E Autret, J P Dutertre, P Barbier, A P Jonville, F Pierre, C Berger
{"title":"父母对法国图尔儿童生物医学研究的看法。","authors":"E Autret, J P Dutertre, P Barbier, A P Jonville, F Pierre, C Berger","doi":"10.1159/000457542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to evaluate parental awareness of the law governing clinical trials in France (Loi Huriet), a study was performed by questionnaire between February and April 1991 in a maternity unit during the days following delivery. The response rate was 59%. 59% of the parents (319/541) were informed of the existence of the law by the media (75%) or their general practitioners (12%). Twenty-one percent (116/541) of the parents would accept the participation of their children in a clinical trial and 74% would refuse. The principal reasons for acceptance were: for the benefit of other children, contribution to medical progress and confidence in physicians. The reasons for refusal were: risk of side effects and unproven efficacy. Parents who would accept had more often received higher education (44%) than parents who would refuse (30%), the latter being less influenced by the explanations of physicians and less willing to accept that a physician should decide for them. Physicians should consider transmitting information directly to parents and indirectly via the media.</p>","PeriodicalId":11160,"journal":{"name":"Developmental pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":"20 1-2","pages":"64-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000457542","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parental opinions about biomedical research in children in Tours, France.\",\"authors\":\"E Autret, J P Dutertre, P Barbier, A P Jonville, F Pierre, C Berger\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000457542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In order to evaluate parental awareness of the law governing clinical trials in France (Loi Huriet), a study was performed by questionnaire between February and April 1991 in a maternity unit during the days following delivery. The response rate was 59%. 59% of the parents (319/541) were informed of the existence of the law by the media (75%) or their general practitioners (12%). Twenty-one percent (116/541) of the parents would accept the participation of their children in a clinical trial and 74% would refuse. The principal reasons for acceptance were: for the benefit of other children, contribution to medical progress and confidence in physicians. The reasons for refusal were: risk of side effects and unproven efficacy. Parents who would accept had more often received higher education (44%) than parents who would refuse (30%), the latter being less influenced by the explanations of physicians and less willing to accept that a physician should decide for them. Physicians should consider transmitting information directly to parents and indirectly via the media.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental pharmacology and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"20 1-2\",\"pages\":\"64-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000457542\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental pharmacology and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000457542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000457542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Parental opinions about biomedical research in children in Tours, France.
In order to evaluate parental awareness of the law governing clinical trials in France (Loi Huriet), a study was performed by questionnaire between February and April 1991 in a maternity unit during the days following delivery. The response rate was 59%. 59% of the parents (319/541) were informed of the existence of the law by the media (75%) or their general practitioners (12%). Twenty-one percent (116/541) of the parents would accept the participation of their children in a clinical trial and 74% would refuse. The principal reasons for acceptance were: for the benefit of other children, contribution to medical progress and confidence in physicians. The reasons for refusal were: risk of side effects and unproven efficacy. Parents who would accept had more often received higher education (44%) than parents who would refuse (30%), the latter being less influenced by the explanations of physicians and less willing to accept that a physician should decide for them. Physicians should consider transmitting information directly to parents and indirectly via the media.