双氯芬酸/米索前列醇与双氯芬酸治疗类风湿性关节炎疗效的双盲比较。

M V de Queiroz, A Beaulieu, K Kruger, E Woods, H Stead, S Geis
{"title":"双氯芬酸/米索前列醇与双氯芬酸治疗类风湿性关节炎疗效的双盲比较。","authors":"M V de Queiroz,&nbsp;A Beaulieu,&nbsp;K Kruger,&nbsp;E Woods,&nbsp;H Stead,&nbsp;S Geis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study was conducted in eight countries to compare the efficacy of a fixed combination of diclofenac sodium (50 mg) and misoprostol (200 mcg) with a fixed combination of diclofenac sodium (50 mg) and placebo in treating the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A total of 346 patients with RA who had been stabilised on diclofenac for at least 30 days were randomly assigned to receive either diclofenac/misoprostol BID or TID (n = 177) or diclofenac/placebo BID or TID (n = 169) for 12 weeks. Primary analyses of efficacy, made upon admission and at 4-week intervals, consisted of physician's global assessment of the arthritic condition, patient's global assessment of the arthritic condition, patient's global assessment of joint tenderness/pain, and physician's assessment of joint swelling. In this study, the fixed combination tablet of diclofenac sodium 50 mg/misoprostol 200 mcg administered BID or TID demonstrated no statistically significant difference in efficacy in the treatment of the signs and symptoms of RA compared with diclofenac sodium 50 mg/placebo administered BID or TID.</p>","PeriodicalId":12056,"journal":{"name":"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation","volume":"14 2","pages":"5-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Double-blind comparison of the efficacy of diclofenac/misoprostol and diclofenac in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"M V de Queiroz,&nbsp;A Beaulieu,&nbsp;K Kruger,&nbsp;E Woods,&nbsp;H Stead,&nbsp;S Geis\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study was conducted in eight countries to compare the efficacy of a fixed combination of diclofenac sodium (50 mg) and misoprostol (200 mcg) with a fixed combination of diclofenac sodium (50 mg) and placebo in treating the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A total of 346 patients with RA who had been stabilised on diclofenac for at least 30 days were randomly assigned to receive either diclofenac/misoprostol BID or TID (n = 177) or diclofenac/placebo BID or TID (n = 169) for 12 weeks. Primary analyses of efficacy, made upon admission and at 4-week intervals, consisted of physician's global assessment of the arthritic condition, patient's global assessment of the arthritic condition, patient's global assessment of joint tenderness/pain, and physician's assessment of joint swelling. In this study, the fixed combination tablet of diclofenac sodium 50 mg/misoprostol 200 mcg administered BID or TID demonstrated no statistically significant difference in efficacy in the treatment of the signs and symptoms of RA compared with diclofenac sodium 50 mg/placebo administered BID or TID.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"5-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在8个国家进行了一项双盲、随机、平行组研究,比较双氯芬酸钠(50 mg)和米索前列醇(200 mcg)固定组合与双氯芬酸钠(50 mg)和安慰剂固定组合治疗类风湿性关节炎(RA)症状和体征的疗效。共有346例双氯芬酸稳定至少30天的RA患者被随机分配到双氯芬酸/米索前列醇BID或TID组(n = 177)或双氯芬酸/安慰剂BID或TID组(n = 169),为期12周。入院时和每隔4周进行一次疗效的初步分析,包括医生对关节炎状况的总体评估,患者对关节炎状况的总体评估,患者对关节压痛/疼痛的总体评估,以及医生对关节肿胀的总体评估。在本研究中,双氯芬酸钠50 mg/米索前列醇200 mcg固定联合片剂给药BID或TID与双氯芬酸钠50 mg/安慰剂给药BID或TID在治疗RA症状和体征方面的疗效无统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Double-blind comparison of the efficacy of diclofenac/misoprostol and diclofenac in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

A double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study was conducted in eight countries to compare the efficacy of a fixed combination of diclofenac sodium (50 mg) and misoprostol (200 mcg) with a fixed combination of diclofenac sodium (50 mg) and placebo in treating the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A total of 346 patients with RA who had been stabilised on diclofenac for at least 30 days were randomly assigned to receive either diclofenac/misoprostol BID or TID (n = 177) or diclofenac/placebo BID or TID (n = 169) for 12 weeks. Primary analyses of efficacy, made upon admission and at 4-week intervals, consisted of physician's global assessment of the arthritic condition, patient's global assessment of the arthritic condition, patient's global assessment of joint tenderness/pain, and physician's assessment of joint swelling. In this study, the fixed combination tablet of diclofenac sodium 50 mg/misoprostol 200 mcg administered BID or TID demonstrated no statistically significant difference in efficacy in the treatment of the signs and symptoms of RA compared with diclofenac sodium 50 mg/placebo administered BID or TID.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flurbiprofen local action transcutaneous (LAT): clinical evaluation in the treatment of acute ankle sprains. NSAIDs and the gut--where are we now? Review of Arthrotec clinical data. Rheumatological audit--a general practice perspective. Arthrotec, diclofenac and ibuprofen in general practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1