95%的患者通过检测1厘米病变的能力来确定肠道清洁度。患者的接受度有利于商业制剂,因为较少的患者使用它发现程序不舒服或表示偏好另一种撤离剂,而不是用蓖麻油和灌肠剂制备的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A randomized study of two preparations for large bowel radiology.

A randomized study was carried out in 195 out-patients, due to undergo large bowel radiological examination, to compare the efficacy, patient acceptance and incidence of side-effects of a commercially-available bowel evacuant kit (magnesium citrate oral solution, phenolphthalein tablets and a bisacodyl suppository) and castor oil with enemas. Overall evaluation by a radiologist of large bowel preparation, based on post-barium evacuation X-rays, was satisfactory in more than 98% of patients while bowel cleanliness, as determined by the ability to detect a 1 cm lesion, was adequate in 95% of patients using either preparation. Patient acceptance was in favour of the commercial preparation in that fewer patients using it found the procedure uncomfortable or indicated a preference for another evacuant than did those prepared with castor oil and enemas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flupenthixol and fluvoxamine in mild to moderate depression: a comparison in general practice. Treatment of chronic occlusive arterial disease with pentoxifylline: changes in clinical and haemodynamic parameters. Effects of penbutolol on plasma atrial natriuretic peptide and antidiuretic hormone levels before and after exercise: a double-blind comparison against placebo. Absence of interaction between ramipril, a new ACE-inhibitor, and phenprocoumon, an anticoagulant agent. Zuclopenthixol and haloperidol/levomepromazine in the treatment of elderly patients with symptoms of aggressiveness and agitation: a double-blind, multi-centre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1