膀胱颈切开治疗前列腺增生的疗效及安全性。

P Hellström, T Tammela, A Mehik, O Lukkarinen, M Kontturi
{"title":"膀胱颈切开治疗前列腺增生的疗效及安全性。","authors":"P Hellström,&nbsp;T Tammela,&nbsp;A Mehik,&nbsp;O Lukkarinen,&nbsp;M Kontturi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A prospective series of 104 patients underwent bladder neck incision (44 unilateral and 60 bilateral) for urinary obstruction caused by a small benign prostate enlargement. The preoperative mean peak flow value improved significantly from 11.4 ml/s to 16.2 ml/s. There were no significant differences in peak flow values between the unilateral and bilateral incision groups. Subjective results seemed to be similar but transurethral resection of the prostate was needed more often after unilateral incision than after bilateral incision. Postoperative complications were recorded only in the bilateral incision group. Altogether 62% of the patients reported changes in erection or ejaculation ability. Bladder neck incision seems to be an effective means of treating urinary obstruction but adverse effects on sexual function are common, which should be kept in mind when offering this treatment to sexually active men. It can be regarded as the treatment of choice for older men with infravesical obstruction caused by a small prostate enlargement.</p>","PeriodicalId":75497,"journal":{"name":"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae. Supplementum","volume":"206 ","pages":"19-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of bladder neck incision in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.\",\"authors\":\"P Hellström,&nbsp;T Tammela,&nbsp;A Mehik,&nbsp;O Lukkarinen,&nbsp;M Kontturi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A prospective series of 104 patients underwent bladder neck incision (44 unilateral and 60 bilateral) for urinary obstruction caused by a small benign prostate enlargement. The preoperative mean peak flow value improved significantly from 11.4 ml/s to 16.2 ml/s. There were no significant differences in peak flow values between the unilateral and bilateral incision groups. Subjective results seemed to be similar but transurethral resection of the prostate was needed more often after unilateral incision than after bilateral incision. Postoperative complications were recorded only in the bilateral incision group. Altogether 62% of the patients reported changes in erection or ejaculation ability. Bladder neck incision seems to be an effective means of treating urinary obstruction but adverse effects on sexual function are common, which should be kept in mind when offering this treatment to sexually active men. It can be regarded as the treatment of choice for older men with infravesical obstruction caused by a small prostate enlargement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae. Supplementum\",\"volume\":\"206 \",\"pages\":\"19-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae. Supplementum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前瞻性研究104例患者(44例单侧,60例双侧)因良性前列腺肿大引起的尿路梗阻而行膀胱颈切开。术前平均峰值流量由11.4 ml/s显著提高至16.2 ml/s。单侧和双侧切口组的血流峰值无显著差异。主观结果似乎相似,但单侧切口比双侧切口更需要经尿道前列腺切除术。仅双侧切口组出现术后并发症。62%的患者报告勃起或射精能力发生了变化。膀胱颈切开似乎是治疗尿路梗阻的有效方法,但对性功能的不良影响是常见的,在向性活跃的男性提供这种治疗时应牢记这一点。对于小前列腺肿大引起的膀胱下梗阻的老年男性,它可以被视为治疗的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of bladder neck incision in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

A prospective series of 104 patients underwent bladder neck incision (44 unilateral and 60 bilateral) for urinary obstruction caused by a small benign prostate enlargement. The preoperative mean peak flow value improved significantly from 11.4 ml/s to 16.2 ml/s. There were no significant differences in peak flow values between the unilateral and bilateral incision groups. Subjective results seemed to be similar but transurethral resection of the prostate was needed more often after unilateral incision than after bilateral incision. Postoperative complications were recorded only in the bilateral incision group. Altogether 62% of the patients reported changes in erection or ejaculation ability. Bladder neck incision seems to be an effective means of treating urinary obstruction but adverse effects on sexual function are common, which should be kept in mind when offering this treatment to sexually active men. It can be regarded as the treatment of choice for older men with infravesical obstruction caused by a small prostate enlargement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Treatment of chronic critical leg ischaemia--a cost benefit analysis. The effect of tumor necrosis factor-alpha on wound healing. An experimental study. Open biliary tract surgery on 2023 patients based on personal experience. A clinical study. Surgical results of lumbar spinal stenosis. Microinvasive lumbar disc surgery. A study on patients treated with microdiscectomy or percutaneous nucleotomy for disc herniation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1