[疑似急性阑尾炎的腹腔镜诊断]。

Helvetica chirurgica acta Pub Date : 1994-07-01
J Nägeli, M Zünd, J Lange
{"title":"[疑似急性阑尾炎的腹腔镜诊断]。","authors":"J Nägeli,&nbsp;M Zünd,&nbsp;J Lange","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since introduction of laparoscopic appendectomy we have the possibility to examine the whole abdominal cavity and not only the ileocaecal region and right adnex. The aim of the study is to find out if there is an advantage in laparoscopic diagnostics compared to conventional laparotomy for suspected acute appendicities. We compared prospectively all patients who underwent laparoscopy for acute right lower abdominal pain between August 1991 and March 1993 with a comparable group retrospectively analyzed who underwent conventional appendectomy in 1989. In both groups 20% of patients had a normal appendix. In 1% of the laparoscopically operated patients we couldn't find any pathological findings, in 12% of the conventionally operated group we couldn't find an accurate diagnosis. The average operation time of laparoscopically operated patients without acute appendicities was 20 minutes shorter compared to conventionally operated patients. We found identically results for the duration of hospital stay. The median hospital stay for conventionally operated patients was 6.6 days, for laparoscopically operated patients 4.7 days. The complications were in both groups 1-2%. We conclude that in laparoscopy the diagnostics are more reliable, and with a diagnostic accuracy of almost 100% the unnecessary appendectomy with a higher morbidity would not be necessary in 12% of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":75902,"journal":{"name":"Helvetica chirurgica acta","volume":"60 5","pages":"787-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Laparoscopic diagnosis in suspected acute appendicitis].\",\"authors\":\"J Nägeli,&nbsp;M Zünd,&nbsp;J Lange\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since introduction of laparoscopic appendectomy we have the possibility to examine the whole abdominal cavity and not only the ileocaecal region and right adnex. The aim of the study is to find out if there is an advantage in laparoscopic diagnostics compared to conventional laparotomy for suspected acute appendicities. We compared prospectively all patients who underwent laparoscopy for acute right lower abdominal pain between August 1991 and March 1993 with a comparable group retrospectively analyzed who underwent conventional appendectomy in 1989. In both groups 20% of patients had a normal appendix. In 1% of the laparoscopically operated patients we couldn't find any pathological findings, in 12% of the conventionally operated group we couldn't find an accurate diagnosis. The average operation time of laparoscopically operated patients without acute appendicities was 20 minutes shorter compared to conventionally operated patients. We found identically results for the duration of hospital stay. The median hospital stay for conventionally operated patients was 6.6 days, for laparoscopically operated patients 4.7 days. The complications were in both groups 1-2%. We conclude that in laparoscopy the diagnostics are more reliable, and with a diagnostic accuracy of almost 100% the unnecessary appendectomy with a higher morbidity would not be necessary in 12% of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Helvetica chirurgica acta\",\"volume\":\"60 5\",\"pages\":\"787-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Helvetica chirurgica acta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Helvetica chirurgica acta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自从引入腹腔镜阑尾切除术以来,我们有可能检查整个腹腔,而不仅仅是回盲区和右附件。该研究的目的是找出在疑似急性阑尾炎的腹腔镜诊断与传统剖腹手术相比是否有优势。我们前瞻性地比较了1991年8月至1993年3月期间接受腹腔镜治疗急性右下腹痛的所有患者与1989年接受常规阑尾切除术的对照组。两组中20%的患者阑尾正常。在1%的腹腔镜手术患者中我们找不到任何病理发现,在12%的常规手术患者中我们找不到准确的诊断。无急性阑尾的患者行腹腔镜手术的平均手术时间比常规手术缩短20分钟。我们在住院期间发现了相同的结果。常规手术患者的中位住院时间为6.6天,腹腔镜手术患者的中位住院时间为4.7天。两组并发症发生率均为1-2%。我们得出结论,腹腔镜诊断更可靠,诊断准确率接近100%,12%的患者无需进行不必要的阑尾切除术,但发病率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Laparoscopic diagnosis in suspected acute appendicitis].

Since introduction of laparoscopic appendectomy we have the possibility to examine the whole abdominal cavity and not only the ileocaecal region and right adnex. The aim of the study is to find out if there is an advantage in laparoscopic diagnostics compared to conventional laparotomy for suspected acute appendicities. We compared prospectively all patients who underwent laparoscopy for acute right lower abdominal pain between August 1991 and March 1993 with a comparable group retrospectively analyzed who underwent conventional appendectomy in 1989. In both groups 20% of patients had a normal appendix. In 1% of the laparoscopically operated patients we couldn't find any pathological findings, in 12% of the conventionally operated group we couldn't find an accurate diagnosis. The average operation time of laparoscopically operated patients without acute appendicities was 20 minutes shorter compared to conventionally operated patients. We found identically results for the duration of hospital stay. The median hospital stay for conventionally operated patients was 6.6 days, for laparoscopically operated patients 4.7 days. The complications were in both groups 1-2%. We conclude that in laparoscopy the diagnostics are more reliable, and with a diagnostic accuracy of almost 100% the unnecessary appendectomy with a higher morbidity would not be necessary in 12% of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Ganglion]. Coronary Artery Surgery [The value of PSA follow-up in recurrent prostate carcinoma after radical prostatovesiculectomy]. [Long-term follow-up of serum prostate-specific antigen after radiotherapy of prostatic carcinoma]. [Localized fibrous tumor of the pleura. 2 case reports and differential diagnoses].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1