76名医学检验专业大专学生认知风格调查。

B B Mays
{"title":"76名医学检验专业大专学生认知风格调查。","authors":"B B Mays","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The preferred learning styles of 76 associate degree medical laboratory technology students in four classes at two community colleges were assessed using the Modified Hill Cognitive Style Model. It was found that these students did not have a preference for finding meaning through spoken words or non-word symbols. They had little need to read body language or to be physically involved in order to learn; they preferred not to act out a role for acceptance, and they would have difficulty in influencing another's behavior. These students were capable of making decisions on their own and should do well studying independently. They preferred \"categorical reasoning\" as a basis for accepting or rejecting ideas and preferred to use deductive or syllogistic reasoning for inferences. Implications for instruction are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":76595,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of medical technology","volume":"49 10","pages":"719-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An investigation of the cognitive styles of 76 associate degree medical laboratory technology students.\",\"authors\":\"B B Mays\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The preferred learning styles of 76 associate degree medical laboratory technology students in four classes at two community colleges were assessed using the Modified Hill Cognitive Style Model. It was found that these students did not have a preference for finding meaning through spoken words or non-word symbols. They had little need to read body language or to be physically involved in order to learn; they preferred not to act out a role for acceptance, and they would have difficulty in influencing another's behavior. These students were capable of making decisions on their own and should do well studying independently. They preferred \\\"categorical reasoning\\\" as a basis for accepting or rejecting ideas and preferred to use deductive or syllogistic reasoning for inferences. Implications for instruction are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of medical technology\",\"volume\":\"49 10\",\"pages\":\"719-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of medical technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of medical technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用修正Hill认知风格模型对两所社区学院医学检验专业4个班76名大专学生的偏好学习风格进行了测评。研究发现,这些学生并不倾向于通过口语或非文字符号来寻找意义。他们几乎不需要阅读肢体语言,也不需要身体参与来学习;他们不愿意为了被接受而去扮演某个角色,而且他们很难影响他人的行为。这些学生有能力自己做决定,独立学习应该做得很好。他们更喜欢用“直言推理”作为接受或拒绝观点的基础,更喜欢用演绎推理或三段论推理来进行推理。讨论了对教学的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An investigation of the cognitive styles of 76 associate degree medical laboratory technology students.

The preferred learning styles of 76 associate degree medical laboratory technology students in four classes at two community colleges were assessed using the Modified Hill Cognitive Style Model. It was found that these students did not have a preference for finding meaning through spoken words or non-word symbols. They had little need to read body language or to be physically involved in order to learn; they preferred not to act out a role for acceptance, and they would have difficulty in influencing another's behavior. These students were capable of making decisions on their own and should do well studying independently. They preferred "categorical reasoning" as a basis for accepting or rejecting ideas and preferred to use deductive or syllogistic reasoning for inferences. Implications for instruction are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SOS. Detection of demyelination in multiple sclerosis by analysis of [Formula: see text] relaxation at 7 T. An explanation of the terminology and definitions recommended by the Committee for Clarification of the Nomenclature of Cells and Diseases of the Blood and Blood-Forming Organs. Case Study: Cystic Fibrosis Diagnosis complicated by group A streptococcus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1