{"title":"实验性肾小球肾炎钠排泄障碍:对文献争议的解释。","authors":"A Chachati, J P Godon","doi":"10.1159/000173066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Considerable discrepancies exist in the literature concerning Na excretion by the rat kidney in experimental antiglomerular basement membrane (GBM) glomerulonephritis (GN). Previous studies in our laboratories demonstrated a disturbance in Na excretion with an impaired absolute (UNa X V) and fractional (FENa) excretion of Na after saline loading. However, most of the other authors in the literature failed to observe similar findings. The present study was undertaken to elucidate some of these controversies: We showed that a difference in Na excretion between anesthetized GN and normal rats might not be detected after a volume expansion if the latter is small or slow (FENa in GN 2 +/- 0.1%, in normals 2 +/- 0.2%; not significant). Only a rapid and important volume expansion is sufficient to unmask such a difference between the two groups (FENa 3 +/- 0.3 and 6 +/- 1%, respectively, p less than 0.001), and detect an impaired Na excretion in GN animals. The same amount of NaCl was nevertheless administered during slow and rapid volume expansion. Similarly, in GN conscious rats only after a saline load or repeated water loads did we observe a significantly smaller UNa X V compared to normals while no difference was present between the two groups after a single water load. In the literature, all the authors, that failed to demonstrate a disturbance in Na excretion in anti-GBM GN, administered slow and small isotonic saline loads to their rats. The hypothesis we formulate to explain these controversies is that the nonobserved disturbance in sodium excretion in most of these studies is probably secondary to insufficient natriuretic stimuli.</p>","PeriodicalId":77779,"journal":{"name":"Renal physiology","volume":"8 6","pages":"338-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000173066","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impaired sodium excretion in experimental glomerulonephritis: an explanation for the controversies in the literature.\",\"authors\":\"A Chachati, J P Godon\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000173066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Considerable discrepancies exist in the literature concerning Na excretion by the rat kidney in experimental antiglomerular basement membrane (GBM) glomerulonephritis (GN). Previous studies in our laboratories demonstrated a disturbance in Na excretion with an impaired absolute (UNa X V) and fractional (FENa) excretion of Na after saline loading. However, most of the other authors in the literature failed to observe similar findings. The present study was undertaken to elucidate some of these controversies: We showed that a difference in Na excretion between anesthetized GN and normal rats might not be detected after a volume expansion if the latter is small or slow (FENa in GN 2 +/- 0.1%, in normals 2 +/- 0.2%; not significant). Only a rapid and important volume expansion is sufficient to unmask such a difference between the two groups (FENa 3 +/- 0.3 and 6 +/- 1%, respectively, p less than 0.001), and detect an impaired Na excretion in GN animals. The same amount of NaCl was nevertheless administered during slow and rapid volume expansion. Similarly, in GN conscious rats only after a saline load or repeated water loads did we observe a significantly smaller UNa X V compared to normals while no difference was present between the two groups after a single water load. In the literature, all the authors, that failed to demonstrate a disturbance in Na excretion in anti-GBM GN, administered slow and small isotonic saline loads to their rats. The hypothesis we formulate to explain these controversies is that the nonobserved disturbance in sodium excretion in most of these studies is probably secondary to insufficient natriuretic stimuli.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renal physiology\",\"volume\":\"8 6\",\"pages\":\"338-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000173066\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renal physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000173066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renal physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000173066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
关于实验性抗肾小球基底膜(GBM)型肾小球肾炎(GN)大鼠肾脏钠排泄的文献存在相当大的差异。我们实验室先前的研究表明,在生理盐水负荷后,钠排泄紊乱,钠的绝对(UNa X V)和部分(FENa)排泄受损。然而,文献中的大多数其他作者都没有观察到类似的发现。本研究旨在阐明其中的一些争议:我们发现,如果正常大鼠的钠排泄量较小或缓慢,麻醉后的大鼠与正常大鼠的钠排泄量在容量扩张后可能无法检测到差异(GN的钠排泄量为2 +/- 0.1%,正常大鼠为2 +/- 0.2%;不显著)。只有快速而重要的体积扩张足以揭示两组之间的差异(fea分别为3 +/- 0.3和6 +/- 1%,p < 0.001),并检测GN动物的Na排泄受损。然而,在缓慢和快速的体积膨胀过程中,施用相同量的NaCl。同样,在GN意识大鼠中,只有在生理盐水负荷或重复水负荷后,我们才观察到与正常大鼠相比,UNa X V明显更小,而在单次水负荷后,两组之间没有差异。在文献中,所有未能证明抗gbm GN中Na排泄紊乱的作者都给他们的大鼠缓慢和小等渗盐水负荷。为了解释这些争议,我们提出的假设是,大多数研究中未观察到的钠排泄障碍可能是由于钠刺激不足引起的。
Impaired sodium excretion in experimental glomerulonephritis: an explanation for the controversies in the literature.
Considerable discrepancies exist in the literature concerning Na excretion by the rat kidney in experimental antiglomerular basement membrane (GBM) glomerulonephritis (GN). Previous studies in our laboratories demonstrated a disturbance in Na excretion with an impaired absolute (UNa X V) and fractional (FENa) excretion of Na after saline loading. However, most of the other authors in the literature failed to observe similar findings. The present study was undertaken to elucidate some of these controversies: We showed that a difference in Na excretion between anesthetized GN and normal rats might not be detected after a volume expansion if the latter is small or slow (FENa in GN 2 +/- 0.1%, in normals 2 +/- 0.2%; not significant). Only a rapid and important volume expansion is sufficient to unmask such a difference between the two groups (FENa 3 +/- 0.3 and 6 +/- 1%, respectively, p less than 0.001), and detect an impaired Na excretion in GN animals. The same amount of NaCl was nevertheless administered during slow and rapid volume expansion. Similarly, in GN conscious rats only after a saline load or repeated water loads did we observe a significantly smaller UNa X V compared to normals while no difference was present between the two groups after a single water load. In the literature, all the authors, that failed to demonstrate a disturbance in Na excretion in anti-GBM GN, administered slow and small isotonic saline loads to their rats. The hypothesis we formulate to explain these controversies is that the nonobserved disturbance in sodium excretion in most of these studies is probably secondary to insufficient natriuretic stimuli.