自杀患者治疗成本控制的复杂因素。

D J Rissmiller, R Steer, W F Ranieri, F Rissmiller, P Hogate
{"title":"自杀患者治疗成本控制的复杂因素。","authors":"D J Rissmiller,&nbsp;R Steer,&nbsp;W F Ranieri,&nbsp;F Rissmiller,&nbsp;P Hogate","doi":"10.1176/ps.45.8.782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The treatment of suicidal patients contributes to escalating mental health expenditures. Fiscal realities necessitate that cost-containment measures be implemented wherever possible. The authors reviewed the literature to delineate factors that impede cost containment for the treatment of suicidal patients and to outline strategies for controlling costs while improving the quality of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Psychological Abstracts and MEDLINE databases were reviewed. Retrieval and analysis focused on literature published between 1982 and 1992.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>Five factors unique to the treatment of suicidal patients that impede cost containment were identified: the lack of a specific and cost-effective screening method to determine true risk of suicide, the high number of parasuicidal and malingering patients, revolving-door admissions of involuntary patients who become noncompliant with treatment after discharge, the adverse clinical consequences of further increases in existing discriminatory mental health benefits, and the medicolegal liability incurred in treating suicidal patients. The low frequency of completed suicides in relation to attempts and reported ideation indicates that most inpatients labeled suicidal are hospitalized unnecessarily. Thus inpatient treatment should be reserved for patients who make attempts of high lethality and patients with suicidal ideation who are at high risk because of other factors. Ideally, suicidal patients should be committed not to an inpatient facility but to a treatment network in which they can move appropriately between inpatient, day hospital, and outpatient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":75910,"journal":{"name":"Hospital & community psychiatry","volume":"45 8","pages":"782-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1176/ps.45.8.782","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors complicating cost containment in the treatment of suicidal patients.\",\"authors\":\"D J Rissmiller,&nbsp;R Steer,&nbsp;W F Ranieri,&nbsp;F Rissmiller,&nbsp;P Hogate\",\"doi\":\"10.1176/ps.45.8.782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The treatment of suicidal patients contributes to escalating mental health expenditures. Fiscal realities necessitate that cost-containment measures be implemented wherever possible. The authors reviewed the literature to delineate factors that impede cost containment for the treatment of suicidal patients and to outline strategies for controlling costs while improving the quality of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Psychological Abstracts and MEDLINE databases were reviewed. Retrieval and analysis focused on literature published between 1982 and 1992.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>Five factors unique to the treatment of suicidal patients that impede cost containment were identified: the lack of a specific and cost-effective screening method to determine true risk of suicide, the high number of parasuicidal and malingering patients, revolving-door admissions of involuntary patients who become noncompliant with treatment after discharge, the adverse clinical consequences of further increases in existing discriminatory mental health benefits, and the medicolegal liability incurred in treating suicidal patients. The low frequency of completed suicides in relation to attempts and reported ideation indicates that most inpatients labeled suicidal are hospitalized unnecessarily. Thus inpatient treatment should be reserved for patients who make attempts of high lethality and patients with suicidal ideation who are at high risk because of other factors. Ideally, suicidal patients should be committed not to an inpatient facility but to a treatment network in which they can move appropriately between inpatient, day hospital, and outpatient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital & community psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"45 8\",\"pages\":\"782-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1176/ps.45.8.782\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital & community psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.45.8.782\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital & community psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.45.8.782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

目的:自杀患者的治疗导致心理健康支出的增加。财政现实要求尽可能实施成本控制措施。作者回顾了文献,描述了阻碍自杀患者治疗成本控制的因素,并概述了在提高护理质量的同时控制成本的策略。方法:查阅心理学文摘和MEDLINE数据库。检索和分析的重点是1982年至1992年之间发表的文献。结果和结论:确定了自杀患者治疗中阻碍成本控制的五个独特因素:缺乏确定自杀真正风险的具体和具有成本效益的筛查方法,大量准自杀和装病患者,出院后不遵守治疗的非自愿患者的旋转门入院,现有歧视性心理健康福利进一步增加的不良临床后果,以及治疗自杀患者所产生的医疗法律责任。与自杀未遂和报告的自杀意念相比,自杀未遂的频率较低,这表明大多数被贴上自杀标签的住院病人住院治疗是不必要的。因此,住院治疗应保留给有高致命性企图的患者和有自杀意念但因其他因素而处于高风险的患者。理想情况下,有自杀倾向的病人不应该被送进住院部,而应该送到一个治疗网络,在那里他们可以在住院部、日间医院和门诊护理之间适当地移动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors complicating cost containment in the treatment of suicidal patients.

Objective: The treatment of suicidal patients contributes to escalating mental health expenditures. Fiscal realities necessitate that cost-containment measures be implemented wherever possible. The authors reviewed the literature to delineate factors that impede cost containment for the treatment of suicidal patients and to outline strategies for controlling costs while improving the quality of care.

Methods: Psychological Abstracts and MEDLINE databases were reviewed. Retrieval and analysis focused on literature published between 1982 and 1992.

Results and conclusions: Five factors unique to the treatment of suicidal patients that impede cost containment were identified: the lack of a specific and cost-effective screening method to determine true risk of suicide, the high number of parasuicidal and malingering patients, revolving-door admissions of involuntary patients who become noncompliant with treatment after discharge, the adverse clinical consequences of further increases in existing discriminatory mental health benefits, and the medicolegal liability incurred in treating suicidal patients. The low frequency of completed suicides in relation to attempts and reported ideation indicates that most inpatients labeled suicidal are hospitalized unnecessarily. Thus inpatient treatment should be reserved for patients who make attempts of high lethality and patients with suicidal ideation who are at high risk because of other factors. Ideally, suicidal patients should be committed not to an inpatient facility but to a treatment network in which they can move appropriately between inpatient, day hospital, and outpatient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Controlled drinking. How to treat inpatients. Multiple personality. Clinical and treatment correlates of access to Section 8 certificates for homeless mentally ill persons. Characteristics of private-sector managed care for mental health and substance abuse treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1