秘密私有化?

Health visitor Pub Date : 1995-03-01

A Pollock

{"title":"秘密私有化?","authors":"A Pollock","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"'Government lights the fuse for privatisation' blazed the Health visitor journal's front cover when the NHS and Community Care Act was passed in 1990. Since then the debate on the future of the NHS has raged. In the first of a series in which different authors look at policy issues, Allyson Pollock argues that the introduction of charges for dentistry, eye tests and long-term care--is undermining the principle of a universal national healthcare service, free at the point of use.","PeriodicalId":75899,"journal":{"name":"Health visitor","volume":"68 3","pages":"98-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privatisation by stealth?\",\"authors\":\"A Pollock\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"'Government lights the fuse for privatisation' blazed the Health visitor journal's front cover when the NHS and Community Care Act was passed in 1990. Since then the debate on the future of the NHS has raged. In the first of a series in which different authors look at policy issues, Allyson Pollock argues that the introduction of charges for dentistry, eye tests and long-term care--is undermining the principle of a universal national healthcare service, free at the point of use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health visitor\",\"volume\":\"68 3\",\"pages\":\"98-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health visitor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health visitor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

1990年《国民保健服务和社区护理法案》通过时，《健康访客》杂志的封面上写着“政府点燃了私有化的导火索”。从那以后，关于NHS未来的争论愈演愈烈。在一系列不同作者探讨政策问题的文章中，阿利森·波洛克(Allyson Pollock)认为，对牙科、眼科检查和长期护理收费的引入，正在破坏全民医疗保健服务的原则，即在使用时免费。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Privatisation by stealth?

'Government lights the fuse for privatisation' blazed the Health visitor journal's front cover when the NHS and Community Care Act was passed in 1990. Since then the debate on the future of the NHS has raged. In the first of a series in which different authors look at policy issues, Allyson Pollock argues that the introduction of charges for dentistry, eye tests and long-term care--is undermining the principle of a universal national healthcare service, free at the point of use.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助