中年心理治疗之路:一项纵向研究

Paul M. Gurwitz
{"title":"中年心理治疗之路:一项纵向研究","authors":"Paul M. Gurwitz","doi":"10.1016/0271-5384(81)90065-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This is a longitudinal study of the antecedents of entry into psychotherapy. The population studied consisted of 123 adults, aged 40–50, who had been subjects of long-term growth studies since childhood or early adolescence. These subjects were grouped according to whether or not they had sought psychotherapy within the period 1958–1970. Discriminant analysis was used to form composites of antecedent personality and life-course indicators that best distinguished those who sought psychotherapy in the study period from those who did not. Indicators of personality included a <em>Q</em>-sorted evaluation of psychological health and a series of assessment scales derived from the California Psychological Inventory; these variables were measured at the beginning of the study period. Indicators of life-events were obtained by systematically coding retrospective open-ended interviews that were conducted with each subject at the end of the study period. The two composites, along with indicators of demographic background, were entered into a path modelling procedure, to predict entry into psychotherapy.</p><p>The analysis uncovered differences between men and women in the pattern of “therapy-prone” personality and life-course. Men who entered therapy exhibited acting-out and impulsive personality traits, coupled with a life-events profile indicative of role-failure. Women exhibited a general psychological distress profile, with few distinct life-course characteristics. The independent variables accounted for between 57 and 79% of the variance in therapy-seeking; personality and life-course accounted for the bulk of the variation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79264,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part E, Medical psychology","volume":"15 1","pages":"Pages 67-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0271-5384(81)90065-X","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paths to psychotherapy in the middle years: A longitudinal study\",\"authors\":\"Paul M. Gurwitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0271-5384(81)90065-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This is a longitudinal study of the antecedents of entry into psychotherapy. The population studied consisted of 123 adults, aged 40–50, who had been subjects of long-term growth studies since childhood or early adolescence. These subjects were grouped according to whether or not they had sought psychotherapy within the period 1958–1970. Discriminant analysis was used to form composites of antecedent personality and life-course indicators that best distinguished those who sought psychotherapy in the study period from those who did not. Indicators of personality included a <em>Q</em>-sorted evaluation of psychological health and a series of assessment scales derived from the California Psychological Inventory; these variables were measured at the beginning of the study period. Indicators of life-events were obtained by systematically coding retrospective open-ended interviews that were conducted with each subject at the end of the study period. The two composites, along with indicators of demographic background, were entered into a path modelling procedure, to predict entry into psychotherapy.</p><p>The analysis uncovered differences between men and women in the pattern of “therapy-prone” personality and life-course. Men who entered therapy exhibited acting-out and impulsive personality traits, coupled with a life-events profile indicative of role-failure. Women exhibited a general psychological distress profile, with few distinct life-course characteristics. The independent variables accounted for between 57 and 79% of the variance in therapy-seeking; personality and life-course accounted for the bulk of the variation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social science & medicine. Part E, Medical psychology\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 67-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0271-5384(81)90065-X\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social science & medicine. Part E, Medical psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/027153848190065X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science & medicine. Part E, Medical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/027153848190065X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

这是一项关于心理治疗前因的纵向研究。研究对象包括123名年龄在40-50岁之间的成年人,他们从童年或青春期早期开始就一直是长期生长研究的对象。这些研究对象根据他们在1958-1970年期间是否接受过心理治疗进行分组。判别分析被用于形成前性人格和生命历程指标的组合,这些指标最能区分那些在研究期间寻求心理治疗的人和那些没有寻求心理治疗的人。人格指标包括心理健康的q分类评估和一系列来自加州心理量表的评估量表;这些变量是在研究开始时测量的。生活事件的指标是通过系统编码回顾性开放式访谈获得的,该访谈在研究期结束时对每个受试者进行。这两个组合,连同人口统计背景指标,被输入路径建模程序,以预测进入心理治疗。分析揭示了男性和女性在“倾向于治疗”的性格模式和生命历程上的差异。接受治疗的男性表现出行为失控和冲动的性格特征,以及表明角色失败的生活事件。女性表现出普遍的心理困扰,几乎没有明显的生命历程特征。自变量占寻求治疗差异的57%至79%;性格和人生历程是造成这种差异的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Paths to psychotherapy in the middle years: A longitudinal study

This is a longitudinal study of the antecedents of entry into psychotherapy. The population studied consisted of 123 adults, aged 40–50, who had been subjects of long-term growth studies since childhood or early adolescence. These subjects were grouped according to whether or not they had sought psychotherapy within the period 1958–1970. Discriminant analysis was used to form composites of antecedent personality and life-course indicators that best distinguished those who sought psychotherapy in the study period from those who did not. Indicators of personality included a Q-sorted evaluation of psychological health and a series of assessment scales derived from the California Psychological Inventory; these variables were measured at the beginning of the study period. Indicators of life-events were obtained by systematically coding retrospective open-ended interviews that were conducted with each subject at the end of the study period. The two composites, along with indicators of demographic background, were entered into a path modelling procedure, to predict entry into psychotherapy.

The analysis uncovered differences between men and women in the pattern of “therapy-prone” personality and life-course. Men who entered therapy exhibited acting-out and impulsive personality traits, coupled with a life-events profile indicative of role-failure. Women exhibited a general psychological distress profile, with few distinct life-course characteristics. The independent variables accounted for between 57 and 79% of the variance in therapy-seeking; personality and life-course accounted for the bulk of the variation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The interpretation of women's experience: A critical appraisal of the literature on breast cancer Parent talk at intensive care unit rounds Age- and sex-related differences in patterns of drug overdose and abuse Stressful life events, psychological symptoms, and psychosocial adjustment in Anglo, Black, and Cuban elderly The perception of different occupations within the medical profession
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1