出生位置和童年劣势

D.M. Fergusson, L.J. Horwood, F.T. Shannon
{"title":"出生位置和童年劣势","authors":"D.M. Fergusson,&nbsp;L.J. Horwood,&nbsp;F.T. Shannon","doi":"10.1016/0271-5384(81)90007-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The relationship between measures of childhood disadvantage and birth placement was studied in a birth cohort of New Zealand children.</p><p>Children who entered single parent families at birth were subject to a systematic pattern of disadvantage including poor preventive health care, greater risks of morbidity, depressed levels of childhood experience and exposure to pre-school education, impaired mother/child interaction patterns, depressed living standards and greater family instability. Adopted children fared best on all measures.</p><p>Factor analysis of the various indicators of childhood disadvantage showed that all loaded on a single common factor which had good face validity as being a general measure of multiple childhood disadvantage. Regression and path analyses showed that the apparent correlation between the child's birth placement and the multiple disadvantage score arose from the presence of a variety of conditions which were more prevalent in single parent families. In particular, single parent families had lower income levels, higher residential mobility, mothers in these families reported more problems and difficulties with child-rearing, experienced a greater number of adverse life events and were less satisfied with life in general. In addition, women with no formal educational qualifications and women of Maori or Pacific Island ethnic origin were over-represented in the population of single parent families. While the individual contribution of each of these factors was relatively small, the collective effect of the adverse conditions present for single parent families was to (apparently) produce a situation in which children in these families were clearly disadvantaged when compared with children from two parent and, particularly, adopted families. The implications of these findings are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79264,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part E, Medical psychology","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 315-326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0271-5384(81)90007-7","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Birth placement and childhood disadvantage\",\"authors\":\"D.M. Fergusson,&nbsp;L.J. Horwood,&nbsp;F.T. Shannon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0271-5384(81)90007-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The relationship between measures of childhood disadvantage and birth placement was studied in a birth cohort of New Zealand children.</p><p>Children who entered single parent families at birth were subject to a systematic pattern of disadvantage including poor preventive health care, greater risks of morbidity, depressed levels of childhood experience and exposure to pre-school education, impaired mother/child interaction patterns, depressed living standards and greater family instability. Adopted children fared best on all measures.</p><p>Factor analysis of the various indicators of childhood disadvantage showed that all loaded on a single common factor which had good face validity as being a general measure of multiple childhood disadvantage. Regression and path analyses showed that the apparent correlation between the child's birth placement and the multiple disadvantage score arose from the presence of a variety of conditions which were more prevalent in single parent families. In particular, single parent families had lower income levels, higher residential mobility, mothers in these families reported more problems and difficulties with child-rearing, experienced a greater number of adverse life events and were less satisfied with life in general. In addition, women with no formal educational qualifications and women of Maori or Pacific Island ethnic origin were over-represented in the population of single parent families. While the individual contribution of each of these factors was relatively small, the collective effect of the adverse conditions present for single parent families was to (apparently) produce a situation in which children in these families were clearly disadvantaged when compared with children from two parent and, particularly, adopted families. The implications of these findings are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social science & medicine. Part E, Medical psychology\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 315-326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0271-5384(81)90007-7\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social science & medicine. Part E, Medical psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0271538481900077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science & medicine. Part E, Medical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0271538481900077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

在新西兰儿童的出生队列中研究了童年不利条件和出生位置之间的关系。出生时进入单亲家庭的儿童处于系统性的不利状态,包括预防保健差、发病率高、童年经历和接受学前教育的程度低、母亲/儿童互动模式受损、生活水平低和家庭更不稳定。领养的孩子在所有方面都表现最好。因子分析表明,儿童多重劣势指标均加载在一个共同因子上,该因子具有良好的面效度,可作为衡量儿童多重劣势的一般指标。回归分析和路径分析表明,孩子的出生位置与多重劣势得分之间的明显相关性源于多种条件的存在,这些条件在单亲家庭中更为普遍。特别是,单亲家庭的收入水平较低,居住流动性较高,这些家庭的母亲在养育子女方面报告了更多的问题和困难,经历了更多的不良生活事件,总体上对生活的满意度较低。此外,没有受过正规教育的妇女和毛利人或太平洋岛屿族裔出身的妇女在单亲家庭人口中所占比例过高。虽然这些因素中的每个因素的个人贡献相对较小,但单亲家庭目前的不利条件的集体影响(显然)造成了这样一种情况,即这些家庭的儿童与双亲,特别是收养家庭的儿童相比,明显处于不利地位。讨论了这些发现的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Birth placement and childhood disadvantage

The relationship between measures of childhood disadvantage and birth placement was studied in a birth cohort of New Zealand children.

Children who entered single parent families at birth were subject to a systematic pattern of disadvantage including poor preventive health care, greater risks of morbidity, depressed levels of childhood experience and exposure to pre-school education, impaired mother/child interaction patterns, depressed living standards and greater family instability. Adopted children fared best on all measures.

Factor analysis of the various indicators of childhood disadvantage showed that all loaded on a single common factor which had good face validity as being a general measure of multiple childhood disadvantage. Regression and path analyses showed that the apparent correlation between the child's birth placement and the multiple disadvantage score arose from the presence of a variety of conditions which were more prevalent in single parent families. In particular, single parent families had lower income levels, higher residential mobility, mothers in these families reported more problems and difficulties with child-rearing, experienced a greater number of adverse life events and were less satisfied with life in general. In addition, women with no formal educational qualifications and women of Maori or Pacific Island ethnic origin were over-represented in the population of single parent families. While the individual contribution of each of these factors was relatively small, the collective effect of the adverse conditions present for single parent families was to (apparently) produce a situation in which children in these families were clearly disadvantaged when compared with children from two parent and, particularly, adopted families. The implications of these findings are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The interpretation of women's experience: A critical appraisal of the literature on breast cancer Parent talk at intensive care unit rounds Age- and sex-related differences in patterns of drug overdose and abuse Stressful life events, psychological symptoms, and psychosocial adjustment in Anglo, Black, and Cuban elderly The perception of different occupations within the medical profession
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1