[26-34周妊娠胎膜早破(PRM)处理的初步临床研究]。

J Apavaloaie, A Negura, A Balasiu, D Mustata
{"title":"[26-34周妊娠胎膜早破(PRM)处理的初步临床研究]。","authors":"J Apavaloaie,&nbsp;A Negura,&nbsp;A Balasiu,&nbsp;D Mustata","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the optimal solution to the dilemma of \"wait-and-see\" or \"evacuation of uterine contents\" and to identify objective criteria in support of one or other of these management choices, in particular in 26-34 week pregnancies with PRM, which is the most difficult situation. On the basis of a clinical study of 54 cases, week pregnancies with PRM did not enable temporization for any considerable time because of the onset of amniotic infection, and a large number of premature newborn with a gestational age of 31-32 weeks, below 1500-1700 g respectively, died a short time after birth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In 26-34 week pregnancies with PRM, a \"wait-and-see\" attitude with its sometimes very considerable septic risks is justified by a high chance of fetal survival score (CFSS)--a concept suggested by the authors--, i.e. with a gestational age between 30-34 weeks and respective fetal weights (determined by ultrasonography) between 1400-2100 g, absence of intrauterine fetal pathology, favorable fetal vitality parameters, good prognosis foe vaginal delivery, low C-reactive protein levels, low-grade pathogenicity of cervicovaginal flora, etc. In their preliminary study, the authors suggest determination of a chance of fetal survival score (CFSS) which is of prognostic value and can be useful in determining optimal management in the dilemma raised by PRM in 26-34 week pregnancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21300,"journal":{"name":"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Preliminary clinical study on the management of 26-34 week pregnancy with premature rupture of the membranes (PRM)].\",\"authors\":\"J Apavaloaie,&nbsp;A Negura,&nbsp;A Balasiu,&nbsp;D Mustata\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the optimal solution to the dilemma of \\\"wait-and-see\\\" or \\\"evacuation of uterine contents\\\" and to identify objective criteria in support of one or other of these management choices, in particular in 26-34 week pregnancies with PRM, which is the most difficult situation. On the basis of a clinical study of 54 cases, week pregnancies with PRM did not enable temporization for any considerable time because of the onset of amniotic infection, and a large number of premature newborn with a gestational age of 31-32 weeks, below 1500-1700 g respectively, died a short time after birth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In 26-34 week pregnancies with PRM, a \\\"wait-and-see\\\" attitude with its sometimes very considerable septic risks is justified by a high chance of fetal survival score (CFSS)--a concept suggested by the authors--, i.e. with a gestational age between 30-34 weeks and respective fetal weights (determined by ultrasonography) between 1400-2100 g, absence of intrauterine fetal pathology, favorable fetal vitality parameters, good prognosis foe vaginal delivery, low C-reactive protein levels, low-grade pathogenicity of cervicovaginal flora, etc. In their preliminary study, the authors suggest determination of a chance of fetal survival score (CFSS) which is of prognostic value and can be useful in determining optimal management in the dilemma raised by PRM in 26-34 week pregnancies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

未标记:本研究的目的是确定“观望”或“子宫内容物清除”困境的最佳解决方案,并确定支持这些管理选择中的一种或另一种的客观标准,特别是妊娠26-34周的PRM,这是最困难的情况。根据54例临床研究,由于羊膜感染的发生,PRM周妊娠无法在相当长的时间内进行胎动,大量胎龄在31-32周,分别低于1500-1700 g的早产儿在出生后短时间内死亡。结论:在妊娠26-34周的PRM中,由于胎儿生存评分(CFSS)的高机会(作者提出的概念),即胎龄在30-34周之间,各自的胎儿体重(由超声确定)在1400-2100 g之间,没有宫内胎儿病理,胎儿活力参数有利,阴道分娩预后良好,c反应蛋白水平低,因此对其有时非常大的脓毒性风险持“等待和观察”态度。宫颈阴道菌群的低度致病性等。在他们的初步研究中,作者建议确定胎儿生存评分(CFSS)的机会,它具有预后价值,可以用于确定26-34周妊娠期间PRM引起的困境的最佳管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Preliminary clinical study on the management of 26-34 week pregnancy with premature rupture of the membranes (PRM)].

Unlabelled: The aim of this study was to determine the optimal solution to the dilemma of "wait-and-see" or "evacuation of uterine contents" and to identify objective criteria in support of one or other of these management choices, in particular in 26-34 week pregnancies with PRM, which is the most difficult situation. On the basis of a clinical study of 54 cases, week pregnancies with PRM did not enable temporization for any considerable time because of the onset of amniotic infection, and a large number of premature newborn with a gestational age of 31-32 weeks, below 1500-1700 g respectively, died a short time after birth.

Conclusions: In 26-34 week pregnancies with PRM, a "wait-and-see" attitude with its sometimes very considerable septic risks is justified by a high chance of fetal survival score (CFSS)--a concept suggested by the authors--, i.e. with a gestational age between 30-34 weeks and respective fetal weights (determined by ultrasonography) between 1400-2100 g, absence of intrauterine fetal pathology, favorable fetal vitality parameters, good prognosis foe vaginal delivery, low C-reactive protein levels, low-grade pathogenicity of cervicovaginal flora, etc. In their preliminary study, the authors suggest determination of a chance of fetal survival score (CFSS) which is of prognostic value and can be useful in determining optimal management in the dilemma raised by PRM in 26-34 week pregnancies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Granulomatous endometritis]. [Vaginal sacral-spinal fixation or Richter's procedure. Experience of a surgical team with 54 cases]. [Granulomatous mastitis]. [Pregnancy after transposition and repositioning of the ovaries in a patient with clear-cell adenocarcinoma]. [Struma ovarii. A case report].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1