澳大利亚大都市社区双目法定失明的原因。

Australian journal of ophthalmology Pub Date : 1983-11-01
F M Yeates
{"title":"澳大利亚大都市社区双目法定失明的原因。","authors":"F M Yeates","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Australian legal blindness is defined as bilateral corrected visual acuity less than 6/60; if visual acuity is better than this, collateral visual impairments may be included. Persons thus affected qualify for the Invalid Pension (Blindness). From October 1975 to June 1982, I studied clinical data of 311 persons assessed as legally blind, and recorded diagnoses. I personally examined 259 of these persons and a medical colleague examined 52. Examinees were resident in Brisbane (or environs), Australia. Eleven persons had asymmetrical conditions (analysed separately), and 300 had symmetrical conditions. Causes of the latter were genetically transmissible (20.3%), adult maculopathy (18%), congenital (12.7%), vascular (non-diabetic) (8.7%), adult glaucoma (8.3%), diabetes (7.3%), trauma (6%), and others (18.7%). Of 61 symmetrical genetic cases causes were retinitis pigmentosa (34.4%), congenital cataracts (16.4%), retinal dystrophy and maculopathy (13.1%), Leber's optic atrophy (9.8%), and others (26.3%). These results suggest that more attention should be directed to genetic counselling.</p>","PeriodicalId":78095,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of ophthalmology","volume":"11 4","pages":"321-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causes of binocular legal blindness in an australian metropolitan community.\",\"authors\":\"F M Yeates\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Australian legal blindness is defined as bilateral corrected visual acuity less than 6/60; if visual acuity is better than this, collateral visual impairments may be included. Persons thus affected qualify for the Invalid Pension (Blindness). From October 1975 to June 1982, I studied clinical data of 311 persons assessed as legally blind, and recorded diagnoses. I personally examined 259 of these persons and a medical colleague examined 52. Examinees were resident in Brisbane (or environs), Australia. Eleven persons had asymmetrical conditions (analysed separately), and 300 had symmetrical conditions. Causes of the latter were genetically transmissible (20.3%), adult maculopathy (18%), congenital (12.7%), vascular (non-diabetic) (8.7%), adult glaucoma (8.3%), diabetes (7.3%), trauma (6%), and others (18.7%). Of 61 symmetrical genetic cases causes were retinitis pigmentosa (34.4%), congenital cataracts (16.4%), retinal dystrophy and maculopathy (13.1%), Leber's optic atrophy (9.8%), and others (26.3%). These results suggest that more attention should be directed to genetic counselling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":78095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian journal of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"321-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian journal of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

澳大利亚法定失明定义为双眼矫正视力低于6/60;如果视敏度高于此,则可能包括附带视力损害。因此受影响的人有资格领取无效养恤金(失明)。从1975年10月到1982年6月,我研究了311例法定失明患者的临床资料,并记录了诊断结果。我亲自检查了其中259人,一名医学同事检查了52人。考生居住在澳大利亚布里斯班(或周边地区)。11人有不对称条件(单独分析),300人有对称条件。后者的病因包括遗传(20.3%)、成人黄斑病变(18%)、先天性(12.7%)、血管性(非糖尿病)(8.7%)、成人青光眼(8.3%)、糖尿病(7.3%)、外伤(6%)和其他(18.7%)。61例对称遗传病因为视网膜色素变性(34.4%)、先天性白内障(16.4%)、视网膜营养不良及黄斑病变(13.1%)、Leber’s视神经萎缩(9.8%)及其他(26.3%)。这些结果表明,应该更多地关注遗传咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Causes of binocular legal blindness in an australian metropolitan community.

Australian legal blindness is defined as bilateral corrected visual acuity less than 6/60; if visual acuity is better than this, collateral visual impairments may be included. Persons thus affected qualify for the Invalid Pension (Blindness). From October 1975 to June 1982, I studied clinical data of 311 persons assessed as legally blind, and recorded diagnoses. I personally examined 259 of these persons and a medical colleague examined 52. Examinees were resident in Brisbane (or environs), Australia. Eleven persons had asymmetrical conditions (analysed separately), and 300 had symmetrical conditions. Causes of the latter were genetically transmissible (20.3%), adult maculopathy (18%), congenital (12.7%), vascular (non-diabetic) (8.7%), adult glaucoma (8.3%), diabetes (7.3%), trauma (6%), and others (18.7%). Of 61 symmetrical genetic cases causes were retinitis pigmentosa (34.4%), congenital cataracts (16.4%), retinal dystrophy and maculopathy (13.1%), Leber's optic atrophy (9.8%), and others (26.3%). These results suggest that more attention should be directed to genetic counselling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Treatment of pigment epithelial detachments in the elderly. Neovascular glaucoma associated with ocular hypoperfusion secondary to carotid artery disease. Clinical management in the face of the uveal melanoma controversy. A ten-year hospital survey of eyelid cancer. The national registry of drug-induced ocular side effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1