激光和责任。

Optometry clinics : the official publication of the Prentice Society Pub Date : 1995-01-01

J G Classé

{"title":"激光和责任。","authors":"J G Classé","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ophthalmic laser procedures are not a significant cause of liability claims. When claims are brought, they usually allege negligence, breach of the doctrine of informed consent, or both. The most likely cause of a liability claim is laser photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. Among anterior segment procedures, treatment for glaucoma is most likely to produce a claim.","PeriodicalId":77312,"journal":{"name":"Optometry clinics : the official publication of the Prentice Society","volume":"4 4","pages":"113-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lasers and liability.\",\"authors\":\"J G Classé\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ophthalmic laser procedures are not a significant cause of liability claims. When claims are brought, they usually allege negligence, breach of the doctrine of informed consent, or both. The most likely cause of a liability claim is laser photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. Among anterior segment procedures, treatment for glaucoma is most likely to produce a claim.\",\"PeriodicalId\":77312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optometry clinics : the official publication of the Prentice Society\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"113-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optometry clinics : the official publication of the Prentice Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry clinics : the official publication of the Prentice Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

眼科激光手术不是责任索赔的重要原因。当提出索赔时，他们通常指控疏忽，违反知情同意原则，或两者兼而有之。最可能引起责任索赔的原因是激光光凝治疗糖尿病视网膜病变。在前节段手术中，青光眼的治疗最有可能产生索赔。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Lasers and liability.

Ophthalmic laser procedures are not a significant cause of liability claims. When claims are brought, they usually allege negligence, breach of the doctrine of informed consent, or both. The most likely cause of a liability claim is laser photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. Among anterior segment procedures, treatment for glaucoma is most likely to produce a claim.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Optometry clinics : the official publication of the Prentice Society

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

Hyphema. Cystoid macular edema. Pediatric primary care vision examination. Pediatric growth and development. Pharmacological considerations for the pediatric patient.