{"title":"道德思考与政府政策:人类胚胎学沃诺克委员会。","authors":"M Warnock","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A parliamentary committee of inquiry was convened in response to growing concern--among the general public and the scientific community--about new techniques in human fertilization and research in embryology. The committee had to enter that jurisprudential minefield, the theoretical relation between morality and the law. When issues arise in which there is no historical tradition, the voice of morality may be genuinely confused and uncertain. But the law, unlike moral opinion, cannot be contradictory; it must be definite, unambiguous, and universally applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":76697,"journal":{"name":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society","volume":"63 3","pages":"504-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral thinking and government policy: the Warnock Committee on Human Embryology.\",\"authors\":\"M Warnock\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A parliamentary committee of inquiry was convened in response to growing concern--among the general public and the scientific community--about new techniques in human fertilization and research in embryology. The committee had to enter that jurisprudential minefield, the theoretical relation between morality and the law. When issues arise in which there is no historical tradition, the voice of morality may be genuinely confused and uncertain. But the law, unlike moral opinion, cannot be contradictory; it must be definite, unambiguous, and universally applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society\",\"volume\":\"63 3\",\"pages\":\"504-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Moral thinking and government policy: the Warnock Committee on Human Embryology.
A parliamentary committee of inquiry was convened in response to growing concern--among the general public and the scientific community--about new techniques in human fertilization and research in embryology. The committee had to enter that jurisprudential minefield, the theoretical relation between morality and the law. When issues arise in which there is no historical tradition, the voice of morality may be genuinely confused and uncertain. But the law, unlike moral opinion, cannot be contradictory; it must be definite, unambiguous, and universally applicable.