蓝舌病的研究。3.两种补体固定方法的比较。

P Boulanger, G M Ruckerbauer, G L Bannister, D P Gray, A Girard
{"title":"蓝舌病的研究。3.两种补体固定方法的比较。","authors":"P Boulanger,&nbsp;G M Ruckerbauer,&nbsp;G L Bannister,&nbsp;D P Gray,&nbsp;A Girard","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The complement-fixation test used at Onderstepoort was compared with the method used at A.D.R.I. on infected calf and sheep sera. In the first method, the tests are incubated at 37 degrees C for 90 minutes and the test sera are inactivated at 53 degrees C; whereas in the A.D.R.I. method, the test sera are inactivated at 60 degrees C for 30 minutes, incubation is at 9 degrees C for 18 hours, and guinea-pig complement is supplemented with 5 per cent fresh, non-inactivated, normal calf serum. Serial serum samples from one of six experimentally infected calves were negative in the Onderstepoort test, three calves gave only trace reactions and two showed maximum titres of 1:10 whereas all six had maximum serum titres of 1:10 to 1:80 in the A.D.R.I. test. A good correlation was obtained, however, between the results of the two methods with the sera of experimentally inoculated sheep although titres 3 to 8 times higher were obtained with the A.D.R.I.'s test. Post inoculation bleedings from each sheep reacted in both tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":72497,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of comparative medicine and veterinary science","volume":"31 7","pages":"166-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1967-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1494703/pdf/vetsci00008-0006.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studies on bluetongue. 3. Comparison of two complement-fixation methods.\",\"authors\":\"P Boulanger,&nbsp;G M Ruckerbauer,&nbsp;G L Bannister,&nbsp;D P Gray,&nbsp;A Girard\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The complement-fixation test used at Onderstepoort was compared with the method used at A.D.R.I. on infected calf and sheep sera. In the first method, the tests are incubated at 37 degrees C for 90 minutes and the test sera are inactivated at 53 degrees C; whereas in the A.D.R.I. method, the test sera are inactivated at 60 degrees C for 30 minutes, incubation is at 9 degrees C for 18 hours, and guinea-pig complement is supplemented with 5 per cent fresh, non-inactivated, normal calf serum. Serial serum samples from one of six experimentally infected calves were negative in the Onderstepoort test, three calves gave only trace reactions and two showed maximum titres of 1:10 whereas all six had maximum serum titres of 1:10 to 1:80 in the A.D.R.I. test. A good correlation was obtained, however, between the results of the two methods with the sera of experimentally inoculated sheep although titres 3 to 8 times higher were obtained with the A.D.R.I.'s test. Post inoculation bleedings from each sheep reacted in both tests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian journal of comparative medicine and veterinary science\",\"volume\":\"31 7\",\"pages\":\"166-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1967-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1494703/pdf/vetsci00008-0006.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian journal of comparative medicine and veterinary science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of comparative medicine and veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在Onderstepoort使用的补体固定试验与在A.D.R.I.使用的方法对感染的小牛和羊血清进行了比较。第一种方法是在37℃下孵育90分钟,在53℃下灭活检测血清;而在A.D.R.I.方法中,测试血清在60摄氏度下灭活30分钟,在9摄氏度下孵育18小时,在豚鼠补体中补充5%新鲜的、未灭活的正常小牛血清。6头实验感染小牛中的1头的连续血清样品在Onderstepoort试验中呈阴性,3头小牛仅出现微量反应,2头显示最大滴度为1:10,而在A.D.R.I.试验中,6头小牛的最大血清滴度均为1:10至1:80。然而,两种方法的结果与实验接种羊的血清具有良好的相关性,尽管用A.D.R.I.获得的滴度高出3至8倍的测试。接种后每只羊的出血在两项测试中都有反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Studies on bluetongue. 3. Comparison of two complement-fixation methods.

The complement-fixation test used at Onderstepoort was compared with the method used at A.D.R.I. on infected calf and sheep sera. In the first method, the tests are incubated at 37 degrees C for 90 minutes and the test sera are inactivated at 53 degrees C; whereas in the A.D.R.I. method, the test sera are inactivated at 60 degrees C for 30 minutes, incubation is at 9 degrees C for 18 hours, and guinea-pig complement is supplemented with 5 per cent fresh, non-inactivated, normal calf serum. Serial serum samples from one of six experimentally infected calves were negative in the Onderstepoort test, three calves gave only trace reactions and two showed maximum titres of 1:10 whereas all six had maximum serum titres of 1:10 to 1:80 in the A.D.R.I. test. A good correlation was obtained, however, between the results of the two methods with the sera of experimentally inoculated sheep although titres 3 to 8 times higher were obtained with the A.D.R.I.'s test. Post inoculation bleedings from each sheep reacted in both tests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ethics in the Veterinary Practice. Wildlife Disease. Cobalt Deficiency. Haemorrhagic Septicaemia. Riboflavin Deficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1