视觉显示肌电反馈:上肢偏瘫康复个案研究。

J G Gianutsos, A Eberstein, G Krasilovsky, K T Ragnarsson, J Goodgold
{"title":"视觉显示肌电反馈:上肢偏瘫康复个案研究。","authors":"J G Gianutsos,&nbsp;A Eberstein,&nbsp;G Krasilovsky,&nbsp;K T Ragnarsson,&nbsp;J Goodgold","doi":"10.1089/cns.1986.3.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy of visually displayed EMG feedback in treating hemiplegic upper limb motor disorders was investigated in 5 patients (0.5-4 years poststroke). A single case experimental method \"multiple-baseline across target behaviors\" was used to compare performance during the feedback phase to that occurring in the monitored baseline phase. The nonfeedback baseline phase was followed by the staggered introduction of audiovisual feedback for each of the targeted pairs of muscles. EMG feedback obtained from muscle pairs (shoulder: anterior deltoid and upper trapezius; elbow: brachial triceps and biceps; digits: extensor digitorum communis and digit flexors) was displayed as two distinct waveforms on a videomonitor during therapy. Nonfeedback assessment of each of the three pairs was performed during each session. The effects of feedback were not uniformly distributed. Elbow control responded best, and statistical tests confirmed the effects of intervention observed clinically in all 5 patients. Clinical improvements in shoulder flexion were observed in 4 patients but could be statistically attributed to EMG gains in just 1. Improvement in finger extension observed clinically in 3 patients was statistically attributable to EMG gains in 2. All patients regained control of at least one target activity. EMG gains were accompanied by increases in active range of motion and by varying functional improvement. Marked functional gains in 3 patients were obtained with recovery of finger control.</p>","PeriodicalId":77690,"journal":{"name":"Central nervous system trauma : journal of the American Paralysis Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/cns.1986.3.63","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visually displayed EMG feedback: single case studies of hemiplegic upper extremity rehabilitation.\",\"authors\":\"J G Gianutsos,&nbsp;A Eberstein,&nbsp;G Krasilovsky,&nbsp;K T Ragnarsson,&nbsp;J Goodgold\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/cns.1986.3.63\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The efficacy of visually displayed EMG feedback in treating hemiplegic upper limb motor disorders was investigated in 5 patients (0.5-4 years poststroke). A single case experimental method \\\"multiple-baseline across target behaviors\\\" was used to compare performance during the feedback phase to that occurring in the monitored baseline phase. The nonfeedback baseline phase was followed by the staggered introduction of audiovisual feedback for each of the targeted pairs of muscles. EMG feedback obtained from muscle pairs (shoulder: anterior deltoid and upper trapezius; elbow: brachial triceps and biceps; digits: extensor digitorum communis and digit flexors) was displayed as two distinct waveforms on a videomonitor during therapy. Nonfeedback assessment of each of the three pairs was performed during each session. The effects of feedback were not uniformly distributed. Elbow control responded best, and statistical tests confirmed the effects of intervention observed clinically in all 5 patients. Clinical improvements in shoulder flexion were observed in 4 patients but could be statistically attributed to EMG gains in just 1. Improvement in finger extension observed clinically in 3 patients was statistically attributable to EMG gains in 2. All patients regained control of at least one target activity. EMG gains were accompanied by increases in active range of motion and by varying functional improvement. Marked functional gains in 3 patients were obtained with recovery of finger control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central nervous system trauma : journal of the American Paralysis Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/cns.1986.3.63\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central nervous system trauma : journal of the American Paralysis Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/cns.1986.3.63\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central nervous system trauma : journal of the American Paralysis Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cns.1986.3.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

观察5例脑卒中后0.5 ~ 4年视肌电反馈治疗偏瘫上肢运动障碍的疗效。采用“跨目标行为多基线”的单例实验方法对反馈阶段和监测基线阶段的表现进行比较。在非反馈基线阶段之后,对每对目标肌肉进行错开的视听反馈。肌对肌电反馈(肩部:前三角肌和上斜方肌;肘部:肱三头肌和肱二头肌;在治疗期间,手指(指共伸肌和指屈肌)在视频监视器上显示为两种不同的波形。在每次会议期间对三对中的每对进行非反馈评估。反馈的效果不是均匀分布的。肘部控制效果最好,统计学检验证实了5例患者临床观察到的干预效果。在4例患者中观察到肩部屈曲的临床改善,但统计学上可归因于仅有1例患者的肌电图增加。临床观察到3例患者手指伸度改善,其中2例患者肌电图增加。所有患者至少恢复了一项目标活动的控制。肌电图的增加伴随着活动范围的增加和不同程度的功能改善。3例患者手指功能明显恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Visually displayed EMG feedback: single case studies of hemiplegic upper extremity rehabilitation.

The efficacy of visually displayed EMG feedback in treating hemiplegic upper limb motor disorders was investigated in 5 patients (0.5-4 years poststroke). A single case experimental method "multiple-baseline across target behaviors" was used to compare performance during the feedback phase to that occurring in the monitored baseline phase. The nonfeedback baseline phase was followed by the staggered introduction of audiovisual feedback for each of the targeted pairs of muscles. EMG feedback obtained from muscle pairs (shoulder: anterior deltoid and upper trapezius; elbow: brachial triceps and biceps; digits: extensor digitorum communis and digit flexors) was displayed as two distinct waveforms on a videomonitor during therapy. Nonfeedback assessment of each of the three pairs was performed during each session. The effects of feedback were not uniformly distributed. Elbow control responded best, and statistical tests confirmed the effects of intervention observed clinically in all 5 patients. Clinical improvements in shoulder flexion were observed in 4 patients but could be statistically attributed to EMG gains in just 1. Improvement in finger extension observed clinically in 3 patients was statistically attributable to EMG gains in 2. All patients regained control of at least one target activity. EMG gains were accompanied by increases in active range of motion and by varying functional improvement. Marked functional gains in 3 patients were obtained with recovery of finger control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Treatment of experimental spinal trauma with thyrotropin-releasing hormone: central serotonergic and vascular mechanisms of action. Opiate-receptor antagonists, thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH), and TRH analogs in the treatment of spinal cord injury. The post-injury responses in trauma and ischemia: secondary injury or protective mechanisms? Total phosphate determination in brain tissues: a method for regional determination of total phosphate in rat brain. Evaluation and diagnosis of cervical spine injuries: a review of the literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1