猝死综合征婴儿正常和未遂睡眠时的鼻腔阻塞。

D O Rodenstein, A Kahn, D Blum, D C Stănescu
{"title":"猝死综合征婴儿正常和未遂睡眠时的鼻腔阻塞。","authors":"D O Rodenstein,&nbsp;A Kahn,&nbsp;D Blum,&nbsp;D C Stănescu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obligatory nasal breathing has been suggested in the past as a contributor to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS): nasal obstruction would result in death as infants were unable to breathe orally. To test this hypothesis, we studied 55 normal and 14 near-miss for SIDS infants during a whole-night polysomnography. On several occasions, the infant nares were gently occluded by the fingertips of the investigator. Infants continued to make respiratory efforts against the occluded nose for a variable time (apnoea time), then opened the mouth and started to breathe through it. Mean apnoea time in normal infants was 4.76 +/- 3.41 s (means +/- SD), and 6.54 +/- 4.25 s in near-miss for SIDS ones. These figures were not significantly different. Analysis according to sleep stage (quiet sleep: 4.08 +/- 3.24 s in normals and 6.50 +/- 4.18 s in near-miss for SIDS ones; active sleep: 6.54 +/- 3.67 s in normals and 6.58 +/- 4.76 s in near-miss for SIDS ones) did not disclose any significant difference between groups. There was no significant relationship between apnoea time and age in either group. In many cases, an arousal preceded the resumption of (oral) flow. However, in almost half of the occlusions, oral breathing was initiated during continuing sleep. We conclude: 1) infants are not obligatory nasal breathers, and 2) the nasal obstruction hypothesis should be discarded in the etiology of SIDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":75642,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin europeen de physiopathologie respiratoire","volume":"23 3","pages":"223-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nasal occlusion during sleep in normal and near-miss for sudden death syndrome infants.\",\"authors\":\"D O Rodenstein,&nbsp;A Kahn,&nbsp;D Blum,&nbsp;D C Stănescu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Obligatory nasal breathing has been suggested in the past as a contributor to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS): nasal obstruction would result in death as infants were unable to breathe orally. To test this hypothesis, we studied 55 normal and 14 near-miss for SIDS infants during a whole-night polysomnography. On several occasions, the infant nares were gently occluded by the fingertips of the investigator. Infants continued to make respiratory efforts against the occluded nose for a variable time (apnoea time), then opened the mouth and started to breathe through it. Mean apnoea time in normal infants was 4.76 +/- 3.41 s (means +/- SD), and 6.54 +/- 4.25 s in near-miss for SIDS ones. These figures were not significantly different. Analysis according to sleep stage (quiet sleep: 4.08 +/- 3.24 s in normals and 6.50 +/- 4.18 s in near-miss for SIDS ones; active sleep: 6.54 +/- 3.67 s in normals and 6.58 +/- 4.76 s in near-miss for SIDS ones) did not disclose any significant difference between groups. There was no significant relationship between apnoea time and age in either group. In many cases, an arousal preceded the resumption of (oral) flow. However, in almost half of the occlusions, oral breathing was initiated during continuing sleep. We conclude: 1) infants are not obligatory nasal breathers, and 2) the nasal obstruction hypothesis should be discarded in the etiology of SIDS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin europeen de physiopathologie respiratoire\",\"volume\":\"23 3\",\"pages\":\"223-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin europeen de physiopathologie respiratoire\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin europeen de physiopathologie respiratoire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

强制性的鼻腔呼吸在过去被认为是婴儿猝死综合症(SIDS)的一个因素:由于婴儿无法进行口腔呼吸,鼻塞会导致死亡。为了验证这一假设,我们研究了55名正常婴儿和14名在整晚多导睡眠图中差点漏诊的SIDS婴儿。在一些情况下,婴儿的鼻子被研究者的指尖轻轻闭塞。婴儿在一段可变的时间内(呼吸暂停时间)继续对着堵塞的鼻子进行呼吸,然后张开嘴,开始通过它呼吸。正常患儿平均呼吸暂停时间为4.76 +/- 3.41 s(平均值+/- SD), SIDS患儿平均呼吸暂停时间为6.54 +/- 4.25 s。这些数据没有显著差异。按睡眠阶段分析(安静睡眠:正常人4.08 +/- 3.24 s,小岛屿发展中国家患儿近睡时间6.50 +/- 4.18 s;活跃睡眠:正常人为6.54 +/- 3.67 s,小岛屿发展中国家患儿为6.58 +/- 4.76 s),组间无显著差异。两组患者呼吸暂停时间与年龄无显著关系。在许多情况下,唤醒先于(口)流恢复。然而,在几乎一半的咬合中,口腔呼吸是在持续睡眠中开始的。我们的结论是:1)婴儿不是强制性的鼻腔呼吸者,2)在SIDS的病因学中应放弃鼻塞假说。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nasal occlusion during sleep in normal and near-miss for sudden death syndrome infants.

Obligatory nasal breathing has been suggested in the past as a contributor to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS): nasal obstruction would result in death as infants were unable to breathe orally. To test this hypothesis, we studied 55 normal and 14 near-miss for SIDS infants during a whole-night polysomnography. On several occasions, the infant nares were gently occluded by the fingertips of the investigator. Infants continued to make respiratory efforts against the occluded nose for a variable time (apnoea time), then opened the mouth and started to breathe through it. Mean apnoea time in normal infants was 4.76 +/- 3.41 s (means +/- SD), and 6.54 +/- 4.25 s in near-miss for SIDS ones. These figures were not significantly different. Analysis according to sleep stage (quiet sleep: 4.08 +/- 3.24 s in normals and 6.50 +/- 4.18 s in near-miss for SIDS ones; active sleep: 6.54 +/- 3.67 s in normals and 6.58 +/- 4.76 s in near-miss for SIDS ones) did not disclose any significant difference between groups. There was no significant relationship between apnoea time and age in either group. In many cases, an arousal preceded the resumption of (oral) flow. However, in almost half of the occlusions, oral breathing was initiated during continuing sleep. We conclude: 1) infants are not obligatory nasal breathers, and 2) the nasal obstruction hypothesis should be discarded in the etiology of SIDS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Status Asthmaticus The development of an animal model for TDI asthma. The role of neuropeptides as neurotransmitters of non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic nerves in bronchial asthma. Epidemiological measurement of bronchial responsiveness in polyurethane workers. Late asthmatic reactions and changes in histamine responsiveness provoked by occupational agents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1