{"title":"预测抗心律失常药物的疗效。","authors":"J W Mason","doi":"10.1080/21548331.1994.11443069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For years, electrophysiologic testing was regarded as the best way to select effective pharmacologic therapy. But now it appears that Holter monitoring is just as accurate--as well as simpler, safer, and cheaper. Nevertheless, most patients eventually will need an electrophysiologic study because of the high rate of arrhythmia recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":77164,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice (Office ed.)","volume":"29 9","pages":"28-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21548331.1994.11443069","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting antiarrhythmic drug efficacy.\",\"authors\":\"J W Mason\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21548331.1994.11443069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>For years, electrophysiologic testing was regarded as the best way to select effective pharmacologic therapy. But now it appears that Holter monitoring is just as accurate--as well as simpler, safer, and cheaper. Nevertheless, most patients eventually will need an electrophysiologic study because of the high rate of arrhythmia recurrence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital practice (Office ed.)\",\"volume\":\"29 9\",\"pages\":\"28-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21548331.1994.11443069\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital practice (Office ed.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.1994.11443069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice (Office ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.1994.11443069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
For years, electrophysiologic testing was regarded as the best way to select effective pharmacologic therapy. But now it appears that Holter monitoring is just as accurate--as well as simpler, safer, and cheaper. Nevertheless, most patients eventually will need an electrophysiologic study because of the high rate of arrhythmia recurrence.