{"title":"[肿瘤患者及其伴侣的社会支持与社会压力]","authors":"H Faller, S Schilling, M Otteni, H Lang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social support is widely believed to be an important buffer against stress in patients coping with cancer. Support efforts can, however, in turn prove to become a source of distress in themselves, both in patients and support providers. The present study was designed to explore the connections between support and emotional distress. N = 120 lung cancer patients and their relatives (n = 57) are interviewed at three intervals. Social support is assessed by multiple methods: Content analysis, a questionnaire and a confidant rating performed by experts. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses are combined. Content-analytical and self-report data show a correlation of support efforts and emotional distress. In the confidant rating, however, the expected differences between supportive and non-supportive spousal relationships emerge. The results are discussed from an interactional point of view.</p>","PeriodicalId":76859,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychoanalyse","volume":"41 2","pages":"141-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Social support and social stress in tumor patients and their partners].\",\"authors\":\"H Faller, S Schilling, M Otteni, H Lang\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Social support is widely believed to be an important buffer against stress in patients coping with cancer. Support efforts can, however, in turn prove to become a source of distress in themselves, both in patients and support providers. The present study was designed to explore the connections between support and emotional distress. N = 120 lung cancer patients and their relatives (n = 57) are interviewed at three intervals. Social support is assessed by multiple methods: Content analysis, a questionnaire and a confidant rating performed by experts. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses are combined. Content-analytical and self-report data show a correlation of support efforts and emotional distress. In the confidant rating, however, the expected differences between supportive and non-supportive spousal relationships emerge. The results are discussed from an interactional point of view.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychoanalyse\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"141-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychoanalyse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychoanalyse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Social support and social stress in tumor patients and their partners].
Social support is widely believed to be an important buffer against stress in patients coping with cancer. Support efforts can, however, in turn prove to become a source of distress in themselves, both in patients and support providers. The present study was designed to explore the connections between support and emotional distress. N = 120 lung cancer patients and their relatives (n = 57) are interviewed at three intervals. Social support is assessed by multiple methods: Content analysis, a questionnaire and a confidant rating performed by experts. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses are combined. Content-analytical and self-report data show a correlation of support efforts and emotional distress. In the confidant rating, however, the expected differences between supportive and non-supportive spousal relationships emerge. The results are discussed from an interactional point of view.