{"title":"人类有毛和无毛皮肤对气肿的不同敏感性。","authors":"H A Hamalainen, S Warren, E P Gardner","doi":"10.3109/07367228509144569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To compare the relative sensitivities of glabrous and hairy skin, we measured reaction times (RTs) and detectability (d') of airpuffs delivered to the hairy dorsum and glabrous thenar eminence of the hand of six human subjects. In contrast to previous studies with mechanical contact stimuli, airpuffs applied to hairy skin were detected with equal or greater fidelity than airpuffs tested on glabrous skin. Mean RTs to three simultaneously applied airpuffs were significantly shorter (p less than .005) on hairy skin in five of six subjects, and in 74% of paired sessions; no significant difference in mean RTs was observed in 16% of the sessions. The superiority of hairy skin was less evident, however, when single airpuffs were tested, as significantly shorter responses were observed on only 45% of the paired sessions, and nearly identical responses on 38% of the sessions. Detectability of airpuffs (d'), which is independent of the value of RTs, was identical on hairy and glabrous skin at high airpuff intensities (1,600 dyn), and superior (n = 4) or equal (n = 2) on hairy skin with low airpuff intensities (800 dyn). Spatial summation was more pronounced on hairy than on glabrous skin. Three simultaneously presented airpuffs produced significantly shorter RTs than one airpuff in 85% of the paired sessions on hairy skin, but on only half of the sessions on glabrous skin. The spatial distribution of stimulus force was less important on hairy skin, as three low-intensity airpuffs produced the same or shorter RTs than one high-intensity airpuff. By contrast, on glabrous skin, detectability was significantly better when force was concentrated at a single point (1 X 1,600 dyn) than when diffused over a wide skin area (3 X 800 dyn). The enhanced sensitivity of hairy skin to airpuffs appears partially attributable to hair motion in the airstream. After hair removal by chemical depilation, detectability of airpuffs was reduced on hairy skin to a level equal to or below that on glabrous skin. Spatial summation on the depilated skin corresponded to that observed on the intact hairy skin, indicating that depilation did not abolish intensity discrimination, but rather lowered the overall sensitivity of hairy skin. These results show that hair follicle units form a very sensitive detection mechanism on hairy skin of the human hand, similar to that provided by Meissner's and Pacinian afferents in glabrous skin. These findings with airpuffs provide the first example of a tactile stimulus that is less effective for mechanoreceptors in glabrous skin than in hairy skin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77800,"journal":{"name":"Somatosensory research","volume":"2 4","pages":"281-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/07367228509144569","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential sensitivity to airpuffs on human hairy and glabrous skin.\",\"authors\":\"H A Hamalainen, S Warren, E P Gardner\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/07367228509144569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To compare the relative sensitivities of glabrous and hairy skin, we measured reaction times (RTs) and detectability (d') of airpuffs delivered to the hairy dorsum and glabrous thenar eminence of the hand of six human subjects. In contrast to previous studies with mechanical contact stimuli, airpuffs applied to hairy skin were detected with equal or greater fidelity than airpuffs tested on glabrous skin. Mean RTs to three simultaneously applied airpuffs were significantly shorter (p less than .005) on hairy skin in five of six subjects, and in 74% of paired sessions; no significant difference in mean RTs was observed in 16% of the sessions. The superiority of hairy skin was less evident, however, when single airpuffs were tested, as significantly shorter responses were observed on only 45% of the paired sessions, and nearly identical responses on 38% of the sessions. Detectability of airpuffs (d'), which is independent of the value of RTs, was identical on hairy and glabrous skin at high airpuff intensities (1,600 dyn), and superior (n = 4) or equal (n = 2) on hairy skin with low airpuff intensities (800 dyn). Spatial summation was more pronounced on hairy than on glabrous skin. Three simultaneously presented airpuffs produced significantly shorter RTs than one airpuff in 85% of the paired sessions on hairy skin, but on only half of the sessions on glabrous skin. The spatial distribution of stimulus force was less important on hairy skin, as three low-intensity airpuffs produced the same or shorter RTs than one high-intensity airpuff. By contrast, on glabrous skin, detectability was significantly better when force was concentrated at a single point (1 X 1,600 dyn) than when diffused over a wide skin area (3 X 800 dyn). The enhanced sensitivity of hairy skin to airpuffs appears partially attributable to hair motion in the airstream. After hair removal by chemical depilation, detectability of airpuffs was reduced on hairy skin to a level equal to or below that on glabrous skin. Spatial summation on the depilated skin corresponded to that observed on the intact hairy skin, indicating that depilation did not abolish intensity discrimination, but rather lowered the overall sensitivity of hairy skin. These results show that hair follicle units form a very sensitive detection mechanism on hairy skin of the human hand, similar to that provided by Meissner's and Pacinian afferents in glabrous skin. These findings with airpuffs provide the first example of a tactile stimulus that is less effective for mechanoreceptors in glabrous skin than in hairy skin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Somatosensory research\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"281-302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/07367228509144569\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Somatosensory research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/07367228509144569\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Somatosensory research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/07367228509144569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20
摘要
为了比较无毛皮肤和有毛皮肤的相对敏感性,我们测量了6名受试者的反应时间(RTs)和可探测性(d’),这些气体被输送到有毛的背部和无毛的大足际隆起。与先前的机械接触刺激研究相比,应用于有毛皮肤的气胀比在无毛皮肤上测试的气胀具有相同或更高的保真度。在6名受试者中,有5名受试者同时使用气垫对毛状皮肤的平均rt - 3显着缩短(p < 0.005), 74%的配对疗程;在16%的疗程中观察到的平均RTs没有显著差异。然而,当测试单次吹气时,多毛皮肤的优势就不那么明显了,因为只有45%的配对过程中观察到明显更短的反应,38%的过程中几乎相同的反应。在高空气强度(1,600 dyn)下,有毛皮肤和无毛皮肤的气泡可探测性(d')相同,与RTs值无关,在低空气强度(800 dyn)下,有毛皮肤的气泡可探测性(n = 4)较好或相等(n = 2)。空间求和在有毛皮肤上比在无毛皮肤上更为明显。在85%的毛发皮肤组中,同时进行三次吹气比一次吹气产生的反应时间明显短于一次,而在无毛皮肤组中,这一比例仅为一半。刺激力的空间分布在多毛皮肤上不太重要,因为三次低强度吹气产生的RTs与一次高强度吹气产生的RTs相同或更短。相比之下,在无毛皮肤上,当力集中在一个点(1 X 1,600 dyn)时,可检测性明显优于扩散在一个广泛的皮肤区域(3 X 800 dyn)。多毛皮肤对气肿的敏感性增强似乎部分归因于毛发在气流中的运动。用化学脱毛法脱毛后,有毛皮肤上气肿的可探测性降低到等于或低于无毛皮肤的水平。脱毛皮肤的空间总和与完整毛状皮肤的空间总和相对应,说明脱毛并没有消除毛状皮肤的强度歧视,而是降低了毛状皮肤的整体敏感性。这些结果表明,毛囊单位在手部有毛皮肤上形成了一种非常敏感的检测机制,类似于无毛皮肤上的迈斯纳传入神经和帕西尼传入神经。这些关于气胀的发现提供了触觉刺激对无毛皮肤的机械感受器比毛皮肤的机械感受器效果差的第一个例子。(摘要删节为400字)
Differential sensitivity to airpuffs on human hairy and glabrous skin.
To compare the relative sensitivities of glabrous and hairy skin, we measured reaction times (RTs) and detectability (d') of airpuffs delivered to the hairy dorsum and glabrous thenar eminence of the hand of six human subjects. In contrast to previous studies with mechanical contact stimuli, airpuffs applied to hairy skin were detected with equal or greater fidelity than airpuffs tested on glabrous skin. Mean RTs to three simultaneously applied airpuffs were significantly shorter (p less than .005) on hairy skin in five of six subjects, and in 74% of paired sessions; no significant difference in mean RTs was observed in 16% of the sessions. The superiority of hairy skin was less evident, however, when single airpuffs were tested, as significantly shorter responses were observed on only 45% of the paired sessions, and nearly identical responses on 38% of the sessions. Detectability of airpuffs (d'), which is independent of the value of RTs, was identical on hairy and glabrous skin at high airpuff intensities (1,600 dyn), and superior (n = 4) or equal (n = 2) on hairy skin with low airpuff intensities (800 dyn). Spatial summation was more pronounced on hairy than on glabrous skin. Three simultaneously presented airpuffs produced significantly shorter RTs than one airpuff in 85% of the paired sessions on hairy skin, but on only half of the sessions on glabrous skin. The spatial distribution of stimulus force was less important on hairy skin, as three low-intensity airpuffs produced the same or shorter RTs than one high-intensity airpuff. By contrast, on glabrous skin, detectability was significantly better when force was concentrated at a single point (1 X 1,600 dyn) than when diffused over a wide skin area (3 X 800 dyn). The enhanced sensitivity of hairy skin to airpuffs appears partially attributable to hair motion in the airstream. After hair removal by chemical depilation, detectability of airpuffs was reduced on hairy skin to a level equal to or below that on glabrous skin. Spatial summation on the depilated skin corresponded to that observed on the intact hairy skin, indicating that depilation did not abolish intensity discrimination, but rather lowered the overall sensitivity of hairy skin. These results show that hair follicle units form a very sensitive detection mechanism on hairy skin of the human hand, similar to that provided by Meissner's and Pacinian afferents in glabrous skin. These findings with airpuffs provide the first example of a tactile stimulus that is less effective for mechanoreceptors in glabrous skin than in hairy skin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)