{"title":"外源性o6 -甲基鸟嘌呤抑制加合物的去除,使人类细胞对化学致癌物质n -甲基-n '-硝基-n -亚硝基鸟嘌呤的杀伤敏感","authors":"Michael A. Babich , Rufus S. Day III","doi":"10.1016/0167-8817(87)90023-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We partially depleted the <em>O</em><sup>6</sup>-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase activity in four <em>O</em><sup>6</sup>-methylguanine (O<sup>6</sup>-mGua) repair-proficient (Mer +) human cell strains with exogenous O<sup>6</sup>-mGua (2 mM for 3 h, a non-toxic regimen) and then challenged them with <em>N</em>-methyl-<em>N</em>'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG). MT-partially depleted HT29 cells removed O<sup>6</sup>-mGua from DNA at about half the rate of control cells, while removal of 3-methyladeninwas unaffected. In spite of partial depletion, of MT, however, cell killing by MNNG in a colony-forming assay with HT29, A549, A498 or KD cells was not greatly affected. (This is in contrast to the dramatic potentiation of CNU cytotoxicity observed previously.) In an attempt to sensitize Mer + strains to killing by MNNG, we treated cells with O<sup>6</sup>-mGua following MNNG exposure (0.4 mM for 4 days), in addition to the pre-MNNG treatment of 2 mM O<sup>6</sup>-mGua for 3 h. This sensitized KD and HT29 cells 2-fold to killing by MNNG, based on the dose at 10% survival, but did not sensitive Mer - A1336. However, post-treatment alone was as effective as combined pre- and post-treatment in sensitizing KD cells to killing. Thus, when the O<sup>6</sup>-mGua post-tretment was begun, > 50% of O<sup>6</sup>-mGua was already removed from cell DNA. Our finding may be accounted for by at least two schemes, one in which nonlethal O<sup>6</sup>-mGua are removed from DNA rapidly, while potentially lethal O<sup>6</sup>-mGua are repaired later. The other scheme proposes that exogenous O<sup>6</sup>-mGua increases the lethality of a non-O<sup>6</sup>-mGua lesion by reducing its repair both in Mer + and Mer − cells. Both schemes are consistent with the hypothesis that O<sup>6</sup>-mGua may be a lethal DNA lesion in human cells.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100936,"journal":{"name":"Mutation Research/DNA Repair Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0167-8817(87)90023-X","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exogenous O6-methylguanine inhibits adduct removal and sensitizes human cells to killing by the chemical carcinogen N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine\",\"authors\":\"Michael A. Babich , Rufus S. Day III\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0167-8817(87)90023-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We partially depleted the <em>O</em><sup>6</sup>-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase activity in four <em>O</em><sup>6</sup>-methylguanine (O<sup>6</sup>-mGua) repair-proficient (Mer +) human cell strains with exogenous O<sup>6</sup>-mGua (2 mM for 3 h, a non-toxic regimen) and then challenged them with <em>N</em>-methyl-<em>N</em>'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG). MT-partially depleted HT29 cells removed O<sup>6</sup>-mGua from DNA at about half the rate of control cells, while removal of 3-methyladeninwas unaffected. In spite of partial depletion, of MT, however, cell killing by MNNG in a colony-forming assay with HT29, A549, A498 or KD cells was not greatly affected. (This is in contrast to the dramatic potentiation of CNU cytotoxicity observed previously.) In an attempt to sensitize Mer + strains to killing by MNNG, we treated cells with O<sup>6</sup>-mGua following MNNG exposure (0.4 mM for 4 days), in addition to the pre-MNNG treatment of 2 mM O<sup>6</sup>-mGua for 3 h. This sensitized KD and HT29 cells 2-fold to killing by MNNG, based on the dose at 10% survival, but did not sensitive Mer - A1336. However, post-treatment alone was as effective as combined pre- and post-treatment in sensitizing KD cells to killing. Thus, when the O<sup>6</sup>-mGua post-tretment was begun, > 50% of O<sup>6</sup>-mGua was already removed from cell DNA. Our finding may be accounted for by at least two schemes, one in which nonlethal O<sup>6</sup>-mGua are removed from DNA rapidly, while potentially lethal O<sup>6</sup>-mGua are repaired later. The other scheme proposes that exogenous O<sup>6</sup>-mGua increases the lethality of a non-O<sup>6</sup>-mGua lesion by reducing its repair both in Mer + and Mer − cells. Both schemes are consistent with the hypothesis that O<sup>6</sup>-mGua may be a lethal DNA lesion in human cells.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mutation Research/DNA Repair Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0167-8817(87)90023-X\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mutation Research/DNA Repair Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016788178790023X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutation Research/DNA Repair Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016788178790023X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exogenous O6-methylguanine inhibits adduct removal and sensitizes human cells to killing by the chemical carcinogen N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
We partially depleted the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase activity in four O6-methylguanine (O6-mGua) repair-proficient (Mer +) human cell strains with exogenous O6-mGua (2 mM for 3 h, a non-toxic regimen) and then challenged them with N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG). MT-partially depleted HT29 cells removed O6-mGua from DNA at about half the rate of control cells, while removal of 3-methyladeninwas unaffected. In spite of partial depletion, of MT, however, cell killing by MNNG in a colony-forming assay with HT29, A549, A498 or KD cells was not greatly affected. (This is in contrast to the dramatic potentiation of CNU cytotoxicity observed previously.) In an attempt to sensitize Mer + strains to killing by MNNG, we treated cells with O6-mGua following MNNG exposure (0.4 mM for 4 days), in addition to the pre-MNNG treatment of 2 mM O6-mGua for 3 h. This sensitized KD and HT29 cells 2-fold to killing by MNNG, based on the dose at 10% survival, but did not sensitive Mer - A1336. However, post-treatment alone was as effective as combined pre- and post-treatment in sensitizing KD cells to killing. Thus, when the O6-mGua post-tretment was begun, > 50% of O6-mGua was already removed from cell DNA. Our finding may be accounted for by at least two schemes, one in which nonlethal O6-mGua are removed from DNA rapidly, while potentially lethal O6-mGua are repaired later. The other scheme proposes that exogenous O6-mGua increases the lethality of a non-O6-mGua lesion by reducing its repair both in Mer + and Mer − cells. Both schemes are consistent with the hypothesis that O6-mGua may be a lethal DNA lesion in human cells.