{"title":"急性心肌梗死:男女治疗差异。","authors":"M Dellborg,&nbsp;K Swedberg","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/5.3.261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the last decade, treatment of myocardial infarction has changed and the prognosis dramatically improved. A sex bias in considering revascularization in men and women with coronary heart disease has been reported. The influence of gender on treatment given to patients with an acute myocardial infarction has not been investigated. From 1989 to 1991 there were 1515 patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to the coronary care unit at Ostra Hospital; 67% were men. Pharmacological treatment limiting infarct size was given to 60% of all women and to 67% of all men; p < 0.05. In addition, coronary angiography during the hospital stay was performed in 0.2% of all women vs 1.9% of all men; p < 0.05. The prevalence of diabetes, age, symptoms or prehospital delay cannot explain these findings. While a sex bias in referring patients for revascularization has been reported, this report also describes a possible sex bias in the pharmacological treatment of acute myocardial infarction.</p>","PeriodicalId":77341,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","volume":"5 3","pages":"261-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/intqhc/5.3.261","citationCount":"41","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute myocardial infarction: difference in the treatment between men and women.\",\"authors\":\"M Dellborg,&nbsp;K Swedberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/intqhc/5.3.261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During the last decade, treatment of myocardial infarction has changed and the prognosis dramatically improved. A sex bias in considering revascularization in men and women with coronary heart disease has been reported. The influence of gender on treatment given to patients with an acute myocardial infarction has not been investigated. From 1989 to 1991 there were 1515 patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to the coronary care unit at Ostra Hospital; 67% were men. Pharmacological treatment limiting infarct size was given to 60% of all women and to 67% of all men; p < 0.05. In addition, coronary angiography during the hospital stay was performed in 0.2% of all women vs 1.9% of all men; p < 0.05. The prevalence of diabetes, age, symptoms or prehospital delay cannot explain these findings. While a sex bias in referring patients for revascularization has been reported, this report also describes a possible sex bias in the pharmacological treatment of acute myocardial infarction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"261-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/intqhc/5.3.261\",\"citationCount\":\"41\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/5.3.261\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/5.3.261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

摘要

在过去的十年中,心肌梗死的治疗方法发生了变化,预后显著改善。有报道称,在考虑冠心病患者的血运重建术时存在性别偏见。性别对急性心肌梗死患者治疗的影响尚未调查。1989年至1991年,奥斯特拉医院冠心病监护室收治了1515例急性心肌梗死患者;67%为男性。60%的女性和67%的男性接受了限制梗死面积的药物治疗;P < 0.05。此外,住院期间进行冠状动脉造影的女性占0.2%,男性占1.9%;P < 0.05。糖尿病的患病率、年龄、症状或院前延迟不能解释这些发现。虽然在转诊患者进行血运重建术时存在性别偏见,但本报告也描述了在急性心肌梗死的药物治疗中可能存在的性别偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Acute myocardial infarction: difference in the treatment between men and women.

During the last decade, treatment of myocardial infarction has changed and the prognosis dramatically improved. A sex bias in considering revascularization in men and women with coronary heart disease has been reported. The influence of gender on treatment given to patients with an acute myocardial infarction has not been investigated. From 1989 to 1991 there were 1515 patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to the coronary care unit at Ostra Hospital; 67% were men. Pharmacological treatment limiting infarct size was given to 60% of all women and to 67% of all men; p < 0.05. In addition, coronary angiography during the hospital stay was performed in 0.2% of all women vs 1.9% of all men; p < 0.05. The prevalence of diabetes, age, symptoms or prehospital delay cannot explain these findings. While a sex bias in referring patients for revascularization has been reported, this report also describes a possible sex bias in the pharmacological treatment of acute myocardial infarction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The current status of autopsies in medical care in the USA. Decrease in the frequency of autopsies in Denmark after the introduction of a new autopsy act. Decreasing autopsy rate in Sweden reflects changing attitudes among clinicians. The meta-autopsy: changing techniques and attitudes towards the autopsy. The reliability of autopsy diagnostics: inter-observer variation between pathologists, a preliminary report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1