心室除颤阈值:其应用和解释的固有局限性。

Medical instrumentation Pub Date : 1987-06-01
W C McDaniel, J C Schuder
{"title":"心室除颤阈值:其应用和解释的固有局限性。","authors":"W C McDaniel,&nbsp;J C Schuder","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A quantity termed the \"threshold\" has been used to describe the results of electrical ventricular defibrillation studies, with the implication of a clear distinction between ineffective and effective shock intensities. Although several definitions of the threshold have been suggested, and various methods have been used to quantify it, no comparison of the accuracies of the various methods could be found in the literature. This article, after presenting a method of applying basic probability theory to an assumed distribution relating probability of successful defibrillation to current amplitude, uses the method to examine several popular algorithms for defibrillation-threshold determination. The results show that where a sharp transition exists from ineffective to effective current amplitudes, most algorithms yield fairly good results. Where that transition is gradual (as it appears to be in all of the published reports examined), the algorithms are shown to be inadequate.</p>","PeriodicalId":76133,"journal":{"name":"Medical instrumentation","volume":"21 3","pages":"170-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The cardiac ventricular defibrillation threshold: inherent limitations in its application and interpretation.\",\"authors\":\"W C McDaniel,&nbsp;J C Schuder\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A quantity termed the \\\"threshold\\\" has been used to describe the results of electrical ventricular defibrillation studies, with the implication of a clear distinction between ineffective and effective shock intensities. Although several definitions of the threshold have been suggested, and various methods have been used to quantify it, no comparison of the accuracies of the various methods could be found in the literature. This article, after presenting a method of applying basic probability theory to an assumed distribution relating probability of successful defibrillation to current amplitude, uses the method to examine several popular algorithms for defibrillation-threshold determination. The results show that where a sharp transition exists from ineffective to effective current amplitudes, most algorithms yield fairly good results. Where that transition is gradual (as it appears to be in all of the published reports examined), the algorithms are shown to be inadequate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical instrumentation\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"170-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical instrumentation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical instrumentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个被称为“阈值”的量被用来描述心室电除颤研究的结果,这意味着有效和无效的电击强度之间有明确的区别。虽然已经提出了阈值的几种定义,并且已经使用了各种方法来量化它,但在文献中没有发现各种方法的准确性的比较。本文提出了一种将基本概率论应用于除颤成功概率与电流幅值的假设分布的方法,并使用该方法检查了几种常用的除颤阈值确定算法。结果表明,在从无效电流幅值到有效电流幅值存在急剧转变的情况下,大多数算法都能产生相当好的结果。如果这种转变是渐进的(就像所有已发表的报告所审查的那样),那么算法就会显示出不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The cardiac ventricular defibrillation threshold: inherent limitations in its application and interpretation.

A quantity termed the "threshold" has been used to describe the results of electrical ventricular defibrillation studies, with the implication of a clear distinction between ineffective and effective shock intensities. Although several definitions of the threshold have been suggested, and various methods have been used to quantify it, no comparison of the accuracies of the various methods could be found in the literature. This article, after presenting a method of applying basic probability theory to an assumed distribution relating probability of successful defibrillation to current amplitude, uses the method to examine several popular algorithms for defibrillation-threshold determination. The results show that where a sharp transition exists from ineffective to effective current amplitudes, most algorithms yield fairly good results. Where that transition is gradual (as it appears to be in all of the published reports examined), the algorithms are shown to be inadequate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Physical fitness in the elderly. Anesthesia delivery systems. Effects of using potassium adsorption filters on saline-filled and saline-removed methods for the removal of potassium from red blood cell solutions Plasma viscosity and whole blood viscosity as diagnostic tools of blood abnormalities by using simple syringe method A technique for measuring spatial distribution of electromagnetic fields created by radio-frequency coils in MRI scanners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1