阿特拉津遗传毒性评估:与人类健康和环境影响的相关性

David J. Brusick
{"title":"阿特拉津遗传毒性评估:与人类健康和环境影响的相关性","authors":"David J. Brusick","doi":"10.1016/0165-1110(94)90021-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The genetic toxicity of atrazine, a member of the <em>s</em>-triazine herbicides, was reviewed with the objective of classifying the chemical. Atrazine has been subjected to a broad range of genetic tests with predominantly negative results. Some publications, specifically those measuring dominant lethality in mice and bone marrow clastogenicity in rodents, reported conflicting results across two or more independent tests. Two approaches were employed to evaluate and interpret the results. The first approach attempts to classify each type of genetic endpoint as positive or negative and resolve test conflicts by critical assessment of the study and detailed data. This is the more traditional “expert judgment” approach to hazard assessment. The second approach employs a computer-assisted weight-of-evidence method of data analysis. This approach does not require resolution of conflicts but uses all data sets to arrive at a classification of hazard. The first approach was able to resolve some conflicts but not all. Use of the “expert judgement” results in an equivocal conclusion and classification. Use of the weight-of-evidence method resulted in a conclusion that atrazine does not pose a mutagenic hazard. The weight-of-evidence scheme is proposed to be a more practical and relevant approach for assessing complex data sets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100940,"journal":{"name":"Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-1110(94)90021-3","citationCount":"62","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of the genetic toxicity of atrazine: Relevance to human health and environmental effects\",\"authors\":\"David J. Brusick\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0165-1110(94)90021-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The genetic toxicity of atrazine, a member of the <em>s</em>-triazine herbicides, was reviewed with the objective of classifying the chemical. Atrazine has been subjected to a broad range of genetic tests with predominantly negative results. Some publications, specifically those measuring dominant lethality in mice and bone marrow clastogenicity in rodents, reported conflicting results across two or more independent tests. Two approaches were employed to evaluate and interpret the results. The first approach attempts to classify each type of genetic endpoint as positive or negative and resolve test conflicts by critical assessment of the study and detailed data. This is the more traditional “expert judgment” approach to hazard assessment. The second approach employs a computer-assisted weight-of-evidence method of data analysis. This approach does not require resolution of conflicts but uses all data sets to arrive at a classification of hazard. The first approach was able to resolve some conflicts but not all. Use of the “expert judgement” results in an equivocal conclusion and classification. Use of the weight-of-evidence method resulted in a conclusion that atrazine does not pose a mutagenic hazard. The weight-of-evidence scheme is proposed to be a more practical and relevant approach for assessing complex data sets.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-1110(94)90021-3\",\"citationCount\":\"62\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165111094900213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165111094900213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62

摘要

综述了s-三嗪类除草剂阿特拉津的遗传毒性,并对其进行了分类。对阿特拉津进行了广泛的基因检测,结果主要是阴性。一些出版物,特别是那些测量小鼠的显性致死率和啮齿动物的骨髓破碎性的出版物,在两个或多个独立测试中报告了相互矛盾的结果。采用了两种方法来评估和解释结果。第一种方法试图将每种类型的遗传终点分类为阳性或阴性,并通过对研究和详细数据的批判性评估来解决测试冲突。这是更传统的危害评估“专家判断”方法。第二种方法采用计算机辅助的证据权重法进行数据分析。这种方法不需要解决冲突,而是使用所有数据集来对危险进行分类。第一种方法能够解决一些冲突,但不是全部。使用“专家判断”会导致模棱两可的结论和分类。使用证据权重法得出结论,阿特拉津不具有致突变危险。证据权重方案被认为是评估复杂数据集的一种更实用和相关的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An assessment of the genetic toxicity of atrazine: Relevance to human health and environmental effects

The genetic toxicity of atrazine, a member of the s-triazine herbicides, was reviewed with the objective of classifying the chemical. Atrazine has been subjected to a broad range of genetic tests with predominantly negative results. Some publications, specifically those measuring dominant lethality in mice and bone marrow clastogenicity in rodents, reported conflicting results across two or more independent tests. Two approaches were employed to evaluate and interpret the results. The first approach attempts to classify each type of genetic endpoint as positive or negative and resolve test conflicts by critical assessment of the study and detailed data. This is the more traditional “expert judgment” approach to hazard assessment. The second approach employs a computer-assisted weight-of-evidence method of data analysis. This approach does not require resolution of conflicts but uses all data sets to arrive at a classification of hazard. The first approach was able to resolve some conflicts but not all. Use of the “expert judgement” results in an equivocal conclusion and classification. Use of the weight-of-evidence method resulted in a conclusion that atrazine does not pose a mutagenic hazard. The weight-of-evidence scheme is proposed to be a more practical and relevant approach for assessing complex data sets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DNA adducts and chronic degenerative diseases. Pathogenetic relevance and implications in preventive medicine Carbon tetrachloride: Genetic effects and other modes of action Dr. Hans F. Stich, Professor Emeritus of the University of British Columbia, 1927–1995 Product review Foreword
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1