将妇女和少数民族纳入职业性癌症流行病学研究。

S H Zahm, L M Pottern, D R Lewis, M H Ward, D W White
{"title":"将妇女和少数民族纳入职业性癌症流行病学研究。","authors":"S H Zahm,&nbsp;L M Pottern,&nbsp;D R Lewis,&nbsp;M H Ward,&nbsp;D W White","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A survey of published epidemiologic studies from eight journals during 1971 to 1990 was conducted to assess the proportion and characteristics of occupational cancer studies that have included women and minorities. A total of 1233 reports included 562 (46%) with subjects limited to white men. The remaining 671 (54%) had subjects from other race-gender groups. Thirty-five percent included white women, but only 14% presented any analyses of white women specifically and only 7% presented more than five risk estimates. The proportions with analyses of nonwhite women (any = 2%; detailed = 1%) or men (any = 7%; detailed = 3%) were also small. Studies with detailed analyses of women and minorities tended to use weaker methodologies (ie, proportionate mortality or cross-sectional design) than the studies of white men and were less able to provide convincing data on the occupational cancer risks of women and minorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":16617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association","volume":"36 8","pages":"842-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inclusion of women and minorities in occupational cancer epidemiologic research.\",\"authors\":\"S H Zahm,&nbsp;L M Pottern,&nbsp;D R Lewis,&nbsp;M H Ward,&nbsp;D W White\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A survey of published epidemiologic studies from eight journals during 1971 to 1990 was conducted to assess the proportion and characteristics of occupational cancer studies that have included women and minorities. A total of 1233 reports included 562 (46%) with subjects limited to white men. The remaining 671 (54%) had subjects from other race-gender groups. Thirty-five percent included white women, but only 14% presented any analyses of white women specifically and only 7% presented more than five risk estimates. The proportions with analyses of nonwhite women (any = 2%; detailed = 1%) or men (any = 7%; detailed = 3%) were also small. Studies with detailed analyses of women and minorities tended to use weaker methodologies (ie, proportionate mortality or cross-sectional design) than the studies of white men and were less able to provide convincing data on the occupational cancer risks of women and minorities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"36 8\",\"pages\":\"842-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对1971年至1990年期间发表在8个期刊上的流行病学研究进行了调查,以评估包括妇女和少数民族在内的职业性癌症研究的比例和特征。共有1233份报告,其中562份(46%)的研究对象仅限于白人男性。其余671例(54%)的受试者来自其他种族和性别群体。35%的研究包括白人女性,但只有14%的研究对白人女性进行了分析,只有7%的研究给出了超过5个风险估计。非白人女性的分析比例(任何= 2%;详细= 1%)或男性(任何= 7%;详细= 3%)也很少。与白人男性的研究相比,对妇女和少数民族进行详细分析的研究往往使用较弱的方法(即按比例死亡率或横断面设计),并且无法提供关于妇女和少数民族职业癌症风险的令人信服的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inclusion of women and minorities in occupational cancer epidemiologic research.

A survey of published epidemiologic studies from eight journals during 1971 to 1990 was conducted to assess the proportion and characteristics of occupational cancer studies that have included women and minorities. A total of 1233 reports included 562 (46%) with subjects limited to white men. The remaining 671 (54%) had subjects from other race-gender groups. Thirty-five percent included white women, but only 14% presented any analyses of white women specifically and only 7% presented more than five risk estimates. The proportions with analyses of nonwhite women (any = 2%; detailed = 1%) or men (any = 7%; detailed = 3%) were also small. Studies with detailed analyses of women and minorities tended to use weaker methodologies (ie, proportionate mortality or cross-sectional design) than the studies of white men and were less able to provide convincing data on the occupational cancer risks of women and minorities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Re: B-scan ultrasonic measurement of the lumbar spine canal as a predictor of industrial low back pain complaints and extended work loss, by M Battié et al. Re: Successful treatment of life-threatening proprionitrile exposure with sodium nitrite/sodium thiosulfate followed by hyperbaric oxygen, by Scolnick et al. Elevated dioxin blood levels in British chemical workers. Surgical gloves and hypersensitivity to latex. Sleep and alertness in a 12-hour rotating shift work environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1