不同麻醉方案对组织抗氧化酶活性的影响。

D V Godin, M E Garnett
{"title":"不同麻醉方案对组织抗氧化酶活性的影响。","authors":"D V Godin,&nbsp;M E Garnett","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has been suggested that oxidative processes are involved in a variety of pathological conditions, notably ischemia-reperfusion injury. Moreover, anesthetics appear to exert differential effects on the severity of such injury, these being unlikely wholly attributable to their differential effects on cardiovascular or microcirculatory status. It is possible that these variable effects of anesthetics on this type of injury may be due, at least in part, to changes in the production of free radicals and/or in their detoxification by endogenous antioxidant enzymes. We have attempted to explore the latter possibility by measuring activities of catalase, superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and glutathione reductase in normal heart tissue and red cells obtained from rats anesthetized using a variety of agents (CO2, halothane, pentobarbital or ether). For comparison, analyses were also performed on tissues from unanesthetized animals rendered unconscious by stunning prior to sacrifice. Results indicated that myocardial SOD activity was significantly greater in halothane-anesthetized as compared with CO2-anesthetized animals. Red cell SOD activities did not show such differences. However, red cell GPX activity was found to be greater in halothane-anesthetized than in pentobarbital-anesthetized rats. In general, however, antioxidant enzyme activities measured ex vivo were minimally affected by the use of anesthetics prior to euthanasia. Our findings, therefore, do not support the proposal that the influence of anesthetics on the course of ischemia-reperfusion injury involves effects at the level of enzymatic antioxidant components.</p>","PeriodicalId":21140,"journal":{"name":"Research communications in chemical pathology and pharmacology","volume":"83 1","pages":"93-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of various anesthetic regimens on tissue antioxidant enzyme activities.\",\"authors\":\"D V Godin,&nbsp;M E Garnett\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It has been suggested that oxidative processes are involved in a variety of pathological conditions, notably ischemia-reperfusion injury. Moreover, anesthetics appear to exert differential effects on the severity of such injury, these being unlikely wholly attributable to their differential effects on cardiovascular or microcirculatory status. It is possible that these variable effects of anesthetics on this type of injury may be due, at least in part, to changes in the production of free radicals and/or in their detoxification by endogenous antioxidant enzymes. We have attempted to explore the latter possibility by measuring activities of catalase, superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and glutathione reductase in normal heart tissue and red cells obtained from rats anesthetized using a variety of agents (CO2, halothane, pentobarbital or ether). For comparison, analyses were also performed on tissues from unanesthetized animals rendered unconscious by stunning prior to sacrifice. Results indicated that myocardial SOD activity was significantly greater in halothane-anesthetized as compared with CO2-anesthetized animals. Red cell SOD activities did not show such differences. However, red cell GPX activity was found to be greater in halothane-anesthetized than in pentobarbital-anesthetized rats. In general, however, antioxidant enzyme activities measured ex vivo were minimally affected by the use of anesthetics prior to euthanasia. Our findings, therefore, do not support the proposal that the influence of anesthetics on the course of ischemia-reperfusion injury involves effects at the level of enzymatic antioxidant components.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research communications in chemical pathology and pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"93-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research communications in chemical pathology and pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research communications in chemical pathology and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

已有研究表明,氧化过程参与多种病理条件,特别是缺血再灌注损伤。此外,麻醉药似乎对这种损伤的严重程度产生不同的影响,这些不太可能完全归因于它们对心血管或微循环状态的不同影响。麻醉药对这类损伤的不同影响可能至少部分是由于内源性抗氧化酶对自由基产生和/或其解毒作用的改变。我们试图通过测量使用各种药物(CO2、氟烷、戊巴比妥或乙醚)麻醉的大鼠正常心脏组织和红细胞中过氧化氢酶、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GPX)和谷胱甘肽还原酶的活性来探索后一种可能性。为了进行比较,还分析了未麻醉动物的组织,这些动物在祭祀前被击昏而失去知觉。结果表明,氟烷麻醉大鼠心肌SOD活性明显高于co2麻醉大鼠。红细胞SOD活性无明显差异。然而,与戊巴比妥麻醉的大鼠相比,氟烷麻醉的大鼠红细胞GPX活性更高。然而,总的来说,在安乐死前使用麻醉剂对体外抗氧化酶活性的影响最小。因此,我们的研究结果不支持麻醉药对缺血再灌注损伤过程的影响涉及酶抗氧化成分水平的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of various anesthetic regimens on tissue antioxidant enzyme activities.

It has been suggested that oxidative processes are involved in a variety of pathological conditions, notably ischemia-reperfusion injury. Moreover, anesthetics appear to exert differential effects on the severity of such injury, these being unlikely wholly attributable to their differential effects on cardiovascular or microcirculatory status. It is possible that these variable effects of anesthetics on this type of injury may be due, at least in part, to changes in the production of free radicals and/or in their detoxification by endogenous antioxidant enzymes. We have attempted to explore the latter possibility by measuring activities of catalase, superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and glutathione reductase in normal heart tissue and red cells obtained from rats anesthetized using a variety of agents (CO2, halothane, pentobarbital or ether). For comparison, analyses were also performed on tissues from unanesthetized animals rendered unconscious by stunning prior to sacrifice. Results indicated that myocardial SOD activity was significantly greater in halothane-anesthetized as compared with CO2-anesthetized animals. Red cell SOD activities did not show such differences. However, red cell GPX activity was found to be greater in halothane-anesthetized than in pentobarbital-anesthetized rats. In general, however, antioxidant enzyme activities measured ex vivo were minimally affected by the use of anesthetics prior to euthanasia. Our findings, therefore, do not support the proposal that the influence of anesthetics on the course of ischemia-reperfusion injury involves effects at the level of enzymatic antioxidant components.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bradykinin induces generation of reactive oxygen species in bovine aortic endothelial cells. Inhibition of antigen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness in rats: effects of ozagrel (a thromboxane A2 synthase inhibitor) and of CV-3988 (a platelet activating factor antagonist). Enhanced sensitivity of mdx mice to intramuscular injection of compound 48/80. Copper cytotoxicity impairs DNA synthesis but not protein phosphorylation upon growth stimulation in LEC mutant rat. Elevation of ceruloplasmin activity involved in changes of hepatic metal concentration in primary biliary cirrhosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1