在完整动物体内,阻尼正弦和恒倾斜电流波形除颤效果的比较。

Medical instrumentation Pub Date : 1987-04-01
M Hinds, G M Ayers, J D Bourland, L A Geddes, W A Tacker, N Fearnot
{"title":"在完整动物体内,阻尼正弦和恒倾斜电流波形除颤效果的比较。","authors":"M Hinds,&nbsp;G M Ayers,&nbsp;J D Bourland,&nbsp;L A Geddes,&nbsp;W A Tacker,&nbsp;N Fearnot","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy of defibrillation using the damped sine and constant-tile (60%) truncated exponential waveforms was determined in each of nine dogs. Two measures of efficacy were used to compare the two waveforms: 1) threshold defibrillation current and 2) percent successful defibrillation. For both measures of efficacy, shock strength was expressed in terms of delivered energy. Mean threshold energy was 0.98 J/kg for the damped sine wave and it was 1.24 J/kg for the truncated exponential waveform. Percent successful defibrillation versus energy/kg curves were constructed for each of the waveforms and were found to be essentially the same. Percent successful defibrillation increased with increasing shock intensity. For 50% success, the energy for the damped sine wave was 1.16 J/kg; for the truncated exponential wave, the corresponding value was 1.15 J/kg. A shock of threshold intensity successfully defibrillated in approximately 50% of the defibrillation attempts, i.e., defibrillation threshold corresponds to about 50% successful defibrillation.</p>","PeriodicalId":76133,"journal":{"name":"Medical instrumentation","volume":"21 2","pages":"92-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the efficacy of defibrillation with the damped sine and constant-tilt current waveforms in the intact animal.\",\"authors\":\"M Hinds,&nbsp;G M Ayers,&nbsp;J D Bourland,&nbsp;L A Geddes,&nbsp;W A Tacker,&nbsp;N Fearnot\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The efficacy of defibrillation using the damped sine and constant-tile (60%) truncated exponential waveforms was determined in each of nine dogs. Two measures of efficacy were used to compare the two waveforms: 1) threshold defibrillation current and 2) percent successful defibrillation. For both measures of efficacy, shock strength was expressed in terms of delivered energy. Mean threshold energy was 0.98 J/kg for the damped sine wave and it was 1.24 J/kg for the truncated exponential waveform. Percent successful defibrillation versus energy/kg curves were constructed for each of the waveforms and were found to be essentially the same. Percent successful defibrillation increased with increasing shock intensity. For 50% success, the energy for the damped sine wave was 1.16 J/kg; for the truncated exponential wave, the corresponding value was 1.15 J/kg. A shock of threshold intensity successfully defibrillated in approximately 50% of the defibrillation attempts, i.e., defibrillation threshold corresponds to about 50% successful defibrillation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical instrumentation\",\"volume\":\"21 2\",\"pages\":\"92-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical instrumentation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical instrumentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在9只狗中分别使用阻尼正弦和恒定(60%)截断指数波形来确定除颤的效果。两种疗效指标被用来比较两种波形:1)阈值除颤电流和2)成功除颤的百分比。对于两种有效性的测量,冲击强度都是用传递的能量来表示的。阻尼正弦波的平均阈值能量为0.98 J/kg,截断指数波形的平均阈值能量为1.24 J/kg。为每种波形构建了除颤成功率与能量/kg的曲线,发现基本相同。除颤成功率随电击强度的增加而增加。50%成功时,阻尼正弦波能量为1.16 J/kg;截断后的指数波对应值为1.15 J/kg。阈值强度的电击在约50%的除颤尝试中成功除颤,即除颤阈值对应于约50%的成功除颤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the efficacy of defibrillation with the damped sine and constant-tilt current waveforms in the intact animal.

The efficacy of defibrillation using the damped sine and constant-tile (60%) truncated exponential waveforms was determined in each of nine dogs. Two measures of efficacy were used to compare the two waveforms: 1) threshold defibrillation current and 2) percent successful defibrillation. For both measures of efficacy, shock strength was expressed in terms of delivered energy. Mean threshold energy was 0.98 J/kg for the damped sine wave and it was 1.24 J/kg for the truncated exponential waveform. Percent successful defibrillation versus energy/kg curves were constructed for each of the waveforms and were found to be essentially the same. Percent successful defibrillation increased with increasing shock intensity. For 50% success, the energy for the damped sine wave was 1.16 J/kg; for the truncated exponential wave, the corresponding value was 1.15 J/kg. A shock of threshold intensity successfully defibrillated in approximately 50% of the defibrillation attempts, i.e., defibrillation threshold corresponds to about 50% successful defibrillation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Physical fitness in the elderly. Anesthesia delivery systems. Effects of using potassium adsorption filters on saline-filled and saline-removed methods for the removal of potassium from red blood cell solutions Plasma viscosity and whole blood viscosity as diagnostic tools of blood abnormalities by using simple syringe method A technique for measuring spatial distribution of electromagnetic fields created by radio-frequency coils in MRI scanners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1