{"title":"[26-34周妊娠胎膜早破(PRM)处理的初步临床研究]。","authors":"J Apavaloaie, A Negura, A Balasiu, D Mustata","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the optimal solution to the dilemma of \"wait-and-see\" or \"evacuation of uterine contents\" and to identify objective criteria in support of one or other of these management choices, in particular in 26-34 week pregnancies with PRM, which is the most difficult situation. On the basis of a clinical study of 54 cases, week pregnancies with PRM did not enable temporization for any considerable time because of the onset of amniotic infection, and a large number of premature newborn with a gestational age of 31-32 weeks, below 1500-1700 g respectively, died a short time after birth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In 26-34 week pregnancies with PRM, a \"wait-and-see\" attitude with its sometimes very considerable septic risks is justified by a high chance of fetal survival score (CFSS)--a concept suggested by the authors--, i.e. with a gestational age between 30-34 weeks and respective fetal weights (determined by ultrasonography) between 1400-2100 g, absence of intrauterine fetal pathology, favorable fetal vitality parameters, good prognosis foe vaginal delivery, low C-reactive protein levels, low-grade pathogenicity of cervicovaginal flora, etc. In their preliminary study, the authors suggest determination of a chance of fetal survival score (CFSS) which is of prognostic value and can be useful in determining optimal management in the dilemma raised by PRM in 26-34 week pregnancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21300,"journal":{"name":"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique","volume":"90 7-9","pages":"342-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Preliminary clinical study on the management of 26-34 week pregnancy with premature rupture of the membranes (PRM)].\",\"authors\":\"J Apavaloaie, A Negura, A Balasiu, D Mustata\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the optimal solution to the dilemma of \\\"wait-and-see\\\" or \\\"evacuation of uterine contents\\\" and to identify objective criteria in support of one or other of these management choices, in particular in 26-34 week pregnancies with PRM, which is the most difficult situation. On the basis of a clinical study of 54 cases, week pregnancies with PRM did not enable temporization for any considerable time because of the onset of amniotic infection, and a large number of premature newborn with a gestational age of 31-32 weeks, below 1500-1700 g respectively, died a short time after birth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In 26-34 week pregnancies with PRM, a \\\"wait-and-see\\\" attitude with its sometimes very considerable septic risks is justified by a high chance of fetal survival score (CFSS)--a concept suggested by the authors--, i.e. with a gestational age between 30-34 weeks and respective fetal weights (determined by ultrasonography) between 1400-2100 g, absence of intrauterine fetal pathology, favorable fetal vitality parameters, good prognosis foe vaginal delivery, low C-reactive protein levels, low-grade pathogenicity of cervicovaginal flora, etc. In their preliminary study, the authors suggest determination of a chance of fetal survival score (CFSS) which is of prognostic value and can be useful in determining optimal management in the dilemma raised by PRM in 26-34 week pregnancies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique\",\"volume\":\"90 7-9\",\"pages\":\"342-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Preliminary clinical study on the management of 26-34 week pregnancy with premature rupture of the membranes (PRM)].
Unlabelled: The aim of this study was to determine the optimal solution to the dilemma of "wait-and-see" or "evacuation of uterine contents" and to identify objective criteria in support of one or other of these management choices, in particular in 26-34 week pregnancies with PRM, which is the most difficult situation. On the basis of a clinical study of 54 cases, week pregnancies with PRM did not enable temporization for any considerable time because of the onset of amniotic infection, and a large number of premature newborn with a gestational age of 31-32 weeks, below 1500-1700 g respectively, died a short time after birth.
Conclusions: In 26-34 week pregnancies with PRM, a "wait-and-see" attitude with its sometimes very considerable septic risks is justified by a high chance of fetal survival score (CFSS)--a concept suggested by the authors--, i.e. with a gestational age between 30-34 weeks and respective fetal weights (determined by ultrasonography) between 1400-2100 g, absence of intrauterine fetal pathology, favorable fetal vitality parameters, good prognosis foe vaginal delivery, low C-reactive protein levels, low-grade pathogenicity of cervicovaginal flora, etc. In their preliminary study, the authors suggest determination of a chance of fetal survival score (CFSS) which is of prognostic value and can be useful in determining optimal management in the dilemma raised by PRM in 26-34 week pregnancies.