用于评估消毒剂的定量悬浮试验比较。

G Reybrouck
{"title":"用于评估消毒剂的定量悬浮试验比较。","authors":"G Reybrouck","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The germicidal effect of two disinfectant standards has been determined by three quantitative suspension tests: the Dutch Standard-Suspension Test, the French AFNOR test, and the in vitro test. Particularly in case of Pseudomonas aeruginosa the germicidal-effect values found according to the three methods differ in a significant way (Tables 1 and 2). The only factors that could explain these differences, since they are not the same in the three techniques, are the preparation of the bacterial suspension and the diluent of the disinfectant solution. Through this the composition of the reaction mixture is different: in the in vitro test only 0.0085% NaC1 and 0.001% Tryptone are contained, in the AFNOR test the same constituants are ten times more concentrated and in the Standard-Suspension Test 0.882% NaC1 and 0.0306% albumin are present. If in the same trial these substances have been incorporated in the final concentration above-mentioned, then germicidal-effect values equal to those of the original tests have been obtained (Table 3). The disinfectant diluent and the bacterial suspension fluid have to be the main factors responsible for the differences in activity found by the three testing methods. In our opinion the in vitro test gives the clearest picture of the anti-bacterial properties of a disinfectant since in this test the less addition of extraneous matter is encountered.</p>","PeriodicalId":79283,"journal":{"name":"Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie. 1. Abt. Originale B, Hygiene, Krankenhaushygiene, Betriebshygiene, praventive Medizin","volume":"170 5-6","pages":"449-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of the quantitative suspension tests for the assessment of disinfectants.\",\"authors\":\"G Reybrouck\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The germicidal effect of two disinfectant standards has been determined by three quantitative suspension tests: the Dutch Standard-Suspension Test, the French AFNOR test, and the in vitro test. Particularly in case of Pseudomonas aeruginosa the germicidal-effect values found according to the three methods differ in a significant way (Tables 1 and 2). The only factors that could explain these differences, since they are not the same in the three techniques, are the preparation of the bacterial suspension and the diluent of the disinfectant solution. Through this the composition of the reaction mixture is different: in the in vitro test only 0.0085% NaC1 and 0.001% Tryptone are contained, in the AFNOR test the same constituants are ten times more concentrated and in the Standard-Suspension Test 0.882% NaC1 and 0.0306% albumin are present. If in the same trial these substances have been incorporated in the final concentration above-mentioned, then germicidal-effect values equal to those of the original tests have been obtained (Table 3). The disinfectant diluent and the bacterial suspension fluid have to be the main factors responsible for the differences in activity found by the three testing methods. In our opinion the in vitro test gives the clearest picture of the anti-bacterial properties of a disinfectant since in this test the less addition of extraneous matter is encountered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie. 1. Abt. Originale B, Hygiene, Krankenhaushygiene, Betriebshygiene, praventive Medizin\",\"volume\":\"170 5-6\",\"pages\":\"449-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1980-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie. 1. Abt. Originale B, Hygiene, Krankenhaushygiene, Betriebshygiene, praventive Medizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie. 1. Abt. Originale B, Hygiene, Krankenhaushygiene, Betriebshygiene, praventive Medizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

两种消毒剂标准的杀菌效果是通过三种定量悬浮试验确定的:荷兰标准悬浮试验、法国 AFNOR 试验和体外试验。特别是在铜绿假单胞菌方面,三种方法得出的杀菌效果值差异很大(表 1 和表 2)。由于这三种技术中的细菌悬浮液和消毒剂溶液的稀释剂不尽相同,因此唯一可以解释这些差异的因素是细菌悬浮液的制备。因此,反应混合物的成分也不同:在体外试验中只含有 0.0085% 的 NaC1 和 0.001% 的胰蛋白胨,而在 AFNOR 试验中,相同成分的浓度要高出十倍,而在标准悬浮试验中则含有 0.882% 的 NaC1 和 0.0306% 的白蛋白。如果在同一次试验中,这些物质的最终浓度达到上述水平,则可获得与原始试验相同的杀菌效果值(表 3)。消毒剂稀释液和细菌悬浮液是造成三种试验方法的活性差异的主要因素。我们认为,体外试验能最清楚地反映消毒剂的抗菌特性,因为在这种试验中,外来物质的添加量较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of the quantitative suspension tests for the assessment of disinfectants.

The germicidal effect of two disinfectant standards has been determined by three quantitative suspension tests: the Dutch Standard-Suspension Test, the French AFNOR test, and the in vitro test. Particularly in case of Pseudomonas aeruginosa the germicidal-effect values found according to the three methods differ in a significant way (Tables 1 and 2). The only factors that could explain these differences, since they are not the same in the three techniques, are the preparation of the bacterial suspension and the diluent of the disinfectant solution. Through this the composition of the reaction mixture is different: in the in vitro test only 0.0085% NaC1 and 0.001% Tryptone are contained, in the AFNOR test the same constituants are ten times more concentrated and in the Standard-Suspension Test 0.882% NaC1 and 0.0306% albumin are present. If in the same trial these substances have been incorporated in the final concentration above-mentioned, then germicidal-effect values equal to those of the original tests have been obtained (Table 3). The disinfectant diluent and the bacterial suspension fluid have to be the main factors responsible for the differences in activity found by the three testing methods. In our opinion the in vitro test gives the clearest picture of the anti-bacterial properties of a disinfectant since in this test the less addition of extraneous matter is encountered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Air pollution and biological defence (author's transl)]. [Computation for the sterilisation process in rendering plants (author's transl)]. [Rendering of animal material in the Netherlands (author's transl)]. [Essays on the history of rendering in Austria (author's transl)]. [The development of the American carcass rendering industry (author's transl)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1