{"title":"1977 - 1984年三级医院输血实践模式的变化。","authors":"J Freedman, C Lim, J Wright","doi":"10.1007/BF03010971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patterns of blood transfusion practice over an eight-year-period (1977-1984) are described. Use of blood and blood products increased annually as did the number of patients crossmatched and transfused. Programs such as the \"Blood Group & Antibody Screen\" and the \"Maximum Surgical Blood Order Schedule\" were important in improving transfusion practices. There was improvement in blood use by all subspecialties; the overall C:T (crossmatched:transfused blood) ratio declined from 4.4 to 2.8. Approximately a quarter of both crossmatches performed and transfusions of red cells were associated with cardiac surgery. Incidence of outdated units of blood declined markedly (2.6 per cent in 1984), as did requests for and administration of single unit transfusions. Seven per cent of patients received one unit of blood during hospitalization; since 85 per cent of these were associated with surgery (57 per cent cardiac surgery), it is suggested that single unit transfusions may sometimes be more appropriate than inappropriate. Two per cent of patients had clinically significant alloantibodies. About two per cent of patients had positive direct antiglobulin tests; nine per cent of the sera of these patients contained both auto and alloantibodies. Such data are important for transfusion quality assurance as well as for optimal logistical use of facilities both at hospital Blood Bank and blood collection agency levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":9371,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal","volume":"33 4","pages":"458-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03010971","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changing patterns of transfusion practice in a tertiary care hospital from 1977 to 1984.\",\"authors\":\"J Freedman, C Lim, J Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF03010971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patterns of blood transfusion practice over an eight-year-period (1977-1984) are described. Use of blood and blood products increased annually as did the number of patients crossmatched and transfused. Programs such as the \\\"Blood Group & Antibody Screen\\\" and the \\\"Maximum Surgical Blood Order Schedule\\\" were important in improving transfusion practices. There was improvement in blood use by all subspecialties; the overall C:T (crossmatched:transfused blood) ratio declined from 4.4 to 2.8. Approximately a quarter of both crossmatches performed and transfusions of red cells were associated with cardiac surgery. Incidence of outdated units of blood declined markedly (2.6 per cent in 1984), as did requests for and administration of single unit transfusions. Seven per cent of patients received one unit of blood during hospitalization; since 85 per cent of these were associated with surgery (57 per cent cardiac surgery), it is suggested that single unit transfusions may sometimes be more appropriate than inappropriate. Two per cent of patients had clinically significant alloantibodies. About two per cent of patients had positive direct antiglobulin tests; nine per cent of the sera of these patients contained both auto and alloantibodies. Such data are important for transfusion quality assurance as well as for optimal logistical use of facilities both at hospital Blood Bank and blood collection agency levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal\",\"volume\":\"33 4\",\"pages\":\"458-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03010971\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03010971\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03010971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Changing patterns of transfusion practice in a tertiary care hospital from 1977 to 1984.
Patterns of blood transfusion practice over an eight-year-period (1977-1984) are described. Use of blood and blood products increased annually as did the number of patients crossmatched and transfused. Programs such as the "Blood Group & Antibody Screen" and the "Maximum Surgical Blood Order Schedule" were important in improving transfusion practices. There was improvement in blood use by all subspecialties; the overall C:T (crossmatched:transfused blood) ratio declined from 4.4 to 2.8. Approximately a quarter of both crossmatches performed and transfusions of red cells were associated with cardiac surgery. Incidence of outdated units of blood declined markedly (2.6 per cent in 1984), as did requests for and administration of single unit transfusions. Seven per cent of patients received one unit of blood during hospitalization; since 85 per cent of these were associated with surgery (57 per cent cardiac surgery), it is suggested that single unit transfusions may sometimes be more appropriate than inappropriate. Two per cent of patients had clinically significant alloantibodies. About two per cent of patients had positive direct antiglobulin tests; nine per cent of the sera of these patients contained both auto and alloantibodies. Such data are important for transfusion quality assurance as well as for optimal logistical use of facilities both at hospital Blood Bank and blood collection agency levels.