多中心双盲研究确定尼美舒利治疗骨关节炎的疗效/安全性的最佳剂量。

P Bourgeois, R L Dreiser, M G Lequesne, A Macciocchi, T Monti
{"title":"多中心双盲研究确定尼美舒利治疗骨关节炎的疗效/安全性的最佳剂量。","authors":"P Bourgeois,&nbsp;R L Dreiser,&nbsp;M G Lequesne,&nbsp;A Macciocchi,&nbsp;T Monti","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A parallel group study for one month of 392 patients was undertaken to define the optimal dose of nimesulide for the treatment of painful osteoarthritis (OA). By the final visit, the mean values for pain intensity for the nimesulide groups (50 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg bd) were similar and significantly lower than the mean for the placebo group. The onset of analgesia was rapid and continued throughout the 12-hour period after drug intake, a significant analgesic effect was demonstrated with nimesulide 100 mg and 200 mg within 1.5 hours. The patients' and the physicians' overall judgements of the drug efficacy demonstrated significant differences between the treatment groups with the most successful outcomes occurring with nimesulide 100 mg and 200 mg. Nimesulide 50 mg and 100 mg were generally well-tolerated but at the highest dose level, nimesulide 200 mg, the incidence of adverse events was greater although not significantly. Results of this study demonstrate nimesulide 100 mg twice daily to be the optimal dose for the treatment of OA.</p>","PeriodicalId":12056,"journal":{"name":"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation","volume":"14 2","pages":"39-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-centre double-blind study to define the most favourable dose of nimesulide in terms of efficacy/safety ratio in the treatment of osteoarthritis.\",\"authors\":\"P Bourgeois,&nbsp;R L Dreiser,&nbsp;M G Lequesne,&nbsp;A Macciocchi,&nbsp;T Monti\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A parallel group study for one month of 392 patients was undertaken to define the optimal dose of nimesulide for the treatment of painful osteoarthritis (OA). By the final visit, the mean values for pain intensity for the nimesulide groups (50 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg bd) were similar and significantly lower than the mean for the placebo group. The onset of analgesia was rapid and continued throughout the 12-hour period after drug intake, a significant analgesic effect was demonstrated with nimesulide 100 mg and 200 mg within 1.5 hours. The patients' and the physicians' overall judgements of the drug efficacy demonstrated significant differences between the treatment groups with the most successful outcomes occurring with nimesulide 100 mg and 200 mg. Nimesulide 50 mg and 100 mg were generally well-tolerated but at the highest dose level, nimesulide 200 mg, the incidence of adverse events was greater although not significantly. Results of this study demonstrate nimesulide 100 mg twice daily to be the optimal dose for the treatment of OA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"39-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对392例患者进行了为期一个月的平行组研究,以确定尼美舒利治疗疼痛性骨关节炎(OA)的最佳剂量。到最后一次访问时,尼美舒利组(50mg, 100mg和200mg每日)的疼痛强度平均值与安慰剂组相似,且显著低于安慰剂组的平均值。尼美舒利100mg和200mg在用药后的1.5小时内镇痛效果显著,镇痛起效迅速且持续12小时。两组患者和医生对药物疗效的总体判断存在显著差异,尼美舒利100 mg和200 mg组疗效最好。尼美舒利50毫克和100毫克的耐受性一般良好,但在最高剂量水平,尼美舒利200毫克,不良事件的发生率更高,尽管不明显。本研究结果表明尼美舒利100mg每日两次是治疗OA的最佳剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multi-centre double-blind study to define the most favourable dose of nimesulide in terms of efficacy/safety ratio in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

A parallel group study for one month of 392 patients was undertaken to define the optimal dose of nimesulide for the treatment of painful osteoarthritis (OA). By the final visit, the mean values for pain intensity for the nimesulide groups (50 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg bd) were similar and significantly lower than the mean for the placebo group. The onset of analgesia was rapid and continued throughout the 12-hour period after drug intake, a significant analgesic effect was demonstrated with nimesulide 100 mg and 200 mg within 1.5 hours. The patients' and the physicians' overall judgements of the drug efficacy demonstrated significant differences between the treatment groups with the most successful outcomes occurring with nimesulide 100 mg and 200 mg. Nimesulide 50 mg and 100 mg were generally well-tolerated but at the highest dose level, nimesulide 200 mg, the incidence of adverse events was greater although not significantly. Results of this study demonstrate nimesulide 100 mg twice daily to be the optimal dose for the treatment of OA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flurbiprofen local action transcutaneous (LAT): clinical evaluation in the treatment of acute ankle sprains. NSAIDs and the gut--where are we now? Review of Arthrotec clinical data. Rheumatological audit--a general practice perspective. Arthrotec, diclofenac and ibuprofen in general practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1