初级保健方案参与性评价的教育价值:厄瓜多尔四个土著居民的经验

A. Kroeger, H.P. Franken
{"title":"初级保健方案参与性评价的教育价值:厄瓜多尔四个土著居民的经验","authors":"A. Kroeger,&nbsp;H.P. Franken","doi":"10.1016/0160-7987(81)90027-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A seminar with basic health workers of four Indian groups in Ecuador serves as an example for the participatory evaluation of Primary Health Care (PHC)-programmes. Discussions in small groups, interpretation of visual aids derived from research data on health care utilization and practical evaluation exercises with the participants favoured the perception of opportunities and limitations which exist in the actual PHC-schemes. Main topics of discussion were: health impacts of socio-cultural change, community support of health workers, links with the hierarchy of the health care system, differential use of traditional and modern medicine, planification of future programmes. The final discussion with health officials was important for the mutual conscientization. The need for the involvement of communities and PHC-workers in the evaluation of regular programmes is stressed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79261,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part B, Medical anthropology","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 535-539"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0160-7987(81)90027-2","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The educational value of participatory evaluation of primary health care programmes: An experience with four indigenous populations in Ecuador\",\"authors\":\"A. Kroeger,&nbsp;H.P. Franken\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0160-7987(81)90027-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A seminar with basic health workers of four Indian groups in Ecuador serves as an example for the participatory evaluation of Primary Health Care (PHC)-programmes. Discussions in small groups, interpretation of visual aids derived from research data on health care utilization and practical evaluation exercises with the participants favoured the perception of opportunities and limitations which exist in the actual PHC-schemes. Main topics of discussion were: health impacts of socio-cultural change, community support of health workers, links with the hierarchy of the health care system, differential use of traditional and modern medicine, planification of future programmes. The final discussion with health officials was important for the mutual conscientization. The need for the involvement of communities and PHC-workers in the evaluation of regular programmes is stressed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social science & medicine. Part B, Medical anthropology\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 535-539\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0160-7987(81)90027-2\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social science & medicine. Part B, Medical anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0160798781900272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science & medicine. Part B, Medical anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0160798781900272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在厄瓜多尔与四个印第安群体的基本保健工作人员举行的研讨会是参与评价初级保健方案的一个范例。小组讨论、解释从保健利用研究数据中获得的视觉辅助资料以及与参与者进行的实际评价活动有利于认识到实际初级保健计划中存在的机会和限制。讨论的主要题目是:社会文化变化对健康的影响、社区对保健工作者的支持、与保健系统等级制度的联系、传统和现代医学的区别使用、未来方案的简化。与卫生官员的最后讨论对于相互觉悟很重要。强调社区和初级保健工作人员必须参与经常方案的评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The educational value of participatory evaluation of primary health care programmes: An experience with four indigenous populations in Ecuador

A seminar with basic health workers of four Indian groups in Ecuador serves as an example for the participatory evaluation of Primary Health Care (PHC)-programmes. Discussions in small groups, interpretation of visual aids derived from research data on health care utilization and practical evaluation exercises with the participants favoured the perception of opportunities and limitations which exist in the actual PHC-schemes. Main topics of discussion were: health impacts of socio-cultural change, community support of health workers, links with the hierarchy of the health care system, differential use of traditional and modern medicine, planification of future programmes. The final discussion with health officials was important for the mutual conscientization. The need for the involvement of communities and PHC-workers in the evaluation of regular programmes is stressed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The educational value of participatory evaluation of primary health care programmes: An experience with four indigenous populations in Ecuador ‘Tonic’, ‘fuel’ and ‘food’: Social and symbolic aspects of the long-term use of psychotropic drugs Ripe and unripe: Concepts of health and sickness in ayurvedic medicine Intestinal parasitism in seminomadic pastoralists and subsistence farmers in and around irrigation schemes in the Awash Valley, Ethiopia, with special emphasis on ecological and cultural associations Disease classification in rural Ghana: Framework and implications for health behaviour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1